TY  - CONF
A1  - Matwijkiw, Anja
A1  - Matwijkiw, Bronik
T1  - Stakeholder jurisprudence: the new way in human rights
T2  - 25th IVR World Congress: Law, Science and Technology Frankfurt am Main 15–20 August 2011 ; Paper Series ; 014
N2  - Making use of United Nations (U.N.) materials and documents, Anja Matwijkiw and Bronik Matwijkiw argue that the organization – in 2004 – converted to a stakeholder jurisprudence for human rights. However, references to “stakeholders” may both be made in the context of narrow stakeholder theory and broad stakeholder theory. Since the U.N. does not specify its commitment by naming the theory it credits for its conversion, the authors of the article embark on a comparative analysis, so as to be able to try the two frameworks for fit. The hypothesis is that it is the philosophy and methodology of broad stakeholder theory that best matches the norms and strategies of the U.N. While this is the case, certain challenges nevertheless present themselves. As a consequence of these, the U.N. has to – as a minimum – take things under renewed consideration.
T3  - 25th IVR World Congress: Law, Science and Technology Frankfurt am Main 15–20 August 2011 ; Paper Series - 014 
KW  - stakeholder theory
KW  - human rights
KW  - jurisprudence
KW  - international law
KW  - United Nations
Y1  - 2012
UR  - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/24872
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-248721
PB  - Goethe-Univ.
CY  - Frankfurt am Main
ER  -