TY  - INPR
A1  - Alexiadou, Artemis
A1  - Anagnostopoulou, Elena
A1  - Iordăchioaia, Gianina Nicoleta
A1  - Marchis, Mihaela Adriana
A2  - Hornstein, Norbert
A2  - Polinsky, Maria
T1  - No objections to backward control?
N2  - The aim of this paper is to address two main counterarguments raised in Landau (2007) against the movement analysis of Control, and especially against the phenomenon of Backward Control. The paper shows that unlike the situation described in Tsez (Polinsky & Potsdam 2002), Landau's objections do not hold for Greek and Romanian, where all obligatory control verbs exhibit Backward Control. Our results thus provide stronger empirical support for a theoretical approach to Control in terms of Movement, as defended in Hornstein (1999 and subsequent work).
Y1  - 2009
UR  - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/11882
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1128330
UR  - http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/files/BC%20paper.pdf
SN  - 978-90-272-5537-2
SN  - 90-272-5537-7
SN  - 978-90-272-8833-2
SN  - 90-272-8833-X
N1  - Preprint, erschienen in: Norbert Hornstein ; Maria Polinsky (Hrsg.): Movement theory of control, Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010, S. 89–118, Linguistik aktuell - Linguistics today ; 154, ISBN: 978-90-272-5537-2, ISBN: 90-272-5537-7, ISBN: 978-90-272-8833-2, ISBN: 90-272-8833-X, doi:10.1075/la.154.04ale
SP  - 1
EP  - 23
ER  -