TY  - CONF
A1  - Hamann, Silke
T1  - Postalveolar fricatives in Slavic languages as retroflexes
N2  - The present study poses the question on what phonetic and phonological grounds postalveolar fricatives in Polish can be analyzed as retroflex and whether postalveolar fricatives in other Slavic languages are retroflex as well. Velarization and incompatibility with front vowels are introduced as articulatory criteria for retroflexion, based on crosslinguistic data. According to these criteria, Polish and Russian have retroflex fricatives, whereas Bulgarian and Czech do not. In a phonological representation of these Slavic retroflexes, the necessity of perceptual features is shown. Lastly, it is illustrated that palatalization of retroflex fricatives both in Slavic languages and more generally causes a phonetic and phonological change to a non-retroflex sound.
KW  - Phonetik
KW  - Retroflex
Y1  - 2003
UR  - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/12520
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1133996
UR  - http://user.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/~hamann/Hamann2002SlavicRet.pdf
N1  - Postprint, auch in: Sergio Baauw, Mike Huiskes, Maaike Schoorlemmer: OTS Yearbook . - Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, 2002, S. 105-127.Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of
Slavic Languages (FDSL-4) in Potsdam
ER  -