TY - JOUR A1 - Smolen, Josef S. A1 - Breedveld, Ferdinand C. A1 - Burmester, Gerd-Rüdiger A1 - Bykerk, Vivian A1 - Dougados, Maxime A1 - Emery, Paul A1 - Kvien, Tore K. A1 - Navarro-Compán, M. Victoria A1 - Oliver, Susan A1 - Schoels, Monika A1 - Scholte-Voshaar, Marieke A1 - Stamm, Tanja A1 - Stoffer, Michaela A1 - Takeuchi, Tsutomu A1 - Aletaha, Daniel A1 - Andreu, Jose Louis A1 - Aringer, Martin A1 - Bergman, Martin A1 - Bijlsma, Hans A1 - Burkhardt, Harald A1 - Cardiel-Ríos, Mario Humberto A1 - Combe, Bernard A1 - Durez, Patrick A1 - Fonseca, Joao Eurico A1 - Gibofsky, Alan A1 - Gomez-Reino, Juan J. A1 - Graninger, Winfried A1 - Hannonen, Pekka A1 - Haraoui, Boulos A1 - Kouloumas, Marios A1 - Landewe, Robert A1 - Martin-Mola, Emilio A1 - Nash, Peter A1 - Ostergaard, Mikkel A1 - Östör, Andrew A1 - Richards, Pam A1 - Sokka-Isler, Tuulikki A1 - Thorne, Carter A1 - Tzioufas, Athanasios G. A1 - Vollenhoven, Ronald van A1 - Wit, Martinus de A1 - Heijde, Désirée M. van der T1 - Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force T2 - Annals of the rheumatic diseases N2 - Background Reaching the therapeutic target of remission or low-disease activity has improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly. The treat-to-target recommendations, formulated in 2010, have provided a basis for implementation of a strategic approach towards this therapeutic goal in routine clinical practice, but these recommendations need to be re-evaluated for appropriateness and practicability in the light of new insights. Objective To update the 2010 treat-to-target recommendations based on systematic literature reviews (SLR) and expert opinion. Methods A task force of rheumatologists, patients and a nurse specialist assessed the SLR results and evaluated the individual items of the 2010 recommendations accordingly, reformulating many of the items. These were subsequently discussed, amended and voted upon by >40 experts, including 5 patients, from various regions of the world. Levels of evidence, strengths of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. Results The update resulted in 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. The previous recommendations were partly adapted and their order changed as deemed appropriate in terms of importance in the view of the experts. The SLR had now provided also data for the effectiveness of targeting low-disease activity or remission in established rather than only early disease. The role of comorbidities, including their potential to preclude treatment intensification, was highlighted more strongly than before. The treatment aim was again defined as remission with low-disease activity being an alternative goal especially in patients with long-standing disease. Regular follow-up (every 1–3 months during active disease) with according therapeutic adaptations to reach the desired state was recommended. Follow-up examinations ought to employ composite measures of disease activity that include joint counts. Additional items provide further details for particular aspects of the disease, especially comorbidity and shared decision-making with the patient. Levels of evidence had increased for many items compared with the 2010 recommendations, and levels of agreement were very high for most of the individual recommendations (≥9/10). Conclusions The 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations are based on stronger evidence than before and are supposed to inform patients, rheumatologists and other stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA. KW - Disease Activity KW - Early Rheumatoid Arthritis KW - Outcomes research KW - Rheumatoid Arthritis KW - Treatment Y1 - 2015 UR - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/40531 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-405319 N1 - This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/ VL - 75 IS - 1 SP - 3 EP - 15 PB - BMJ Publ. Group CY - London ER -