TY - JOUR A1 - Frieler, Katja A1 - Levermann, Anders A1 - Elliot, Joshua A1 - Heinke, Jens A1 - Arneth, Almut A1 - Bierkens, Marc F. P. A1 - Ciais, Philippe A1 - Clark, Douglas B. A1 - Deryng, Delphine A1 - Döll, Petra A1 - Falloon, Pete A1 - Fekete, Balázs M. A1 - Folberth, Christian A1 - Friend, Andrew D. A1 - Gellhorn, Catrin A1 - Gosling, Simon N. A1 - Haddeland, Ingjerd A1 - Khabarov, Nikolay A1 - Lomas, Marc R. A1 - Masaki, Yusuke A1 - Nishina, Kazuya A1 - Neumann, Kathleen A1 - Oki, Taikan A1 - Pavlick, Ryan A1 - Ruane, Alex C. A1 - Schmid, Erwin A1 - Schmitz, Christoph A1 - Stacke, Tobias A1 - Stehfest, Elke A1 - Tang, Qiuhong A1 - Wisser, Dominik A1 - Huber, Veronika A1 - Piontek, Franziska A1 - Warszawski, Lila A1 - Schewe, Jacob A1 - Lotze-Campen, Hermann A1 - Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim T1 - The relevance of uncertainty in future crop production for mitigation strategy planning T2 - Earth System Dynamics Discussions N2 - In order to achieve climate change mitigation, long-term decisions are required that must be reconciled with other societal goals that draw on the same resources. For example, ensuring food security for a growing population may require an expansion of crop land, thereby reducing natural carbon sinks or the area available for bio-energy production. Here, we show that current impact-model uncertainties pose an important challenge to long-term mitigation planning and propose a new risk-assessment and decision framework that accounts for competing interests. Based on cross-sectorally consistent simulations generated within the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP) we discuss potential gains and limitations of additional irrigation and trade-offs of the expansion of agricultural land as two possible response measures to climate change and growing food demand. We describe an illustrative example in which the combination of both measures may close the supply demand gap while leading to a loss of approximately half of all natural carbon sinks. We highlight current limitations of available simulations and additional steps required for a comprehensive risk assessment. Y1 - 2014 UR - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/30645 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-306454 SN - 2190-4987 SN - 2190-4979 VL - 5 SP - 1075 EP - 1099 PB - Copernicus Publications CY - Göttingen ER -