TY  - INPR
A1  - Richter, Frank
A1  - Kallmeyer, Laura
A2  - Søgaard, Anders
A2  - Haugereid, Petter
T1  - Feature logic-based semantic composition : a comparison between LRS and LTAG
N2  - In this paper we will explore the similarities and differences between two feature logic-based approaches to the composition of semantic representations. The first approach is formulated for Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (LTAG, Joshi and Schabes 1997), the second is Lexical Ressource Semantics (LRS, Richter and Sailer 2004) and was first defined in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. The two frameworks have several common characteristics that make them easy to compare: 1 They use languages of two sorted type theory for semantic representations. 2. They allow underspecification. LTAG uses scope constraints while LRS provides component-of contraints. 3 They use feature logics for computing semantic representations. 4. they are designed for computational applications. By comparing the two frameworks we will also point outsome characteristics and advantages of feature logic-based semantic computation in genereal.
KW  - Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar
KW  - Lexical Ressource Semantics
Y1  - 2008
UR  - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/9849
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1110302
UR  - http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~lk/papers/richterkallmeyer.pdf
SN  - 978-3-631-57550-5
N1  - auch in: Anders Søgaard ; Petter Haugereid (Hrsg.): Postproceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Typed Feature Structure Grammars (TFSG'06), S. 31-83, erschienen als: Typed feature structure grammars, Frankfurt, M. ; Berlin ; Bern ; Bruxelles ; New York, NY ; Oxford ; Wien : Lang, 2009, Europäische Hochschulschriften / Reihe 21 / Linguistik ; Vol. 319, S. 37-92, ISBN: 978-3-631-57550-5
SP  - 1
EP  - 55
ER  -