Degraded acceptability and markedness in syntax, and the stochastic interpretation of optimality theory

The argument that I tried to elaborate on in this paper is that the conceptual problem behind the traditional competence/performance distinction does not go away, even if we abandon its original Chomskyan formulation. It
The argument that I tried to elaborate on in this paper is that the conceptual problem behind the traditional competence/performance distinction does not go away, even if we abandon its original Chomskyan formulation. It returns as the question about the relation between the model of the grammar and the results of empirical investigations – the question of empirical verification The theoretical concept of markedness is argued to be an ideal correlate of gradience. Optimality Theory, being based on markedness, is a promising framework for the task of bridging the gap between model and empirical world. However, this task not only requires a model of grammar, but also a theory of the methods that are chosen in empirical investigations and how their results are interpreted, and a theory of how to derive predictions for these particular empirical investigations from the model. Stochastic Optimality Theory is one possible formulation of a proposal that derives empirical predictions from an OT model. However, I hope to have shown that it is not enough to take frequency distributions and relative acceptabilities at face value, and simply construe some Stochastic OT model that fits the facts. These facts first of all need to be interpreted, and those factors that the grammar has to account for must be sorted out from those about which grammar should have nothing to say. This task, to my mind, is more complicated than the picture that a simplistic application of (not only) Stochastic OT might draw.
show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

  • Export Bibtex
  • Export RIS

Additional Services

    Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Ralf Vogel
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1152996
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.001.0001
ISBN:0199274797
ISBN:9780199274796
Editor:Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Matthias Schlesewsky, Ralf Vogel
Document Type:Preprint
Language:English
Year of Completion:2004
Year of first Publication:2004
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2010/05/27
Tag:acceptability; gradience grammar; grammaticality; long wh-movement; phonology; question formation; stress patterns; syntax; tones; word order variation
SWD-Keyword:Chomsky; Grammatikalität; Noam; Optimalitätstheorie; Relativsatz; Stochastik; Syntax
Pagenumber:29
First Page:1
Last Page:29
Note:
Erschienen in: Gisbert Fanselow ; Caroline Féry ; Matthias Schlesewsky ; Ralf Vogel (Hrsg.): Gradience in Grammar : generative perspectives, Oxford [u. a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2006, S. 246-269, ISBN: 0199274797, ISBN: 9780199274796, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.001.0001
Source:(in:) Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Matthias Schlesewsky, Ralf Vogel (Hg.): Gradience in Grammar : generative perspectives. - Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006, 246-269 [S. 1-29]. (Oxford lingui
HeBIS PPN:226053865
Contributor:Fanselow, Gisbert (Hg.) , Féry, Caroline (Hg.) , Schlesewsky, Matthias (Hg.) , Vogel, Ralf (Hg.)
Institutes:Extern
Dewey Decimal Classification:400 Sprache
Sammlungen:GiNDok
Linguistik
GindokWeimar
Linguistic-Classification:Linguistik-Klassifikation: Syntax
Licence (German):License Logo Veröffentlichungsvertrag für Publikationen

$Rev: 11761 $