Manipulating reliance on intuition reduces risk and ambiguity aversion

  • Prior research suggests that those who rely on intuition rather than effortful reasoning when making decisions are less averse to risk and ambiguity. The evidence is largely correlational, however, leaving open the question of the direction of causality. In this paper, we present experimental evidence of causation running from reliance on intuition to risk and ambiguity preferences. We directly manipulate participants’ predilection to rely on intuition and find that enhancing reliance on intuition lowers the probability of being ambiguity averse by 30 percentage points and increases risk tolerance by about 30 percent in the experimental sub-population where we would a priori expect the manipulation to be successful(males).

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Jeffrey V. Butler, Luigi Guiso, Tullio JappelliORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-324909
Parent Title (German):Center for Financial Studies (Frankfurt am Main): CFS working paper series ; No. 2013,13
Series (Serial Number):CFS working paper series (2013, 13)
Publisher:Center for Financial Studies
Place of publication:Frankfurt, M.
Document Type:Working Paper
Language:English
Year of Completion:2013
Year of first Publication:2013
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2013/12/13
Tag:ambiguity aversion; decision theory; dual systems; intuitive thinking; risk aversion
Page Number:24
HeBIS-PPN:349957592
Institutes:Wissenschaftliche Zentren und koordinierte Programme / Center for Financial Studies (CFS)
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoDeutsches Urheberrecht