The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 5 of 1248
Back to Result List

Clinical outcome predictors in space-occupying cerebellar infarction undergoing suboccipital decompressive craniectomy

  • Oral e-Poster Presentations - Booth 1: Vascular 3, September 27, 2023, 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM Background: Despite current clinical guidelines recommending suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) in patients with space-occupying cerebellar infarction when neurological deterioration occurs, the precise definition of such deterioration remains unclear. The current study aimed at characterizing whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC, and whether higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes. We aimed to characterize whether clinical outcomes can be predicted by the GCS score immediately prior to SDC, and if higher GCS scores are associated with better clinical outcomes. Methods: In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 51 patients treated with SDC for space-occupying cerebellar infarction clinical and imaging data were evaluated at the timepoints of symptom onset, hospital admission and preoperatively. Clinical outcome was measured by mRS at the last available follow-up. Preoperative GCS scores were stratified into three groups (GCS 3-8, 9-11 and 12-15). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed using clinical and radiological parameters as predictors of clinical outcome. Results: In Cox-regression analysis using mRS of 1-2 as a positive clinical outcome we found a significant increase in the proportional hazard ratio (HR) of 6.581 [CI 1.839-36.414]; p=0.031 for GCS scores of 12-15 prior to SDC. Clinical outcomes (mRS 3-6) were associated with infarct volume above 6.0 cm3 (HR 2.473 [CI 1.209-5.057]; p=0.013), tonsillar herniation (HR: 0.279 [CI 0.083-0.933]; p=0.038), brainstem compression (HR 0.304 [CI 0.123-0.749]; p=0.010) and a preoperative GCS score of 3-8 (HR 2.386 [CI 1.160-4.906]; p=0.018). Conclusions: SDC should be considered in patients with infarct volumes above 6.0 cm3 with GCS scores higher than previously described in the literature, as these patients may show better long-term outcome than those in which surgery is delayed until a GCS score of 11 or lower.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Kristin Lucia, Sarah ReitzORCiDGND, Elke HattingenORCiDGND, Helmuth SteinmetzORCiDGND, Volker SeifertORCiD, Marcus Alexander CzabankaORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-788162
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102029
ISSN:2772-5294
Parent Title (English):Brain and Spine
Publisher:Elsevier
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Document Type:Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2023/09/26
Date of first Publication:2023/09/26
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Creating Corporation:European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Congress (2023 : Barcelona)
Release Date:2023/10/28
Volume:3
Issue:Supplement 1, 102029
Article Number:102029
Page Number:1
HeBIS-PPN:513398937
Institutes:Medizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International