Open Access

Katrina E. Deane, Francisco García Rosales, Ruslan Klymentiev, Julio C. Hechavarria, Max Happel

• The brains of black 6 mice (Mus musculus) and Seba’s short-tailed bats (Carollia perspicillata) weigh roughly the same and share mammalian neocortical laminar architecture. Bats have highly developed sonar calls and social communication and are an excellent neuroethological animal model for auditory research. Mice are olfactory and somatosensory specialists, used frequently in auditory neuroscience for their advantage of standardization and wide genetic toolkit. This study presents an analytical approach to overcome the challenge of inter-species comparison with existing data. In both data sets, we recorded with linear multichannel electrodes down the depth of the primary auditory cortex (A1) while presenting repetitive stimuli trains at ~5 and ~40 Hz to awake bats and mice. We found that while there are similarities between cortical response profiles in both, there was a better signal to noise ratio in bats under these conditions, which allowed for a clearer following response to stimuli trains. Model fit analysis supported this, illustrating that bats had stronger response amplitude suppression to consecutive stimuli. Additionally, continuous wavelet transform revealed that bats had significantly stronger power and phase coherence during stimulus response and mice had stronger power in the background. Better signal to noise ratio and lower intertrial phase variability in bats could represent specialization for faster and more accurate temporal processing at lower metabolic costs. Our findings demonstrate a potentially different general auditory processing principle; investigating such differences may increase our understanding of how the ecological need of a species shapes the development and function of its nervous system.