Comparing four video laryngoscopes and one optical laryngoscope with a standard macintosh blade in a simulated trapped car accident victim

  • Background. Tracheal intubation still represents the "gold standard" in securing the airway of unconscious patients in the prehospital setting. Especially in cases of restricted access to the patient, video laryngoscopy became more and more relevant. Objectives. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance and intubation success of four different video laryngoscopes, one optical laryngoscope, and a Macintosh blade while intubating from two different positions in a mannequin trial with difficult access to the patient. Methods. A mannequin with a cervical collar was placed on the driver’s seat. Intubation was performed with six different laryngoscopes either through the driver’s window or from the backseat. Success, C/L score, time to best view (TTBV), time to intubation (TTI), and number of attempts were measured. All participants were asked to rate their favored device. Results. Forty-two physicians participated. 100% of all intubations performed from the backseat were successful. Intubation success through the driver’s window was less successful. Only with the Airtraq® optical laryngoscope, 100% success was achieved. Best visualization (window C/L 2a; backseat C/L 2a) and shortest TTBV (window 4.7 s; backseat 4.1 s) were obtained when using the D-Blade video laryngoscope, but this was not associated with a higher success through the driver’s window. Fastest TTI was achieved through the window (14.2 s) when using the C-MAC video laryngoscope and from the backseat (7.3 s) when using a Macintosh blade. Conclusions. Video laryngoscopy revealed better results in visualization but was not associated with a higher success. Success depended on the approach and familiarity with the device. We believe that video laryngoscopy is suitable for securing airways in trapped accident victims. The decision for an optimal device is complicated and should be based upon experience and regular training with the device.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Metadaten
Author:Florian RaimannORCiDGND, Daniel Martin Tepperis, Dirk MeiningerORCiDGND, Kai ZacharowskiORCiDGND, Richard Schalk, Christian ByhahnGND, Christian Friedrich WeberORCiDGND, Haitham MutlakORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-518074
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9690839
ISSN:2090-2859
ISSN:2090-2840
Pubmed Id:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31662911
Parent Title (English):Emergency medicine international
Publisher:Hindawi
Place of publication:New York, NY [u. a.]
Contributor(s):Robert Derlet
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2019
Date of first Publication:2019/10/01
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2019/12/16
Volume:2019
Issue:Art. 9690839
Page Number:10
First Page:1
Last Page:9
Note:
Copyright © 2019 Florian J. Raimann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
HeBIS-PPN:459819194
Institutes:Medizin / Medizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds:Medizin
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0