Open Access

Gregor Gramlich

• We investigate unary regular languages and compare deterministic finite automata (DFA’s), nondeterministic finite automata (NFA’s) and probabilistic finite automata (PFA’s) with respect to their size. Given a unary PFA with n states and an e-isolated cutpoint, we show that the minimal equivalent DFA has at most n exp 1/2e states in its cycle. This result is almost optimal, since for any alpha < 1 a family of PFA’s can be constructed such that every equivalent DFA has at least n exp alpha/2e states. Thus we show that for the model of probabilistic automata with a constant error bound, there is only a polynomial blowup for cyclic languages. Given a unary NFA with n states, we show that efficiently approximating the size of a minimal equivalent NFA within the factor sqrt(n)/ln n is impossible unless P = NP. This result even holds under the promise that the accepted language is cyclic. On the other hand we show that we can approximate a minimal NFA within the factor ln n, if we are given a cyclic unary n-state DFA.