Open Access

Tomislav Ćužić

• U uvodu rada diferenciraju se morfološka (i „pravomorfološka”) i pravopisna norma, pri čemu se govori i o svojevrsnome paradoksu pravopisne norme. Metodom komparativne i kontrastivne analize u središnjem se dijelu rada raščlanjuju neki relevantni morfološki aspekti koji sudjeluju u definiranju pravopisnih načela i pravopisnih pravila. Cilj je rada osvješćivanje teorijsko-metodoloških aspekata kojima se naznačuju vidovi svojevrsna preklapanja morfologije i pravopisa, i to kroz prizmu hrvatske pravopisne norme, ali i norme nekih slavenskih jezika. U skladu s tim u zaključku se progovara o povezanosti pravopisne norme s morfološkom normom, odnosno kako posebnosti morfološke norme postaju pitanje pravopisne norme.
• The introduction section differentiates the morphological (and “orthomorphological”) and orthographic norm, emphasizing a kind of a paradox of the orthographic norm. In the central section of the paper, the comparative and contrastive analysis method is used to analyze several relevant morphological aspects included in the defining of orthographic principles and orthographic rules. The goal of the paper is to bring to awareness the theoretical and morphological aspects pointing to the permeation of a kind of morphology and orthography, all through the prism of Croatian orthographic norm, as well as the norm of some Slavic languages, primarily South Slavic. In accordance with the above, the conclusion discusses the complex relation between the grammatical/morphological norm and the orthographic norm, i.e. the way in which the specificities of the grammatical norm become an issue pertaining to the orthographic norm.