Latest documents http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/index/index/ Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:24:45 +0200 Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:24:45 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/8130 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/8130 Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:24:45 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/8128 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/8128 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:05:43 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/836 Während in den Vereinten Nationen mit mäßigem Erfolg um eine international akzeptierte Weltpolitik gerungen wird, haben sich in anderen gesellschaftlichen Bereichen längst globale vernetzte Strukturen entwickelt. Ansätze für eine Vielzahl von autonomen Zivilverfassungen, die die Welt umspannen, sind erkennbar – vom »cyberspace « bis zur Weltwirtschaft. Lassen sich mit den Grundsätzen der nationalstaatlichen Verfassungen auch die Herausforderungen angehen, die sich aus den drei aktuellen Trends – Digitalisierung, Privatisierung und globaler Vernetzung – ergeben? Ging es im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert im Nationalstaat darum, die Rechte des Einzelnen gegenüber dem Staat zu stärken und die Politik durch ihre Bindung an das Recht zu disziplinieren, so dreht es sich heute um Freisetzung und Disziplinierung ganz anderer globaler Dynamiken. Der Rechtssoziologe Prof. Dr. Gunther Teubner beschäftigt sich mit der Frage: Kann man die Traditionen der Nationalstaatsverfassung fruchtbar machen und sie zugleich so umdenken, dass sie den neuen Problemlagen gerecht werden? Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/836 Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:31:46 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1739 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1739 Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:16:39 +0100 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2730 Christoph Beat Graber; Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2730 Fri, 19 May 2006 16:36:29 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2726 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2726 Fri, 19 May 2006 16:08:17 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2725 The article connects two strands of the recent sociolegal debate: (1) the empirical discovery of new forms of spontaneous law in die Course of globalization, and (2) the emergence of deconstructive theories of law that undermine the law's hierarchy. The article puts forward the thesis that law's hierarchy has successfully resisted all old and new attempts at its deconstruction; it breaks, however, under the pressures of globalization that produced a global law without the state, as self-created law of global society that has no institutionalized support whatsoever in international poliucs and public international law. Consequently, the article criticizes deconstructive theories for their lack of autological analysis. These theories do not take into account the historical condicions of deconstruction. Accordingly, deconstructive analysis of law would have to look for new legal distinctions that are plausible under the new condicions of a doubly fragmented global society. The article sketches the contours of an emerging polycontextural law. Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2725 Fri, 19 May 2006 16:06:43 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2742 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2742 Fri, 12 May 2006 09:52:14 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2741 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2741 Fri, 12 May 2006 09:25:51 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2751 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2751 Fri, 12 May 2006 09:11:58 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2750 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2750 Fri, 12 May 2006 09:05:36 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2748 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2748 Fri, 12 May 2006 08:58:54 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2755 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2755 Fri, 12 May 2006 08:38:08 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2757 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2757 Fri, 12 May 2006 08:34:18 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2760 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2760 Thu, 11 May 2006 09:42:01 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2763 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2763 Thu, 11 May 2006 09:16:45 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2761 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2761 Thu, 11 May 2006 09:08:13 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3745 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3745 Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:41:48 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3766 In the current globalization debate the law appears to be entangled in economic and political developments which move into a new dimension of depoliticization, de-centralization and de-individualization. For all the correct observations in detail, though, this debate is bringing about a drastic (polit)economic reduction of the role of law in the globalization process that I wish to challenge in this paper. Here one has to take on Wallerstein’s misconception of “worldwide economies” according to which the formation of the global society is seen as a basically economic process. Autonomous globalization processes in other social spheres running parallel to economic globalization need to be taken seriously. In protest against such (polit)economic reductionism several strands of the debate, among them the neo-institutionalist theory of “global culture”, post-modern concepts of global legal pluralism, systems theory studies of differentiated global society and various versions of “global civil society” have shaped a concept of a polycentric globalization. From these angles the remarkable multiplicity of the world society, in which tendencies to re-politicization, re-regionalization and re-individualization are becoming visible at the same time, becomes evident. I shall contrast two current theses on the globalization of law with two less current counter-theses: First thesis: globalization is relevant for law because the emergence of global markets undermines the control potential of national policy, and therefore also the chances of legal regulation. First counter-thesis: globalization produces a set of problems intrinsic to law itself, consisting in a change to the dominant lawmaking processes. Second thesis: globalization means that the law institutionalizes the worldwide shift in power from governmental actors to economic actors. Second counter-thesis: globalization means that the law has a chance of contributing to a dual constitution of autonomous sectors of world society. Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3766 Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:09:23 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3893 Peer Zumbansen; Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3893 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:15:48 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3890 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3890 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:51:15 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3889 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3889 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:20:57 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3896 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3896 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:03:03 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3908 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3908 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:54:50 +0200 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/4125 Gunther Teubner article http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/4125 Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:37:19 +0200