<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OPUS 4 Latest Documents RSS Feed</title>
    <description>Latest documents</description>
    <link>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/index/index/</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:22:21 +0200</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:22:21 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Household debt and social interactions</title>
      <link>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/29653</link>
      <description>Debt-induced crises, including the subprime, are usually attributed exclusively to supply-side factors. We uncover an additional factor contributing to debt culture, namely social influences emanating from the perceived average income of peers. Using unique information from a representative household survey of the Dutch population that circumvents the need to define the social circle, we consider collateralized, consumer, and informal loans. We find robust social effects on borrowing – especially among those who consider themselves poorer than their peers – and on indebtedness, suggesting a link to financial distress. We check the robustness of our results using several approaches to rule out spurious associations and handle correlated effects.</description>
      <author>Dimitris Georgarakos; Michael Haliassos; Giacomo Pasini</author>
      <category>workingpaper</category>
      <guid>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/29653</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:22:21 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Household debt and social interactions</title>
      <link>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/24086</link>
      <description>Debt-induced crises, including the subprime, are usually attributed exclusively to supply-side factors. We examine the role of social influences on debt culture, emanating from perceived average income of peers. Utilizing unique information from a household survey representative of the Dutch population, that circumvents the issue of defining the social circle, we consider collateralized, consumer, and informal loans. We find robust social effects on borrowing, especially among those who consider themselves poorer than their peers; and on indebtedness, suggesting a link to financial distress. We employ a number of approaches to rule out spurious associations and to handle correlated effects.</description>
      <author>Dimitris Georgarakos; Michael Haliassos; Giacomo Pasini</author>
      <category>workingpaper</category>
      <guid>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/24086</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:29:07 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
