<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OPUS 4 Latest Documents RSS Feed</title>
    <description>Latest documents</description>
    <link>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/index/index/</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:44 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Monitoring cortical excitability during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in children with ADHD: a single-blind, sham-controlled TMS-EEG study</title>
      <link>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/27660</link>
      <description>Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows non-invasive stimulation of the human brain. However, no suitable marker has yet been established to monitor the immediate rTMS effects on cortical areas in children.&#13;
Objective: TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) could present a well-suited marker for real-time monitoring. Monitoring is particularly important in children where only few data about rTMS effects and safety are currently available.&#13;
Methods: In a single-blind sham-controlled study, twenty-five school-aged children with ADHD received subthreshold 1 Hz-rTMS to the primary motor cortex. The TMS-evoked N100 was measured by 64-channel-EEG pre, during and post rTMS, and compared to sham stimulation as an intraindividual control condition.&#13;
Results: TMS-evoked N100 amplitude decreased during 1 Hz-rTMS and, at the group level, reached a stable plateau after approximately 500 pulses. N100 amplitude to supra-threshold single pulses post rTMS confirmed the amplitude reduction in comparison to the pre-rTMS level while sham stimulation had no influence. EEG source analysis indicated that the TMS-evoked N100 change reflected rTMS effects in the stimulated motor cortex. Amplitude changes in TMS-evoked N100 and MEPs (pre versus post 1 Hz-rTMS) correlated significantly, but this correlation was also found for pre versus post sham stimulation.&#13;
Conclusion: The TMS-evoked N100 represents a promising candidate marker to monitor rTMS effects on cortical excitability in children with ADHD. TMS-evoked N100 can be employed to monitor real-time effects of TMS for subthreshold intensities. Though TMS-evoked N100 was a more sensitive parameter for rTMS-specific changes than MEPs in our sample, further studies are necessary to demonstrate whether clinical rTMS effects can be predicted from rTMS-induced changes in TMS-evoked N100 amplitude and to clarify the relationship between rTMS-induced changes in TMS-evoked N100 and MEP amplitudes. The TMS-evoked N100 amplitude reduction after 1 Hz-rTMS could either reflect a globally decreased cortical response to the TMS pulse or a specific decrease in inhibition.</description>
      <author>Christian Helfrich; Simone S. Pierau; Christine M. Freitag; Jochen Roeper; Ulf Ziemann; Stephan Bender</author>
      <category>article</category>
      <guid>http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/27660</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:44 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
