Refine
Document Type
- Article (15)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Keywords
- Allgemeinmedizin (1)
- Best-practice model (1)
- Case management (1)
- Colorectal cancer (1)
- Cross-sectional (1)
- E-Learning (1)
- Ethnicity (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Hard-to-reach population (1)
- Health care access (1)
Institute
- Predictors of dropout in the German disease management program for type 2 diabetes (2012)
- Background: To improve and assess the effectiveness of disease management programs (DMPs), it is critical to understand how many people drop out of disease management programs and why. Methods: We used routine data provided by a statutory health insurance fund from the regions North Rhine, North Wurttemberg and Hesse. As part of the German DMP for type 2 diabetes, the insurance fund received regular documentation of all members participating in the program. We followed 10,989 patients who enrolled in the DMP between July 2004 and December 2005 until the end of 2007 to study how many patients dropped out of the program. Dropout was defined based on the discontinuation of program documentation on a particular patient, excluding situations in which the patient died or left the insurance fund. Predictors of dropout, assessed at the time of program enrolment, were explored using logistic regression analysis. Results: 5.5% of the patients dropped out of the disease management program within the observation period. Predictors of dropout at the time of enrolment were: region; retirement status; the number of secondary diseases; presence of a disabling secondary disease; doctors recommendations to stop smoking or to seek nutritional counselling; and the completion and outcome of the routine foot and eye exams. Different trends of dropout were observed among retired and employed patients: retired patients of old age, who possibly drop out of the program due to other health care priorities and employed people of younger age who have not yet developed many secondary diseases, but were recommended to change their lifestyle. Conclusions: Overall, dropout rates for the German disease management programs for type 2 diabetes were low compared to other studies. Factors assessed at the time of program enrolment were predictive of later dropout and should be further studied to provide information for future program improvements.
- How to improve drug dosing for patients with renal impairment in primary care - a cluster-randomized controlled trial (2012)
- Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for inappropriate or potentially harmful prescribing. The aim of this study was to examine whether a multifaceted intervention including the use of a software programme for the estimation of creatinine clearance and recommendation of individual dosage requirements may improve correct dosage adjustment of relevant medications for patients with CKD in primary care. Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted between January and December 2007 in small primary care practices in Germany. Practices were randomly allocated to intervention or control groups. In each practice, we included patients with known CKD and elderly patients (>=70 years) suffering from hypertension. The practices in the intervention group received interactive training and were provided a software programme to assist with individual dose adjustment. The control group performed usual care. Data were collected at baseline and at 6 months. The outcome measures, analyzed across individual patients, included prescriptions exceeding recommended maximum daily doses, with the primary outcome being prescriptions exceeding recommended standard daily doses by 30% or more. Results: Data from 44 general practitioners and 404 patients are included. The intervention was effective in reducing prescriptions exceeding the maximum daily dose per patients, with a trend in reducing prescriptions exceeding the standard daily dose by more than 30%. Conclusions: A multifaceted intervention including the use of a software program effectively reduced inappropriately high doses of renally excreted medications in patients with CKD in the setting of small primary care practices.
- Jeder Fehler zählt : das Frankfurter Fehlerberichts- und Lernsystem für Hausarztpraxen (2007)
- Anderer Fehler sind gute Lehrer « – so lautet ein nur wenig bekanntes altes deutsches Sprichwort. Für medizinische Fehler galt das die längste Zeit nicht: entweder totgeschwiegen oder als »Kunstfehler « in das Licht der Öffentlichkeit gezerrt, entzogen sich ärztliche Fehler einer systematischen Analyse. Damit hat die Medizin lange eine wichtige Chance vertan. Am Institut für Allgemeinmedizin der Universität Frankfurt beschäftigt sich seit einigen Jahren ein Team unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. Ferdinand Gerlach intensiv mit der Fehlerforschung. ...
- Curriculares Semniar Evidenzbasierte Medizin am Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main (2005)
- Poster: Einführung Obwohl international die Integration der Evidenzbasierten Medizin (EbM) in die klinische Medizin und in die Ausbildung voranschreitet, ist die Verbreitung im deutschen Klinikalltag eine fortbestehende Herausforderung. Die Neue Ärzteapprobationsordnung bietet Möglichkeiten für innovative Konzepte im medizinischen Curriculum. Die selbstständige und systematische Informationssuche ist eine Kernkompetenz u.a. auch der hausärztlichen Tätigkeit. Zum Wintersemester 03/04 wurde in Frankfurt das erste curriculare Seminar EbM auf der Basis des peer-teaching eingeführt und wissenschaftlich begleitet. Methoden In Kleingruppenseminaren zu je 23 Studierenden des 2. klinischen Semesters wird an 4 Terminen ein Basiskurs EbM nach den Kriterien des Deutschen Netzwerkes für Evidenzbasierte Medizin e.V. durchgeführt. Dabei werden folgende E-Learning-Module erarbeitet: Internetrecherche, Diagnose und Therapie in tutorenunterstützten Kleingruppen. Jeder Studierende hat einen persönlichen Arbeitsplatz mit Internetzugang, um anfallende Recherchen nach externer Evidenz durchführen zu können. Ein individuelles Fallbeispiel (klinische Fragestellung) soll bearbeitet werden, zu dessen Beantwortung die internetgestützten Tools der evidenzbasierten Methode angewendet werden. Diese Seminararbeit wird im Rahmen eines "journal clubs" mit der Kleingruppe ausgewertet und evaluiert. Ergebnisse Die Akzeptanz des Seminars und der Wissenszuwachs durch evidenzbasiertes Arbeiten wurden durch Weberschock et al (2005) wissenschaftlich erfasst und zeigen positive Ergebnisse. Schlussfolgerung Das Seminar EbM ist auf elektronische Medien angewiesen. Vor allem das Modul Internetrecherche, ist eine essentielle Kompetenz für die ärztliche Tätigkeit und bedarf den sichern Umgang mit den entsprechenden internetgestützten Anwendungen.
- "Anamneseerhebung und Gesprächsführung" : Bedarfs- und Erwartungsanalyse bei Studierenden der Vorklinik als Grundlage für eine modulare Kurs-Neugestaltung (2007)
- Poster GMA-Jahrestagung 2006 : Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung - GMA. Köln, 10.-12.11.2006. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2006. Doc 06gma121 Fragestellung: Im Rahmen der neuen Approbationsordnung wird die Vermittlung kommunikativer Fähigkeiten ausdrücklich betont. Die derzeitige Ausbildung wird diesbezüglich als defizitär eingeschätzt (z.B. [1]). Aufgabe eines neuen Lehrprojektes an der Universität Frankfurt ist die Neukonzeption des vorklinischen Kurses "Einführung in die Klinische Medizin“. Dabei sollen insbesondere Module entwickelt werden, die den Studierenden eine fundierte Basisausbildung in ärztlicher Gesprächsführung und Anamnesetechnik bieten. Ein Ziel der Neukonzeption ist die nutzerorientierte Gestaltung der Module. Methode: Im Sommersemester 2006 wurde eine explorative Befragung (Kombination standardisierter Fragen und Freitext) von bisher 93 Studierenden des 4. vorklinischen Semesters nach Abschluss des Kurses "Einführung in die Klinische Medizin“ durchgeführt. Wünsche bezüglich ärztlicher Gesprächsführung sowie die Einschätzung der im derzeitigen Kurs erworbenen Kenntnisse und Fertigkeiten wurden mittels Fragebogen zur Selbsteinschätzung eruiert und deskriptiv ausgewertet. Ergebnisse: Vorläufige Ergebnisse zeigen, dass fast 100% der Befragten die Ausbildung in Gesprächsführung für ihren späteren Beruf als "wichtig“ oder "sehr wichtig“ erachten. Nach Abschluss des jetzigen Kurses schätzten jedoch fast alle Studierenden Ihre Fähigkeiten und theoretischen Kenntnisse selbstkritisch als defizitär ein. Die Studierenden präferieren folgende Unterrichtsmethoden (Mehrfachantworten möglich): über 90% Anamnesetraining mit echten Patienten, 50% Demonstration einer gelungenen Anamnese durch den Dozenten (Vorzeigeanamnese), 50% Rollenspiele, 40% Videoanalyse eines eigenen Anamnesegespräches. Schlussfolgerung und Ausblick: Die Neukonzeption wird die Bedürfnisse und Wünsche der Studierenden berücksichtigen und auch bislang nicht geplante Aspekte, z.B. "Vorzeigeanamnese“, beinhalten. Der Einfluß der Bedarfs- und Erwartungsanalyse auf die Neukonzeption der Module wird gesondert dargestellt. Nach Umgestaltung des vorklinischen Kurses sind aufbauende Module für den klinischen Abschnitt geplant.
- Case management for the treatment of patients with major depression in general practices – rationale, design and conduct of a cluster randomized controlled trial – PRoMPT (primary care monitoring for depressive patient's trial) [ISRCTN66386086] – Study protocol (2005)
- Background: Depression is a disorder with high prevalence in primary health care and a significant burden of illness. The delivery of health care for depression, as well as other chronic illnesses, has been criticized for several reasons and new strategies to address the needs of these illnesses have been advocated. Case management is a patient-centered approach which has shown efficacy in the treatment of depression in highly organized Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) settings and which might also be effective in other, less structured settings. Methods/Design: PRoMPT (PRimary care Monitoring for depressive Patients Trial) is a cluster randomised controlled trial with General Practice (GP) as the unit of randomisation. The aim of the study is to evaluate a GP applied case-management for patients with major depressive disorder. 70 GPs were randomised either to intervention group or to control group with the control group delivering usual care. Each GP will include 10 patients suffering from major depressive disorder according to the DSM-IV criteria. The intervention group will receive treatment based on standardized guidelines and monthly telephone monitoring from a trained practice nurse. The nurse investigates the patient's status concerning the MDD criteria, his adherence to GPs prescriptions, possible side effects of medication, and treatment goal attainment. The control group receives usual care – including recommended guidelines. Main outcome measure is the cumulative score of the section depressive disorders (PHQ-9) from the German version of the Prime MD Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D). Secondary outcome measures are the Beck-Depression-Inventory, self-reported adherence (adapted from Moriskey) and the SF-36. In addition, data are collected about patients' satisfaction (EUROPEP-tool), medication, health care utilization, comorbidity, suicide attempts and days out of work. The study comprises three assessment times: baseline (T0) , follow-up after 6 months (T1) and follow-up after 12 months (T2). Discussion: Depression is now recognized as a disorder with a high prevalence in primary care but with insufficient treatment response. Case management seems to be a promising intervention which has the potential to bridge the gap of the usually time-limited and fragmented provision of care. Case management has been proven to be effective in several studies but its application in the private general medical practice setting remains unclear.
- "Ein System der organisierten Verantwortungslosigkeit" : Prof. Ferdinand Gerlach kritisiert falsche Anreizsysteme und die Kluft zwischen ambulanter und stationärer Versorgung (2012)
- Prof. Ferdinand Gerlach im Gespräch mit FF-Redakteurin Dr. Anne Hardy.
- E-Learning in der allgemeinmedizinischen Ausbildung: zentrale Begleitung im dezentralen Praktikum ; Eine Evaluation (2005)
- E-Learning soll im Rahmen der allgemeinmedizinischen Ausbildung von Medizinstudierenden erprobt werden. Ein zielgruppenspezifisches, multimodulares Online-Angebot begleitet Medizinstudenten des 10. Semesters während ihres dezentralen Praktikums in hausärztlichen Praxen. Folgende Lehrziele werden angestrebt: (1) Einführung in das E-Learning, (2) Klinische Allgemeinmedizin - Online-Modul, (3) Chronic Care Online-Modul, (4) Online-Bewerbung. Die systematische Evaluation zeigt, dass E-Learning die Kommunikation der Studierenden untereinander und mit der universitären Lehreinheit während des Praktikum fördert. Auf der Grundlage der in diesem Pilotversuch gewonnenen Erfahrungen erscheint die Kombination mit Präsenzunterricht (Blended Learning) eine vielversprechende Option für die allgemeinmedizinische Ausbildung zu sein.
- Health-related quality of life among general practice patients with differing chronic diseases in Germany : cross sectional survey (2008)
- Background This study was carried out to compare the HRQoL of patients in general practice with differing chronic diseases with the HRQoL of patients without chronic conditions, to evaluate the HRQoL of general practice patients in Germany compared with the HRQoL of the general population, and to explore the influence of different chronic diseases on patients HRQoL, independently of the effects of multiple confounding variables. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire survey including the SF-36, the EQ-5D and demographic questions was conducted in 20 general practices in Germany. 1009 consecutive patients aged 15–89 participated. The SF-36 scale scores of general practice patients with differing chronic diseases were compared with those of patients without chronic conditions. Differences in the SF-36 scale/summary scores and proportions in the EQ-5D dimensions between patients and the general population were analyzed. Independent effects of chronic conditions and demographic variables on the HRQoL were analyzed using multivariable linear regression and polynomial regression models. Results The HRQoL for general practice patients with differing chronic diseases tended to show more physical than mental health impairments compared with the reference group of patients without. Patients in general practice in Germany had considerably lower SF-36 scores than the general population (P < 0.001 for all) and showed significantly higher proportions of problems in all EQ-5D dimensions except for the self-care dimension (P < 0.001 for all). The mean EQ VAS for general practice patients was lower than that for the general population (69.2 versus 77.4, P < 0.001). The HRQoL for general practice patients in Germany seemed to be more strongly affected by diseases like depression, back pain, OA of the knee, and cancer than by hypertension and diabetes. Conclusion General practice patients with differing chronic diseases in Germany had impaired quality of life, especially in terms of physical health. The independent impacts on the HRQoL were different depending on the type of chronic disease. Findings from this study might help health professionals to concern more influential diseases in primary care from the patient´s perspective.
- The systematic guideline review : method, rationale, and test on chronic heart failure (2009)
- Background Evidence-based guidelines potentially improve healthcare. However, their de-novo-development requires substantial resources - especially for complex conditions, and adaptation may be biased by contextually influenced recommendations in source guidelines. In this paper we describe a new approach to guideline development - the systematic guideline review method (SGR), and its application in the development of an evidence-based guideline for family physicians on chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods A systematic search for guidelines was carried out. Evidence-based guidelines on CHF management in adults in ambulatory care published in English or German between the years 2000 and 2004 were included. Guidelines on acute or right heart failure were excluded. Eligibility was assessed by two reviewers, methodological quality of selected guidelines was appraised using the AGREE-instrument, and a framework of relevant clinical questions for diagnostics and treatment was derived. Data were extracted into evidence tables, systematically compared by means of a consistency analysis and synthesized in a preliminary draft. Most relevant primary sources were re-assessed to verify the cited evidence. Evidence and recommendations were summarized in a draft guideline. Results Of 16 included guidelines five were of good quality. A total of 35 recommendations were systematically compared: 25/35 were consistent, 9/35 inconsistent, and 1/35 unratable (derived from a single guideline). Of the 25 consistencies, 14 based on consensus, seven on evidence and four differed in grading. Major inconsistencies were found in 3/9 of the inconsistent recommendations. We re-evaluated the evidence for 17 recommendations (evidence-based, differing evidence levels and minor inconsistencies) the majority was congruent. Incongruencies were found, where the stated evidence could not be verified in the cited primary sources, or where the evaluation in the source guidelines focused on treatment benefits and underestimated the risks. The draft guideline was completed in 8.5 man-months. The main limitation to this study was the lack of a second reviewer. Conclusions The systematic guideline review including framework development, consistency analysis and validation is an effective, valid, and resource saving-approach to the development of evidence-based guidelines.
