- Sex-stratified genome-wide association studies including 270,000 individuals show sexual dimorphism in genetic loci for anthropometric traits (2013)
- Men and women differ substantially regarding height, weight, and body fat. Interestingly, previous work detecting genetic effects for waist-to-hip ratio, to assess body fat distribution, has found that many of these showed sex-differences. However, systematic searches for sex-differences in genetic effects have not yet been conducted. Therefore, we undertook a genome-wide search for sexually dimorphic genetic effects for anthropometric traits including 133,723 individuals in a large meta-analysis and followed promising variants in further 137,052 individuals, including a total of 94 studies. We identified seven loci with significant sex-difference including four previously established (near GRB14/COBLL1, LYPLAL1/SLC30A10, VEGFA, ADAMTS9) and three novel anthropometric trait loci (near MAP3K1, HSD17B4, PPARG), all of which were significant in women, but not in men. Of interest is that sex-difference was only observed for waist phenotypes, but not for height or body-mass-index. We found no evidence for sex-differences with opposite effect direction for men and women. The PPARG locus is of specific interest due to its link to diabetes genetics and therapy. Our findings demonstrate the importance of investigating sex differences, which may lead to a better understanding of disease mechanisms with a potential relevance to treatment options.
- Can the ψ(4040) explain the peak associated with Y(4008)? (2019)
- We study the well-known resonance ψ(4040), corresponding to a 33S1 charm–anticharm vector state ψ(3S), within a QFT approach, in which the decay channels into DD, D∗D, D∗D∗, DsDs and D∗s Ds are considered. The spectral function shows sizable deviations from a Breit–Wigner shape (an enhancement, mostly generated by DD∗loops, occurs); moreover, besides the c ¯ c pole of ψ(4040), a second dynamically generated broad pole at 4 GeV emerges. Naively, it is tempting to identify this new pole with the unconfirmed state Y (4008). Yet, this state was not seen inthe reaction e+e− → ψ(4040) → DD∗, but in processes with π+π−J/ψ in the final state. A detailed study shows a related but different mechanism: a broad peak at 4GeV in the process e+e− → ψ(4040) → DD∗ → π+π−J/ψ appears when DD∗ loops are considered. Its existence in this reaction is not necessarily connected to the existence of a dynamically generated pole, but the underlying mechanism – the strong coupling of c ¯ c to DD∗ loops – can generate both of them. Thus, the controversial state Y (4008) may not be a genuine resonance, but a peak generated by the ψ(4040) and D∗D loops with π+π−J/ψ in the final state.
