-
Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
(2012)
- The present study investigates the effects of trait anxiety on the neural efficiency of working memory component functions (manipulation vs. maintenance) in the absence of threat-related stimuli. For the manipulation of affectively neutral verbal information held in working memory, high- and low-anxious individuals (N = 46) did not differ in their behavioral performance, yet trait anxiety was positively related to the neural effort expended on task processing, as measured by BOLD signal changes in fMRI. Higher levels of anxiety were associated with stronger activation in two regions implicated in the goal-directed control of attention--that is, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left inferior frontal sulcus--and with stronger deactivation in a region assigned to the brain's default-mode network--that is, rostral-ventral anterior cingulate cortex. Furthermore, anxiety was associated with a stronger functional coupling of right DLPFC with ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. We interpret our findings as reflecting reduced processing efficiency in high-anxious individuals and point out the need to consider measures of functional integration in addition to measures of regional activation strength when investigating individual differences in neural efficiency. With respect to the functions of working memory, we conclude that anxiety specifically impairs the processing efficiency of (control-demanding) manipulation processes (as opposed to mere maintenance). Notably, this study contributes to an accumulating body of evidence showing that anxiety also affects cognitive processing in the absence of threat-related stimuli.
-
Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of cognitive processing
(2011)
- The current work investigated the association of trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of cognitive processing for affectively neutral (not threat-related) information. In a sample of 46 healthy volunteers, three fMRI experiments were conducted to test the prediction derived from attentional control theory (Eysenck et al., 2007) that high as compared to low trait-anxious individuals expend more neural effort on tasks requiring the top-down control of attention to reach a given level of performance. In a colour-word Stroop task requiring the inhibition of irrelevant stimulus information and associated responses as well as in a working-memorymanipulation task requiring the shifting of attention between items in working memory, trait anxiety (as measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; Spielberger et al., 1970) was positively associated with task-related increases in the activation of two adjacent regions in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The finding that along with a stronger activation of this brain region commonly implicated in top-down control processes, the high-anxious subjects showed equal (working memory manipulation) or worse (Stroop) performance when compared to low-anxious subjects, does support the assumption that processing is less efficient in the high anxious. However, in contrast to the predictions, trait anxiety did not show a significant association with task-related brain activation in a task-switching paradigm requiring shifting between task sets. It is discussed how different attentional control demands of the task may account for differences in the effects of trait anxiety on overt behavioural performance and underlying neural processes. In addition to DLPFC activation, trait anxiety modulated the functional connectivity of distributed regions involved in processing of the Stroop and the working-memory-manipulation task. It is discussed how the observed differences in regional DLPFC activation and network connectivity relate to each other. A possible interpretation suggests that activation increases in the DLPFC reflect an attempt to compensate for suboptimal connectivity by investing more effort in prefrontally supported control processes. Overall, the current work shows an association of trait anxiety with the neural efficiency of cognitive processing in affectively neutral tasks involving attentional control. Furthermore, it suggests that investigations of neural efficiency should take into account difference in functional integration in addition to regional activation.
