Refine
Document Type
- Article (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Augenerkrankungen (1)
- Education (1)
- Eye diseases (1)
- EyesiNet (1)
- Lehre (1)
- Netzhaut (1)
- Retina (1)
- Student (1)
- diabetic macular edema (1)
- fluocinolone acetonide (1)
Institute
- Medizin (4)
Introduction: For management of complicated retinal detachments, a pars plana vitrectomy with temporary silicone oil (SO) fill is the method of choice. According to literature, the retinal redetachment rate varies between <10% and >70% with around 36% in our own group (retrospective data analysis, n = 119 eyes).
Methods: The main goal was to reduce the retinal redetachment rate. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) and evaluation protocols (EVALPs) were developed to prospectively analyse risk factors. Lab analysis of SO was performed, and the role of surgical experience was evaluated and investigated with Eyesi®.
Results: We achieved a significant reduction of the retinal redetachment rate (to 6.80%, n = 101, p = 0.002). After surgery with SO injection, neither further membrane peeling (in 16.5%) nor retinal laser coagulation (in 100%) during revision surgery had a significant effect on the reattachment rate (p = 0.167, p = 0.23), while extensive additional laser coagulation reduced visual acuity (p = 0.01). A 3-port approach had to be set up to complete SO removal. A difference in success rate depending on surgical experience was confirmed, and the performance in Eyesi correlated with that in the patients' eye.
Conclusions: A SOP- and EVALP-based management and new strategies to secure the surgical performance seem to be essential for successful surgery.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of the virtual reality training simulator Eyesi to prepare surgeons for performing pars plana vitrectomies and its potential to predict the surgeons’ performance.
Methods: In a preparation phase, four participating vitreoretinal surgeons performed repeated simulator training with predefined tasks. If a surgeon was assigned to perform a vitrectomy for the management of complex retinal detachment after a surgical break of at least 60 hours it was randomly decided whether a warmup training on the simulator was required (n = 9) or not (n = 12). Performance at the simulator was measured using the built-in scoring metrics. The surgical performance was determined by two blinded observers who analyzed the video-recorded interventions. One of them repeated the analysis to check for intra-observer consistency. The surgical performance of the interventions with and without simulator training was compared. In addition, for the surgeries with simulator training, the simulator performance was compared to the performance in the operating room.
Results: Comparing each surgeon’s performance with and without warmup trainingshowed a significant effect of warmup training onto the final outcome in the operating room. For the surgeries that were preceeded by the warmup procedure, the performance at the simulator was compared with the operating room performance. We found that there is a significant relation. The governing factor of low scores in the simulator were iatrogenic retinal holes, bleedings and lens damage. Surgeons who caused minor damage in the simulation also performed well in the operating room.
Conclusions: Despite the large variation of conditions, the effect of a warmup training as well as a relation between the performance at the simulator and in the operating room was found with statistical significance. Simulator training is able to serve as a warmup to increase the average performance.
Purpose: There are little or no published data comparing the outcomes of ILUVIEN® (0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide [FAc]) and OZURDEX® (0.7 mg dexamethasone [DEX]) implants in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), and this case sought to compare their outcomes.
Methods: This case was extracted from a monocentric audit involving a pool of 25 patients (33 eyes) with DME and treated with a single FAc implant between October 2013 and December 2016. This case, a 61-year-old male with a pseudophakic lens, is from a patient that had received 4 intravitreal injections of a DEX implant prior to FAc implant and then was monitored for 3 years until re-treatment with a second FAc implant. Parameters measured included visual acuity (VA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure (IOP).
Results: After the DEX implants, CRT transiently improved. In March 2014, the decision was taken to administer an FAc implant, and this led to a reduction in CRT below 300 µm (from a baseline of 748 µm), and this was sustained for 30 months. VA remained above 65 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters to month 36, after which time a second FAc implant (in April 2017) was administered due to recurrence of edema and CRT decreased to below 300 µm and VA improved to 70 letters. Side effects included elevated IOP, which was effectively managed with IOP-lowering drops.
Conclusion: A single injection of FAc implant led to sustained improvements in CRT and VA that lasted for between 30 and 36 months, which is in contrast to the DEX implant where re-treatment was generally required within 6–7 months. After 36 months, re-treatment with the FAc implant again led to improved VA and CRT, and responses that were similar to those achieved with the first FAc implant.
Hintergrund: Die Ophthalmoskopie ist Bestandteil des medizinischen Curriculums, jedoch das Vermitteln der Inhalte oft unbefriedigend, da ein systematisches Lernen von Pathologien und deren Behandlungen dadurch erschwert ist, dass oftmals das passende Patientengut nicht zur Verfügung steht und dadurch gesunde Studenten einander untersuchen müssen. Aus diesem Grund haben wir eine Online-Plattform entwickelt, die in Kombination mit simulationsgestütztem Training sowohl das eigenständige als auch das angeleitete Lernen von Untersuchungsmethoden und Pathologien ermöglicht.
Ziel der Arbeit: Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war, ein Format für die Verbesserung der Lehre der direkten und indirekten Ophthalmoskopie im Studierendenunterricht zu evaluieren. Dabei wurden praktische Übungen an Virtual-Reality-basierten Simulatoren mit neu entwickelten und an den Lehrkatalog angepassten theoretischen Inhalten in der Online-Plattform EyesiNet verschränkt.
Material und Methoden: Die Studierenden bearbeiteten am ersten sowie am letzten Praktikumstag zufällig ausgewählte Fälle, die ihnen von den Eyesi Direct- und Eyesi Indirect-Simulatoren präsentiert wurden. Zwischen diesen beiden Einheiten konnten sie sich auf freiwilliger Basis mit den theoretischen Grundlagen typischer ophthalmologischer Krankheitsbilder im EyesiNet beschäftigen.
Ergebnisse: Eyesi Direct: Die Bewertung des Simulators ergab am ersten Praktikumstag für beide Gruppen keinen signifikant unterschiedlichen Wissensstand (p = 0,29). In der Gruppe OHNE Training (n = 54) ergab sich am letzten Praktikumstag mit p = 0,02 eine signifikante Verbesserung dieser Bewertung, jedoch mit einer geringen Effektgröße von 0,1. In der Gruppe MIT Training (n = 32) konnte mit p = 0,0004 eine hoch signifikante Verbesserung mit einer Effektgröße von 0,3 nach Rosenthal festgestellt werden. Eyesi Indirect: Die simulatorgestützte Bewertung ergab am ersten Praktikumstag keinen signifikanten Unterschied im Wissensstand der beiden Gruppen (p = 0,1). Nach dem Training schnitten zwar beide Gruppen etwas besser ab, jedoch ohne signifikanten Unterschied (OHNE Training p = 0,41/MIT Training p = 0,17).
Diskussion: Die Online-Plattform EyesiNet unterstützt beim Erlernen der wichtigsten Erkrankungsbilder. Lerninhalte werden reproduzierbar und auf für alle Lernenden standardisierte Weise zur Verfügung gestellt. Die Fertigkeiten der direkten Ophthalmoskopie sind hierbei deutlich schneller als die der indirekten Ophthalmoskopie zu erlernen.