7 search hits
-
Toward a uniform account of scrambling and clitic doubling
(1997)
-
Artemis Alexiadou
Elena Anagnostopoulou
- A commonly held view in the literature on Scrambling and Clitic Doubling is that both constructions are sensitive to Specificity. For this reason Sportiche (1992) proposes to unify the two, an approach which has become quite standard in the relevant literature ever since. However, the claim that clitic doubling is the counterpart of Germanic scrambling has never been substantiated. In this paper we present extensive evidence from Greek that Clitic Doubling has common formal properties with Germanic Scrambling/Object Shift. Our evidence consists mainly of binding facts observed when doubling takes place, which seem, at first sight, to be completely unexpected. On closer inspection, however, it turns out that these facts are strongly reminiscent of the effects showing up in Germanic scrambling. We propose that these properties can be derived under a theory of clitic constructions along the lines of Sportiche (1992) implemented into the framework of Chomsky (1995). Finally we suggest the that the crosslinguistic distribution of Scrambling as opposed to Clitic Doubling should be linked to a parameter relating to properties of Agr: Move/Merge XP vs. Move/Merge X° to Agr. We show that this parameter unifies the behaviour of subjects and objects within a language and across languages. The paper is organised as follows. In section 2 we present evidence from binding, interpretational and prosodic effects that doubling and scrambling display very similar properties. In section 3 we present Sportiches account and point out some problems for it. In section 4 we present our proposal.
-
Lexical information from a minimalist point of view
(1997)
-
Manfred Bierwisch
- Simplicity as a methodological orientation applies to linguistic theory just as to any other field of research: ‘Occam’s razor’ is the label for the basic heuristic maxim according to which an adequate analysis must ultimately be reduced to indispensible specifications. In this sense, conceptual economy has been a strict and stimulating guideline in the development of Generative Grammar from the very beginning. Halle’s (1959) argument discarding the level of taxonomic phonemics in order to unify two otherwise separate phonological processes is an early characteristic example; a more general notion is that of an evaluation metric introduced in Chomsky (1957, 1975), which relates the relative simplicity of alternative linguistic descriptions systematically to the quest for explanatory adequacy of the theory underlying the descriptions to be evaluated. Further proposals along these lines include the theory of markedness developed in Chomsky and Halle (1968), Kean (1975, 1981), and others, the notion of underspecification proposed e.g. in Archangeli (1984), Farkas (1990), the concept of default values and related notions. An important step promoting this general orientation was the idea of Principles and Parameters developed in Chomsky (1981, 1986), which reduced the notion of language particular rule systems to universal principles, subject merely to parametrization with restricted options, largely related to properties of particular lexical items. On this account, the notion of a simplicity metric is to be dispensed with, as competing analyses of relevant data are now supposed to be essentially excluded by the restrictive system of principles.
-
Coreference in dialogue
(1997)
-
Gerd Fritz
- Since the early days of discourse analysis coreference has always been considered a major factor in the formation of texts and dialogues. The repetition of nominal elements and the anaphoric use of pronouns in successive sentences is a fundamental cohesive pattern which ties sentences together and contributes to the coherence of sequences. "La coherence transphrastique trouve dans la pronominalisation un des procedes les plus efficaces" (Stati 1990, 160). The basic structural pattern on which linguists focused their interest in the early 1970s is captured by the following examples: (1) A man entered the house. After closing the door, the man sat down. He was tired. (2) Peter The man entered the house. He was tired. He ...
-
Morphology: the analysis of word structure
(1997)
-
William O'Grady
Videa P. De Guzman
- Part of linguistic competence involves the ability to construct and interpret words. The average high school student knows about 60,000 words whose form and meaning are not derived from those of other words. Such words including read, language, on, cold, and if, to name but a few - must be learned and stored as separate items in the lexicon (or mental dictionary). However, countless other words can be constructed and comprehended by the application of quite general rules to more basic words. For example, any speaker of English who knows the meaning of the noun fax - and the verb derived from it - could form and interpret words such as faxable (for things that can be faxed) and fax machine (for the device that sends and receives faxes). The system of categories and rules involved in word formation and interpretation is called morphology. This chapter presents an introduction to the study of morphology, beginning with the inventory of notions relevant to the analysis of word structure.
-
Der alemannische Konjunktiv II zwischen Morphologie und Syntax : zur Neuordnung des Konjunktivsystems nach dem Präteritumschwund
(1997)
-
Damaris Nübling
- In keinem anderen deutschen Dialektraum, nicht einmal in irgend einer anderen germanischen Sprache ist das Präteritum mit einer solchen Ausnahmslosigkeit geschwunden wie im Oberdeutschen und hier insbesondere im Alemannischen. Zwar haben (wie das Alemannische auch) alle diese Sprachen und Dialekte ein analytisches Perfekt ausgebildet; in einigen Sprachen (wie dem Englischen und Schwedischen) treten Präteritum und Perfekt in eine aspektuelle Opposition zueinander.
-
Reglementierte Kreativität bei der Schaffung neuer Familiennamen : zu den Prinzipien von Namenwahl und Namenwandel in Schweden
(1997)
-
Damaris Nübling
- Eigennamen stehen in einem vielfältigen Spannungsverhältnis zu Appellativen: Auf der einen Seite entwickeln sie sich fast immer aus - meist konkreten - Gattungsbezeichnungen (Eichstätt, Lindenstraße, Schneider), auf der anderen Seite besteht ihre Hauptfunktion - ganz im Gegensatz zu den Appellativen - in ihrer Monoreferentialität, d.h. in einem 1: 1- Bezug zu nur einem einzigen außersprachlichen Objekt (meist Örtlichkeiten im weitesten Sinn und Personen).
-
Theoretical approaches to language acquisition
(1997)
-
John N. Bohannon
John D. Bonvillian
