BDSL-Klassifikation: 02.00.00 Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft > 02.10.00 Sprache im 20. Jahrhundert. Gegenwartssprache
Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (9) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Review (1)
Language
- German (8)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (9)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (9)
Keywords
- Deutsch (8)
- Phraseologie (2)
- Tschechisch (2)
- Angst (1)
- Angst <Motiv> (1)
- Arbeitskreis Linguistische Pragmatik (1)
- Arbeitstagung (1)
- Bedeutung (1)
- Bildersprache (1)
- Emotion (1)
Institute
Die jährlich im Vorfeld der DGfS-Tagung veranstaltete Arbeitstagung Linguistische Pragmatik fand 2012 vor besonderem Hintergrund statt: Es war zugleich die erste Jahrestagung des neu gegründeten, seit 01.01.2012 bestehenden Vereins Arbeitskreis Linguistische Pragmatik. Zu diesem Anlass haben die Organisatoren (Constanze Spieß, Elke Diedrichsen und Jörg Bücker) ein Rahmenthema gewählt, das pragmatisch orientierte Linguistinnen und Linguisten der verschiedensten Forschungsrichtungen zusammenbringt: Sprachkritik und Sprachwandel. ...
Das Hauptziel dieses Beitrags besteht darin, anhand einer tiefergehenden prosodisch-phonologischen Analyse der häufigsten Rufnamen von 1945-2008 der Frage nachzugehen, ob im Laufe der Zeit eine Androgynisierung unserer Rufnamen dahingehend stattgefunden hat, dass Strukturen, die bislang dominant für das eine Geschlecht galten, zunehmend auch für das andere Geschlecht gewählt werden bzw. geschlechtspräferente Strukturen nivelliert oder gar abgebaut werden. Ein weiteres Ziel besteht darin, auf onymischer Ebene der These nachzugehen, dass in verschiedenen gesellschaftlichen Bereichen eine sog. Informalisierung und Intimisierung stattgefunden habe, die sich möglicherweise in heutigen Namen wie Lilly oder Nico statt früher Elisabeth und Nikolaus niederschlagen.
This article focuses on the means of expressing emotionality in internet commentaries written in German and Czech; the commentaries consist of reactions to news items on political topics. The author applies a contrastive approach. Politics is a field holding a strong potential for emotionality, which significantly affects text production. Internet commentaries in German and Czech are characterized by the use of verbal and non-verbal means that are typical of "cyberslang". The article also focuses on emotional nomination (of politicians and parties), offers a comparison of the cognitive concepts underlying this nomination in both languages, and examines the means of expressing the emotion "anger" - which is closely related to politics.
The paper presents an analysis and a comparison of the meanings and functions of proverbs in two editorials by the lawyer and journalist Dr Jakob Eben. The texts comment on the situation and the relations between nationalities in the Habsburg Monarchy in July 1880. One proverb is used in its normal form by the author (directly), while the other appears in a modified form, in a quotation (indirectly). In both cases the proverbs are used as part of a persuasive strategy in the text type of the editorial, for the purpose of provoking antipathy against the "others", i.e. the Czech politicians as political rivals, by means of their negative characteristics. In their specific co-text and context, the proverbs acquire additional semantic-pragmatic components of meaning, enabling them to participate in various isotopic chains and to contribute significantly to textual coherence. Additionally, their positioning marks important points in the argumentative structure of the text. The analysis also indicates some possibilities for the specification of semantic and pragmatic information in dictionaries.
This article examines the expression and description of fear in German and Czech phraseology. Fear – one of the primary emotions – is viewed in a broad sense. The analysis of this semantic field also includes such variations as anxiety, panic, fright, horror, and terror. As it is impossible to cover the full phraseological range for this semantic field in both languages, the boundaries of the corpus were set with reference to the repertoire of expressions included in selected phraseological dictionaries. The use of these idiomatic expressions in practice was verified with reference to large-scale corpora in the individual languages. The article offers an analysis of the corpus from a cognitive perspective. For each of the languages, the first step was to identify the concepts which are mediated via selected phraseological expressions. The concepts were then compared, revealing similarities and differences between German and Czech in this respect.