Journal of religious culture = Journal für Religionskultur
Refine
Year of publication
- 1997 (14) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (14)
Has Fulltext
- yes (14)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (14)
Institute
13
I am proposing to deal with my subject "Minorities in a Democracy with special reference to India" under the following heads: A Recent Case; Nature and Relationship, Formation and Responses; Concluding Remarks. I. A Recent Case I became a member of the National Commission for Minorities on 3rd of December, 1996. This means I have now already served more than eleven months in this office. One of the ex-ercises, which I undertook during these eleven months, was to pay as many as visits to differ-ent states of India. Already I have covered about 16 states and Union Territories. One of the most recent visits was to my home state Panjab from October 21-25, 1997. The case with which I am going to share with you was the one with which I was faced unexpectedly during this visit. ...
4
Many religious people believe that the integration of world society is of the greatest importance for mankind. They think that the religions of the world should strive to attain this goal through multi-religious agreement, through inter-religious dialogue, even through the merger of their organisations. Religious unification is supposed to be an effective instrument to encourage world society and to guarantee social peace. Religious differentiation, however, is dubious to these people. It would lead to social splintering and would ultimately be anti-social and extremely dangerous, especially to the economic unification of the world. The people who advocate religious unification look upon the progressing cultural, political and economic unification of the world as a model for religious unity. Therefore, many religious people believe that a unified global religion, or at least a union of world religions, should be implemented today. Options of this kind, however, are utopian in the extreme - confronting the ever-expanding conflicts between the established international religious organisations. Pragmatists who espouse the doctrine of religious unification therefore propagate the following fundamental tenets: 1. All religious people believe in the same god or whatever the ultimate reality may be called. 2. Each religion may believe in the ultimate reality in its own way. 3. No religious community is allowed to make converts. 4. Everybody should remain in his original religious community forever. These tenets are in reality nothing but a kind of a cartel agreement. And this agreement should establish an inter-religious combine, which had to stop competition between the religious organisations and to prevent the individual to leave his original religion. The basic supposition of this concept, however, is that religion today has mainly to be seen as an organised, congregational and institutionalised one. And because of this historical error they are only interested to keep the status quo of the established religious organisations. The propagation of that cartel agreement is rooted in the fear, that the established religions wouldn't survive the radical religious revolution at the end of the 20th century.
5 b
Modern Hindus use the term 'Hindu' in a positive sense. It is no more a derogatory appellation used by foreigners and oppressors, but a powerful self chosen name. The historically most valid ideologue of that positive Hindu understanding is Narendra Nath Datta (1863-1902). This highly talented son of a regarded lawyer family in Calcutta became disciple of Ramakrishna, the flaming son and priest of the goddess Kali and greatest religious virtuoso in the 19th century. Becoming a sannyasin Narendra received the title and name Swami Vivekananda; after the death of his master he set up the famous Ramakrishna Order. ...
7
"Die indischen Götzen, die sind mir ein Greuel", soll Goethe, der übrigens dem Islam durchaus zugetan war, ungestraft von sich gegeben haben. Sollte er wirklich viel von dem gewußt und begriffen haben, was er da voreilig diffamierte? Oder muß man ihm das Diktum B. Brechts aus dessen "Leben des Galilei" zugute halten: "Es ist nicht alles groß, /was ein großer Mann tut, / Und Galilei aß gern gut"?! Wir jedenfalls sind weder Goethe noch leben wir in einer ähnlichen Epoche solch diffuser Unkenntnis, wie sie vor und um 1800 über Indien und das, was wir heute unter "Hinduismus" verstehen, in Deutschland bestanden hat. Heute müssen und können wir uns in die Lage versetzen, differenziertere Urteile, Auskünfte und gut begründete Einschätzungen über die Grundstruktur des sinnstiftenden Systems des Hinduismus abzugeben, dem sich immerhin zehn bis fünfzehn Prozent der Weltbevölkerung zuzurechnen pflegen. ...