The Salamanca Working Paper Series
'The School of Salamanca. A Digital Collection of Sources and a Dictionary of its Juridical-Political Language' is a project building a digital text corpus including more than 120 works of the Salmantine jurists and theologians in selected prints from the 16th and 17th centuries and a complementary historic dictionary of circa 300 essential terms of the Salmantine School's juridic-politic language, bringing together international and interdisciplinary research perspectives. It is funded by the Academy of Sciences and Literature, Mainz, and hosted at the Max-Planck-Institute for European Legal History and the Institute of Philosophy at Goethe-University, both in Frankfurt/Main.
The Project's peer-reviewed Working Paper Series aims to reflect the thematic and disciplinary variety of the School and the transnational history of its reception. It features research articles by the project staff as well as of other authors.
More information is available at http://salamanca.adwmainz.de/
Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (15)
Has Fulltext
- yes (15)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (15)
Keywords
- School of Salamanca (3)
- Domingo de Soto (2)
- 16. Jahrhundert (1)
- 16th Century (1)
- 16th century (1)
- 16th-17th century (1)
- 17th century (1)
- Alfonso de Castro (1)
- Alonso de la Veracruz (1)
- American Indians (1)
2015, 2
El propósito de este artículo es discutir, en un primero momento, en que medida los maestros vinculados a la Universidad de Salamanca y a su correspondiente Escuela de Salamanca contribuyeron para la validación de un saber relacionado a los descubrimientos que permitió pensar una nueva configuración geográfica de la Tierra. En un segundo momento, mostraremos como la universidad salmantina, junto con otras instituciones de saber, operaron como un centro de actividad ‘científica’ que estuve a servicio de los proyectos de la monarquía española.
2019, 02
This paper focuses on the life and work of three of the most important men who arrived in the Philippines during the 16th century: the Augustinian Martín de Rada (1533–1578) studied at the universities of Paris and Salamanca. He was one of the best European scientists of his time in East Asia. The Dominican Domingo de Salazar (1512–1594), first bishop of Manila, studied the legitimacy of the conquest of the Philippines and wrote against the Spanish plan to conquest China. The Dominican Juan Cobo (? –1592) was the first Spanish to master the Chinese language and, through his book Shilu, the first European who introduced Christianity to the Chinese from a rational point of view and the first one to introduce European science into Chinese context. All of them were very influenced by the School of Salamanca and, from Manila, they always had their eyes on China. These three men of the late 16th century are paradigmatic examples of the influence of the University of Salamanca in the production of global knowledge in the early modernity.
2015, 4
El artículo, después de haber tratado la cuestión del tiranicidio en Tomás de Aquino y en Bartolo de Sassoferrato, muestra cómo Francisco de Vitoria, consciente de las soluciones que ofrecen los autores anteriores a él, afronta el argumento de forma innovadora, aunque en línea con la tradición anterior. En la base de la solución que propone Vitoria, se encuentra, en efecto, la afirmación de un derecho a la auto-defensa, entendido como derecho natural inalienable que reside en los individuos y en las comunidades; un derecho que siempre lo pueden ejercer los súbditos en relación con un gobernante que se convierte en tirano. Vitoria expresa de este modo el principio de resistencia a la autoridad injusta e ilegal en los términos de un derecho subjetivo, el de la auto-defensa, pero, al mismo tiempo, señala los límites afirmando la necesidad de cada individuo de respetar y someterse a un orden de justicia objetivo. De aquí su prohibición a un particular de matar a un hombre, aunque sea un tirano, sin un justo procedimiento jurídico. Así pues, el artículo muestra, a través del debate sobre la licitud del tiranicidio cómo en la obra de Vitoria se encuentra una teoría sólida de la soberanía juntamente con la afirmación tenaz de derechos naturales individuales. En efecto, Vitoria retoma, por una parte, una tradición de pensamiento para la que la formación de las sociedades políticas era la consecuencia de la sociabilidad natural de los hombres; y por otra, desarrollaba una teoría coherente de los derechos subjetivos a partir de la necesidad misma de los individuos de asociarse los unos con los otros para los fines de una vida éticamente justa y gratificante.
2018, 3
The School of Salamanca, and Iberian late Scholasticism in general, had the merit of transposing the wisdom of medieval scholasticism into the coordinates of early modernity. Due to the economic growth after the discovery of America, economic terms and moral problems become a central focus for moral theologians. In this article, I consider important key economic concepts that deliver a surprising wealth of insights into the modernization brought about by the leading scholars of the time. Social mobility, the principle of majority decision, the inviolability of property, human rights of the person, limited political power of the pope, and other key concepts that were decisive for the development of democracy and modernity are to be found in the works of the School of Salamanca in connection with economic issues.
2014, 2
Luis de Molina (1535-1600) grants slaves a legal status through which they can take up a position with respect to their masters between equivalent legal entity and legal object. Here, what is decisive is the figure of the subjective right, which both for Molina and modern proponents of this legal concept describes the 'right per se'. According to Molina's definition of ius, the denial of a subjective right or the hindrance of exercising an individual right represents an injustice. The rights granted to a slave in virtue of his being regarded a human being (despite the condition of slavery) serve to protect the slave against unjust acts. Molina does not distinguish the slave as a legal entity as separate from his master insofar as the slave should be protected against injustices committed against him or his property; injustices for which he would be entitled to compensation. Yet, the slave is not able to stake his claim to a particular right because it is not possible for him to take the matter to court. His natural law justified coequal legal status with respect to his master is limited in such a way by the positive legal order (by means of which slavery is generally made possible) that he is to be held legally incompetent as a legal entity with regard to defending and enforcing his 'qua homo'-legal rights. This precarious situation is due to the complicated legal intermediate position of a human legal entity, which, at the same time, represents the legal object of another person.