Part of a Book
Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (22) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (22)
Keywords
- Fremdsprachenlernen (22) (remove)
Institute
- Extern (10)
In this study, the student mistakes, in the collaborative writing project, will be discussed. The texts written in the computer lab are sent to the instructor through internet and the teacher underlines the mistakes made by learners and sends the texts back to the students. The students get feedback both from teachers and from peers when they are writing and correcting their mistakes. Since the learners are either in their preparatory or 1st year, the common mistakes made by the students are incorrect structure usage, inappropriate linguistic use, overgeneralizations or mother tongue transfers. These errors result from their limited foreign language knowledge.
Even if translation has a long tradition within the conveyance of foreign languages, there has been a vehement discussion on its role since the 1970s – at least with respect to some languages, such as English. In the context of German as a foreign language this topic has been discussed only to some extent. With this in mind, the following article aims to examine the role of translation in the field of the German as a foreign language with specific focus on the advantages and limitations associated with its conveyance and the resultant consequences.
Speakers of Russian from the former Soviet Union and speakers of Turkish form the two biggest groups of immigrants in Germany. There is a number of surveys, that focus on early second language acquisition of kindergarten and primary school children in these ethnic groups. In this article, I will discuss differences and similarities of the second language acquisition process, that Russian and Turkish speaking children go through. I will compare not only the interlingual development (pronunciation, lexicon, syntax and morphology) but also the sociocultural context. For this purpose the data of my case studies will be contrasted with the other research results.
Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird der Frage nachgegangen, ob Wortschatz mit einer Sprachlernapplikation effektiv erlernt werden kann. Den Ausgangspunkt bildet die Charakteristik der Wortschatzarbeit im traditionellen Fremdsprachenunterricht. Danach wird die Sprachapplikation "duolingo" vorgestellt. Es wird dabei analysiert, wie ihre Autor/innen bei der Vermittlung des Wortschatzes didaktischen Grundsätzen und lernpsychologischen Erkenntnissen folgen. Es werden sowohl Stärken als auch Unzulänglichkeiten gezeigt, die die Qualität des Vokabellernens
beeinflussen.
Der Artikel befasst sich mit der Fehleranalyse mit einem Schwerpunkt auf den Fehlern der tschechischen Schüler an Gymnasien in Schlesien. Der Begriff Fehler wird erklärt, und es wird versucht, eine neue Typologie der Fehler zu finden. Das Ergebnis der Fehleranalyse wird vorgestellt. Die Untersuchung setzt sich zum Ziel, zuerst die Fehler in schriftlichen Arbeiten zu klassifizieren und die häufigsten Fehlertypen zu finden. Der Beitrag erläutert, womit die Schüler die meisten Probleme haben.
Wenn man etwas lernt oder lernen will, geht es immer besser, wenn es Spaß macht. Dieser Beitrag möchte zeigen, dass eine witzige Situation oder Witze als Textsorte nicht nur als Motivation zum Lernen, sondern auch als ein fester Bestandteil des DaF-Unterrichts dienen können. Als ein Argument, das sich wie ein roter Faden durch diesen Text zieht und das diese Behauptung unterstützt, bietet sich die pragmatisch verankerte Perspektive an. Der Beitrag stellt sich vor diesem Hintergrund die Frage, ob die Witze beim Vermitteln der pragmatischen Kompetenz im Rahmen des DaF-Unterrichts behilflich sein können und ob diese daher von der Peripherie näher ins Zentrum des DaF-Unterrichts geraten sollten. Auch wenn die Argumentationslinie dieses Beitrags die Rolle der Witze im Unterricht unterstützen will, wird hier diese Richtung keinesfalls überschätzt. So wie die pragmatische Kompetenz sollte auch der Witz ein Teilchen des sprachdidaktischen Mosaiks darstellen, das nicht unbedingt in dessen Zentrum liegen muss.
The interest of this work devotes itself to the repeating linguistic actions of the students in the DaF conversation lessons. Repetitions in the lesson discourse are functionally different than repetitions in the daily discourse. The support of repetitions by the students in the class discourse is tried to be demonstrated here on the basis of examples. Recordings from the DaF conversation lessons were transcribed and reconstructed according to Hiat. The kinds of the repetitions and their functions in these DaF conversation lessons are limited with this study. The findings of the study should be concerned consciously in order to accomplish a better understanding and reacting to these repeating actions of the students like inquiry, correction, confirmation, precautionary self-control, verification and confirmation in the conversation lessons –most of which are accomplished by the students for a certain aim however unconsciously.
While both Japanese and English have a grammatic al form denoting the progressive, the two forms (te-iru & be+ing) interact differently with the inherent semantics of the verb to which they attach (Kindaichi, 1950; McClure, 1995; Shirai, 2000). Japanese change of state verbs are incompatible with a progressive interpretation, allowing only a resultative interpretation of V+ te-iru, while a progressive interpretation is preferred for activity predicates. English be+ing denotes a progressive interpretation regardless of the lexical semantics of the verb. The question that arises is how we can account for the fact that change of state verbs like dying can denote a progressive interpretation in English, but not in Japanese. While researchers such as Kageyama (1996) and Ogihara (1998, 1999) propose that the difference lies in the lexical semantics of the verbs themselves, others such as McClure (1995) have argued that the difference lies in the semantics of the grammatical forms, be+ing and te-iru. We present results from an experimental study of Japanese learners’ interpretation of the English progressive which provide support for McClure’s proposal. Results indicate that independent of verb type, learners had significantly more difficulty with the past progressive. We argue that knowledge of L2 semantics-syntax correspondences proceeds not on the basis of L1 lexical semantic knowledge, but on the basis of grammatical forms.
Integration and social advancement in our time without a solid language skills are no longer possible. What has not been done for decades, they now try through the integration abroad and in Germany make up very successful. But German is unfortunately only the first, though perhaps the most important step for a successful integration. The next question should now be: Lack of integration in spite of good knowledge of German - why?
The paper sketches out the framework of a transcultural model of language learning and teaching. In doing so it illuminates linguistic, psycholinguistic, hermeneutical und didactic aspects of the complex field of language learning rather than limiting itself to discussing mere methodological phenomena. The paper argues that the language learning and teaching profession can only advance by taking transcultural concepts of language acquisition, of linguistic systems, of language processing and of media use into account and by integrating them into a coherent system of language didactics.