Working Paper
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (3370) (remove)
Language
- English (2336)
- German (1014)
- Spanish (8)
- French (7)
- Multiple languages (2)
Keywords
- Deutschland (223)
- USA (64)
- Corporate Governance (53)
- Geldpolitik (53)
- Schätzung (52)
- Europäische Union (51)
- monetary policy (47)
- Bank (41)
- Sprachtypologie (34)
- Monetary Policy (29)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1483)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (1456)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (791)
- House of Finance (HoF) (655)
- Rechtswissenschaft (400)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (210)
- Informatik (119)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (75)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (75)
- Geographie (62)
Based on a unique data set of driving behavior we find direct evidence that private information has significant effects on contract choice and risk in automobile insurance. The number of car rides and the relative distance driven on weekends are significant risk factors. While the number of car rides and average speeding are negatively related to the level of liability coverage, the number of car rides and the relative distance driven at night are positively related to the level of first-party coverage. These results indicate multiple and counteracting effects of private information based on risk preferences and driving behavior.
Die Krisenproteste in Frankfurt am Main und insb. das Blockupy-Bündnis und dessen Praxen zwischen 2012 und 2015 stehen im Mittelpunkt der folgenden Auseinandersetzung. Insgesamt stellt Blockupy den wohl breitesten Versuch dar, in Deutschland Widerstand gegen das „europäische Krisenregime“ zu organisieren. Hierfür trat das Bündnis 2012 und 2013 mit Aktionen des zivilen Ungehorsams in Frankfurt, im Mai 2014 mit dezentralen Aktionen in ganz Europa sowie der Mobilisierung gegen die Eröffnungsfeier des Neubaus der EZB im Frankfurter Ostend 2015 in Erscheinung. In dichter Form werden die Ereignisse skizziert und abschließend bewertet. Zentralgestellt werden in der Auseinandersetzung mit Blockupy dessen Praxen des Widerspruchs, die Aktionsformen sowie die Prozesse der Bündnisbildung. Gefragt wird nach Blockupys Organisation, den vollzogenen Lernprozessen sowie den inhaltlichen und praxisbezogenen Verschiebungen. Herausgearbeitet wird, dass Blockupy zunächst stark auf die Kritik an „Banken und Konzernen“ abzielte, dann aber immer expliziter auf die EZB fokussierte und eine antikapitalistische Position entwickelte. Immer stärker wird auch die internationale Ausrichtung des Bündnisses, womit die Zielsetzung der Etablierung eines ‚Europas von unten‘ entgegen der ‚autoritären EU von oben‘ einherging.
Since the outbreak of the financial crisis, the macro-prudential policy paradigm has gained increasing prominence (Bank of England, 2009; Bernanke, 2011). The dynamics of this shift in the economic discourse, and the reasons this shift has not taken place prior to the crisis have not been addressed systemically. This paper investigates the evolution of the economic discourse on systemic risk and banking regulation to better understand these changes and their timing. Further, we use our sample to inquire whether, and if so, why the economic regulatory studies failed to recommend a reliable banking regulation prior to the crisis. By following a discourse analysis, we establish that the economic discourse on banking regulation has not been suitable for providing the knowledge basis required for a dynamically reliable banking regulation, and we identify the underlying reasons for such failure. These reasons include the obsession of economic discourse with optimization and particular forms of formalism, particularly, partial equilibrium analysis. Further, the economic discourse on banking regulation excludes historical and practitioners’ discourses and ignores weak signals. We point out that post-crisis, these epistemological failures of the economic discourse on banking regulation were not sufficiently recognized and that recent attempts to conceptualize systemic risk as a negative externality and to thus price it point to the persistence of formalism, equilibrium thinking and optimization, with their attending dangers.
The early acquisition of Greek compounds by two monolingual Greek girls aged between 1;8 and 3;0 years is studied in a usage-based theoretical framework. Special importance is attached to the morphological structure of Greek compound types occurring in child speech and child-directed speech. Greek nominal compound formation does not consist in the mere juxtaposition of words or roots, but involves stems as well as a compound marker. Major questions addressed are the transparency of compounds and productive nominal compound formation. Evidence for productivity of nominal compound formation has been found with only one of the two girls. In contrast to other languages, neoclassical nominal compounds by far exceed endocentric subordinative ones tokenwise in Greek child speech and child-directed speech providing evidence of entrenchment rather than productivity.
In a cross-linguistic comparison it is shown that, in spite of the fact that both Standard Modern Greek and German are rich in nominal compounds, their number is much more limited in Greek than in German child speech. An explanation for this apparent paradox is provided by an onomasiological approach to lexical typology based on a sample list of nominal compounds occurring in German child language and their Greek translational equivalents. It has been found that while use of nominal compounds is common in colloquial German including child-centered situations, it is more typical of Greek formal than colloquial registers.
Die "Digitalisierung" ist ein gesamtgesellschaftlicher und globaler Trend, der nahezu alle Bereiche der Lebens- und Arbeitswelt durchzieht und insofern auch das Studieren an (allen) Hochschulen betrifft. Das Schlagwort "Digitalisierung" verweist auch auf alle Varianten der Nutzung von digitalen Technologien im Bereich Studium und Lehre. Lange Zeit stand vor allem das E-Learning im Vordergrund der Diskussion und damit die Nutzung von digitalen Technologien im engeren Lehr-Lernkontext zur Unterstützung der Interaktion von Lehrenden und Studierenden. Heute werden an den Hochschulen zunehmend die weiteren Möglichkeiten der digitalen Technik für Studium und Lehre erkannt und immer mehr in der Praxis an Hochschulen genutzt: Von der Werbung um Studierende bis hin zur Ansprache von Alumni können sie die Qualität, die Leistungsfähigkeit, die Öffnung, Vermarktung und Internationalisierung der Hochschullehre unterstützen (Kerres 2013, Bischof und von Stuckrad 2013); und einige Hochschulen nutzen die Digitalisierung von Lehre und Studium zur Profilbildung und zur besseren Positionierung im nationalen und internationalen Wettbewerb zwischen Hochschulen. ...
„Corporate groups are a fact of life“.1 This was the starting point for a group of renowned European experts to deliver a report on a possible Directive on corporate group law in 2000.2 We all know that no such Directive has been issued.3 However, these days a fresh group of eminent experts has started, among other things, to develop an initiative „on groups of companies“.4 One reason for a European regulation to take its time might be the enormous national differences in dealing with group situations. While some countries, notably the UK,5 rely on general company law to deal with corporate groups, others provide most detailed rules specifically for groups of companies.6 German law provides an example for the latter. Do we need a law of corporate groups? Most countries regulate one or another aspect of group law.7
This is probably most common for tax and for accounting law. Insolvency law will often take group situations into account and the same is true for labour law. Regulatory oversight for financial institutions or insurance companies usually includes a group dimension. Competition law necessarily does so as well. However, in what follows when we speak about „group law“ we will focus on regulation more specifically tuned to genuine questions of company law such as the protection of minority shareholders or creditors, the standards for managerial behavior and the „enabling“ function of legal structures.
This paper investigates the potential implications of say on pay on management remuneration in Germany. We try to shed light on some key aspects by presenting quantitative data that allows us to gauge the pertinent effects of the German natural experiment that originates with the 2009 amendments to the Stock Corporation Act of 1965. In order to do this, we deploy a hand-collected data set for Germany's major firms (i.e. DAX 30), for the years 2006-2012. Rather than focusing exclusively on CEO remuneration we collected data for all members of the management board for the whole period under investigation. We observe that the compensation packages of management board members of Germany's DAX30-firms are quite closely linked to key performance measures. In addition, we find that salaries increase with the size of the company and that ownership concentration has no significant effect on compensation. Also, our findings suggest that the two-tier system seems to matter a lot when it comes to compensation. However, it would be misleading to state that we see no significant impact of the introduction of the German say on pay-regime. Our findings suggest that supervisory boards anticipate shareholder-behavior.
Transforming the current rather centralized electricity generating system into a climate neutral system based on renewable energy is an important approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and thus mitigate climate change. Stakeholders have each of them their own perception of the best strategies to achieve such a transformation. All perspectives are equally legitimate and needed for developing a specific transformation strategy suited for the region in focus....