TY - UNPD A1 - Kräussl, Roman A1 - Lucas, André A1 - Rijsbergen, David R. A1 - Sluis, Pieter Jelle van der A1 - Vrugt, Evert B. T1 - Washington meets Wall Street: a closer examination of the presidential cycle puzzle T2 - Center for Financial Studies (Frankfurt am Main): CFS working paper series ; No. 2010,06 N2 - We show that average excess returns during the last two years of the presidential cycle are significantly higher than during the first two years: 9.8 percent over the period 1948 – 2008. This pattern in returns cannot be explained by business-cycle variables capturing time-varying risk premia, differences in risk levels, or by consumer and investor sentiment. In this paper, we formally test the presidential election cycle (PEC) hypothesis as the alternative explanation found in the literature for explaining the presidential cycle anomaly. PEC states that incumbent parties and presidents have an incentive to manipulate the economy (via budget expansions and taxes) to remain in power. We formulate eight empirically testable propositions relating to the fiscal, monetary, tax, unexpected inflation and political implications of the PEC hypothesis. We do not find statistically significant evidence confirming the PEC hypothesis as a plausible explanation for the presidential cycle effect. The existence of the presidential cycle effect in U.S. financial markets thus remains a puzzle that cannot be easily explained by politicians employing their economic influence to remain in power. JEL Classification: E32; G14; P16 Keywords: Political Economy, Market Efficiency, Anomalies, Calendar Effects T3 - CFS working paper series - 2010, 06 KW - political economy KW - market efficiency KW - anomalies KW - calendar effects KW - USA KW - Kreditmarkt KW - Finanzwirtschaft KW - USA / President KW - Amtsperiode KW - Geschichte 1948-2008 Y1 - 2010 UR - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/7613 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-75795 IS - This version: January 2010 ER -