TY - JOUR A1 - Cavallaro, Marco A1 - D’Angelo, Tommaso A1 - Albrecht, Moritz Hans Ernst A1 - Yel, Ibrahim A1 - Martin, Simon S. A1 - Wichmann, Julian A1 - Lenga, Lukas Fabian A1 - Mazziotti, Silvio A1 - Blandino, Alfredo A1 - Ascenti, Giorgio A1 - Longo, Marcello A1 - Vogl, Thomas J. A1 - Booz, Christian T1 - Comprehensive comparison of dual-energy computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of bone marrow edema and fracture lines in acute vertebral fractures T2 - European radiology N2 - Objectives: To compare dual-energy CT (DECT) and MRI for assessing presence and extent of traumatic bone marrow edema (BME) and fracture line depiction in acute vertebral fractures. Methods: Eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent dual-source DECT and 3-T MRI of the spine were retrospectively analyzed. Five radiologists assessed all vertebrae for presence and extent of BME and for identification of acute fracture lines on MRI and, after 12 weeks, on DECT series. Additionally, image quality, image noise, and diagnostic confidence for overall diagnosis of acute vertebral fracture were assessed. Quantitative analysis of CT numbers was performed by a sixth radiologist. Two radiologists analyzed MRI and grayscale DECT series to define the reference standard. Results: For assessing BME presence and extent, DECT showed high sensitivity (89% and 84%, respectively) and specificity (98% in both), and similarly high diagnostic confidence compared to MRI (2.30 vs. 2.32; range 0–3) for the detection of BME (p = .72). For evaluating acute fracture lines, MRI achieved high specificity (95%), moderate sensitivity (76%), and a significantly lower diagnostic confidence compared to DECT (2.42 vs. 2.62, range 0–3) (p < .001). A cutoff value of − 0.43 HU provided a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 90% for diagnosing BME, with an overall AUC of 0.96. Conclusions: DECT and MRI provide high diagnostic confidence and image quality for assessing acute vertebral fractures. While DECT achieved high overall diagnostic accuracy in the analysis of BME presence and extent, MRI provided moderate sensitivity and lower confidence for evaluating fracture lines. KW - Radiology KW - Multidetector computed tomography KW - Magnetic resonance imaging KW - Spinal fractures KW - Retrospective study Y1 - 2021 UR - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/63588 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-635882 SN - 1432-1084 SN - 1613-3757 N1 - Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. VL - 32 IS - 1 SP - 561 EP - 571 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ; Heidelberg ER -