TY - JOUR A1 - Bang, Yung-Jue A1 - Yañez Ruiz, Eduardo A1 - Van Cutsem, Eric A1 - Lee, Wook-Lee A1 - Wyrwicz, Lucjan A1 - Schenker, Michael A1 - Alsina, Maria A1 - Ryu, Min-Hee A1 - Chung, Hyun-Choel A1 - Evesque, Ludovic A1 - Batran, Salah-Eddin al- A1 - Park, Se Hoon A1 - Lichinitser, Mikhail A1 - Boku, Narikazu A1 - Möhler, Markus A1 - Hong, Janet A1 - Xiong, Huiling A1 - Hallwachs, Roland A1 - Conti, Ilaria A1 - Taieb, Julien T1 - Phase III, randomised trial of avelumab versus physician's choice of chemotherapy as third-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 300 T2 - Annals of oncology N2 - Background: There currently are no internationally recognised treatment guidelines for patients with advanced gastric cancer/gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in whom two prior lines of therapy have failed. The randomised, phase III JAVELIN Gastric 300 trial compared avelumab versus physician’s choice of chemotherapy as third-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC. Patients and methods: Patients with unresectable, recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC were recruited at 147 sites globally. All patients were randomised to receive either avelumab 10 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks or physician’s choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 or irinotecan 150 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, each of a 4-week treatment cycle); patients ineligible for chemotherapy received best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: A total of 371 patients were randomised. The trial did not meet its primary end point of improving OS {median, 4.6 versus 5.0 months; hazard ratio (HR)=1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9–1.4]; P= 0.81} or the secondary end points of PFS [median, 1.4 versus 2.7 months; HR=1.73 (95% CI 1.4–2.2); P> 0.99] or ORR (2.2% versus 4.3%) in the avelumab versus chemotherapy arms, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 90 patients (48.9%) and 131 patients (74.0%) in the avelumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17 patients (9.2%) in the avelumab arm and in 56 patients (31.6%) in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with GC/GEJC with single-agent avelumab in the third-line setting did not result in an improvement in OS or PFS compared with chemotherapy. Avelumab showed a more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02625623. KW - PD-L1 KW - avelumab KW - chemotherapy KW - gastric cancer KW - gastro-oesophageal junction cancer KW - phase III Y1 - 2018 UR - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/53567 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-535672 SN - 1569-8041 SN - 0923-7534 N1 - This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com VL - 29 IS - 10 SP - 2052 EP - 2060 PB - Oxford Univ. Press CY - Oxford ER -