BMC Research Notes

© Michaelis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

10.1186/1756-0500-7-384

Short Report

Effects of flavonoid-induced oxidative stress on anti-H5N1 influenza a virus activity exerted by baicalein and biochanin A

Martin Michaelis1, 2  , Patchima Sithisarn1, 3   and Jindrich CinatlJr1  

(1)

Institute for Medical Virology, Clinics of the Goethe-University, Paul Ehrlich-Str. 40, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

(2)

Present address: Centre for Molecular Processing and School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK

(3)

Present address: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

Martin Michaelis (Corresponding author)

Email: M.Michaelis@kent.ac.uk

Patchima Sithisarn (Corresponding author)

Email: fvetphs@ku.ac.th

Jindrich CinatlJr (Corresponding author)

Email: cinatl@em.uni-frankfurt.de

Received: 24 April 2014Accepted: 13 June 2014Published online: 23 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Different flavonoids are known to interfere with influenza A virus replication. Recently, we showed that the structurally similar flavonoids baicalein and biochanin A inhibit highly pathogenic avian H5N1 influenza A virus replication by different mechanisms in A549 lung cells. Here, we investigated the effects of both compounds on H5N1-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and the role of ROS formation during H5N1 replication.

Findings

Baicalein and biochanin A enhanced H5N1-induced ROS formation in A549 cells and primary human monocyte-derived macrophages. Suppression of ROS formation induced by baicalein and biochanin A using the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine strongly increased the anti-H5N1 activity of both compounds in A549 cells but not in macrophages.

Conclusions

These findings emphasise that flavonoids induce complex pharmacological actions some of which may interfere with H5N1 replication while others may support H5N1 replication. A more detailed understanding of these actions and the underlying structure-activity relationships is needed to design agents with optimised anti-H5N1 activity.

Keywords

H5N1Biochanin ABaicaleinAntiviralReactive oxygen speciesN-acetyl-L-cysteine

Abbreviations

NAC

N-acetyl-L-cysteine

ROS

Reactive oxygen species.

Findings

Highly pathogenic influenza A viruses including H5N1 viruses represent a major pandemic threat. Complication rates are much higher in H5N1 patients than in seasonal influenza or pandemic H1N1/09 patients [1–4]. As of 24th January 2014, 650 confirmed human H5N1 cases had resulted in 386 deaths (http://​www.​who.​int).

During an initial pandemic phase, matched vaccines will be restricted and antiviral drugs will be critical. The efficacy of the approved anti-influenza drugs (adamantanes, neuraminidase inhibitors) is limited, resistant strains emerge, and H5N1 strains appear to be less sensitive to the established anti-influenza drugs than seasonal influenza strains [1, 4–13]. Hence, additional anti-influenza therapies are needed.

In 2009, the “WHO public health research agenda for Influenza” expressed a need for additional drugs including those that exert immunomodulatory effects and recommended to investigate natural products for anti-influenza activity (http://​www.​who.​int). Flavonoids are known to exert multiple pharmacological effects including anti-inflammatory and anti-viral activities including inhibition of seasonal influenza A (H1N1) viruses [14–19]. They may interfere with the influenza virus neuraminidase [19–21], the virus host cell uptake [20, 22], or cellular signalling events like the activation of nuclear factor kB (NFkB), AKT, ERK 1/2, p38, and/or JNK [23–27]. We showed recently that the flavonoids biochanin A and baicalein interfere with H5N1 replication in lung epithelial cells but that only baicalein inhibited H5N1 replication in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages [28]. Although biochanin A and baicalein are closely related structures (Figure 1A), they differed in their antiviral mechanisms. Inhibition of the H5N1 neuraminidase appeared to substantially contribute to the anti-H5N1 effects exerted by baicalein but not by biochanin A. Biochanin A interfered in contrast to baicalein with H5N1-induced activation of constituents of cellular signalling pathways [28] that are known to be involved in influenza virus replication such as AKT, ERK 1/2, and NFκB [10, 29–32]. Notably, the effects of baicalein and biochanin A on H5N1 replication are complex and additional antiviral mechanisms are likely to contribute to their anti-H5N1 activities.

Figure 1

Effects of baicalein and biochanin on reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in A549 cells infected with H5N1 strain A/Thailand/1(Kan-1)/04. A549 cells were treated continuously with the investigated flavonoids and/ or N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) starting with a 1 h pre-incubation period prior to infection with H5N1 strain A/Thailand/1(Kan-1)/04 (MOI 0.01). ROS formation was detected at 24 h post infection. A) Chemical structures of biochanin A and baicalein; B) Effects of different baicalein or biochanin A concentrations on H5N1-induced ROS formation. *P < 0.05 relative to virus control; C) Effects of N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) 5 mM on baicalein 40 μM- or biochanin A 40 μM-induced ROS formation in H5N1-infected A549 cells. ‘-’ indicates absence of virus or respective compound, ‘+’ indicates presence of virus or respective compound. *P < 0.05 relative to virus control, #P < 0.05 relative to respective flavonoid alone. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. from three different independent experiments.

Flavonoids are known to differ in their effects on the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). They may display anti- or pro-oxidative effects [33]. Influenza virus replication is influenced by the cellular redox status [34]. The inhibition of virus-induced ROS formation by different strategies including the use of the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) was shown to inhibit influenza A virus replication including H5N1 strains [34–36]. Here, we investigated the effects of baicalein and biochanin A on H5N1-induced ROS formation and the combined effects of baicalein and biochanin A in combination with the antioxidant NAC on H5N1 replication.

A549 cells (human lung carcinoma; ATCC, Manassass, VA, USA: CCL-185) and Vero cells (African green monkey kidney; ATCC: CCL81) were cultivated as described previously [28]. Human monocytes were isolated from buffy coats of healthy donors (Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immune Haematology, German Red Cross Blood Donor Centre, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany) and CD14⁺ monocytes were differentiated into MDMs as described previously [28]. Cells were infected with H5N1 strain A/Thailand/1(Kan-1)/04 (obtained from Dr. Puthavathana, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand) and virus titres were determined as 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID₅₀/mL) as described previously [28]. Flavonoids, NAC, or their combinations were present starting from a 1 h pre-incubation period prior to infection. For the identification of statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), two groups were compared by Student’s t-test, more groups by ANOVA followed by subsequent stepwise multiple comparison procedure using the Student-Newman-Keuls method.

H5N1 infection of A549 cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) 0.01 resulted in enhanced ROS formation compared to control 24 h after infection (Figure 1B) as indicated by the use of the Image-iT LIVE Green Reactive Oxygen Species Kit (Molecular Probes, distributed by Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Baicalein and biochanin A (both obtained from Indofine Chemical Company, Hillsborough, NJ, USA) did not influence ROS levels in non-infected or H5N1-infected cells in concentrations up to 20 μM. However, at a concentration of 40 μM both compounds increased the ROS levels in non-infected as well as H5N1-infected cells (Figure 1B) despite the differences in their modes of anti-H5N1 action [28]. An NAC (obtained from Alexis, distributed by Axxora, Germany, dissolved in unsupplemented MEM and adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH) concentration of 5 mM was sufficient to reduce the ROS levels below the levels observed in non-treated H5N1-infected A549 cells (Figure 1C).Next, we investigated whether the reduction of baicalein- or biochanin A-induced enhanced ROS levels in H5N1-infected A549 cells by NAC influences the antiviral effects of these flavonoids. H5N1 (MOI 0.01)-infected A549 cells were treated with baicalein 40 μM or biochanin A 40 μM in combination with NAC in concentrations ranging from 1.25 to 5 mM. NAC did not affect cell viability alone or in combination with baicalein or biochanin A in the investigated concentrations as indicated by the CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) (data not shown). While NAC 5 mM alone moderately reduced H5N1 titres (2.2-fold reduction), NAC 2.5 mM or 1.25 mM did not significantly affect virus titres (Figure 2A). However, NAC reduced H5N1 titres in combination with baicalein or biochanin A in a dose-dependent manner in this concentration range in A549 cells (Figure 2B). Notably, NAC also inhibited baicalein- and biochanin A-induced oxidative stress in H5N1-infected primary human monocyte-derived macrophages but did not affect H5N1 replication in this cell type (Figure 3). Human monocytes had been isolated from buffy coats of healthy donors, obtained from the Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immune Haematology, German Red Cross Blood Donor Center, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main.

Figure 2

Effects of baicalein and biochanin A on H5N1 titres in combination with N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). A549 cells were infected with H5N1 strain A/Thailand/1(Kan-1)/04 (MOI 0.01). Drugs were continuously present starting with a 1 h pre-incubation period. Virus titres were determined 48 h post infection. A) Effects of NAC on H5N1 replication, *P < 0.05 relative to virus control; B) Effects of NAC on H5N1 titres in the presence of the flavonoids baicalein 40 μM or biochanin A 40 μM, *P < 0.05 relative to flavonoid alone. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. from three different independent experiments.

Figure 3

Effects of baicalein and biochanin A on reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and H5N1 replication in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages in combination with N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). Macrophages were infected with H5N1 strain A/Thailand/1(Kan-1)/04 (MOI 1). Drugs were continuously present starting with a 1 h pre-incubation period. Virus titres were determined 48 h post infection. A) Effects of flavonoids 40 μM and/or NAC 5 mM on H5N1-induced ROS formation, ‘-’ indicates absence of virus or respective compound, ‘+’ indicates presence of virus or respective compound. *P < 0.05 relative to flavonoids alone; B) Effects of baicalein 40 μM or biochanin A 40 μM in the presence or absence of NAC 5 mM on H5N1 titres. ‘-’ indicates absence of virus or respective compound, ‘+’ indicates presence of virus or respective compound. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. from three different independent experiments.

In conclusion, we show that two flavonoids that interfere with H5N1 replication by different mechanisms of action exert similar effects at the level of ROS induction. Baicalein interferes with the H5N1 neuraminidase activity but biochanin does not. Biochanin A (but not baicalein) inhibits the activation of signalling molecules involved in H5N1-induced signalling including AKT, ERK 1/2, and NFκB [28]. Despite these differences in their anti-H5N1 mechanisms, both compounds enhanced H5N1-induced ROS formation in A549 cells, and the efficacy of both compounds was enhanced by the antioxidant NAC. In contrast, inhibition of flavonoid-induced ROS formation by NAC did not affect virus replication in H5N1-infected macrophages. These findings emphasise that flavonoids, a class of natural compounds known to exert anti-influenza effects [16–19, 28], induce a complex range of pharmacological actions by which they modify influenza A virus replication including highly pathogenic avian H5N1 strains. These actions may be cell type-specific and include pro- and antiviral effects. The overall activity may be the result of the totality of effects exerted by a certain flavonoid in a certain cell type. A more detailed understanding of these actions and the underlying structure-activity relationships is needed in order to design structures with optimised anti-influenza activity.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. Christina Matreux, Mrs. Kerstin Euler, Mrs. Gesa Meincke, and Mrs. Rosy Schmidt for technical supports. This work was supported by the EU (SARS/FLU vaccine/ proposal no. 512054, Chimeric Vaccines/ proposal no. 512864, Intranasal H5 vaccine, proposal no. 044512), by the Hilfe für krebskranke Kinder Frankfurt e.V., and by the Frankfurter Stiftung für krebskranke Kinder. P. Sithisarn was supported by a FRA scholarship from the Royal Thai Government.

References

1.

Cheung CL, Rayner JM, Smith GJ, Wang P, Naipospos TS, Zhang J, Yuen KY, Webster RG, Peiris JS, Guan Y, Chen H: Distribution of amantadine-resistant H5N1 avian influenza variants in Asia. J Infect Dis 2006, 193:1626–1629. 10.1086/50472316703504CrossRefPubMed

2.

de Jong MD: H5N1 transmission and disease: observations from the frontlines. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008, 27:S54-S56. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181684d2d18820578CrossRefPubMed

3.

Hien ND, Ha NH, Van NT, Ha NT, Lien TT, Thai NQ, Trang VD, Shimbo T, Takahashi Y, Kato Y, Kawana A, Akita S, Kudo K: Human infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) in northern Vietnam, 2004–2005. Emerg Infect Dis 2009, 15:19–23. 10.3201/eid1501.080073266068419116044CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

4.

McKimm-Breschkin JL, Selleck PW, Usman TB, Johnson MA: Reduced sensitivity of influenza A (H5N1) to oseltamivir. Emerg Infect Dis 2007, 13:1354–1357. 10.3201/eid1309.070164285728618252107CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

5.

Deyde VM, Xu X, Bright RA, Shaw M, Smith CB, Zhang Y, Shu Y, Gubareva LV, Cox NJ, Klimov AI: Surveillance of resistance to adamantanes among influenza A(H3N2) and A(H1N1) viruses isolated worldwide. J Infect Dis 2007, 196:249–257. 10.1086/51893617570112CrossRefPubMed

6.

Hampson AW: Vaccines for pandemic influenza. The history of our current vaccines, their limitations and the requirements to deal with a pandemic threat. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008, 37:510–517. 18618064CrossRefPubMed

7.

Kieny MP, Fukuda K: The pandemic influenza vaccine challenge. Vaccine 2008,26(Suppl 4):D3-D4. 19230152CrossRefPubMed

8.

Sugrue RJ, Tan BH, Yeo DS, Sutejo R: Antiviral drugs for the control of pandemic influenza virus. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008, 37:518–524. 18618065CrossRefPubMed

9.

van der Vries E, van den Berg B, Schutten M: Fatal oseltamivir-resistant influenza virus infection. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1074–1076. 10.1056/NEJMc0803120CrossRefPubMed

10.

Michaelis M, Doerr HW, Cinatl J Jr: Of chickens and men: avian influenza in humans. Curr Mol Med 2009, 9:131–151. 10.2174/15665240978758156519275623CrossRefPubMed

11.

Moscona A: Global transmission of oseltamivir-resistant influenza. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:953–956. 10.1056/NEJMp090064819258250CrossRefPubMed

12.

Bavagnoli L, Maga G: The 2009 influenza pandemic: promising lessons for antiviral therapy for future outbreaks. Curr Med Chem 2011, 18:5466–5475. 10.2174/09298671179819439722087838CrossRefPubMed

13.

Salter A, Ni LB, Crowley B: Emergence and phylogenetic analysis of amantadine-resistant influenza a subtype H3N2 viruses in Dublin, Ireland, over Six Seasons from 2003/2004 to 2008/2009. Intervirology 2011, 54:305–315. 10.1159/00032135821228542CrossRefPubMed

14.

Harborne JB, Williams CA: Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochemistry 2000, 55:481–504. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00235-111130659CrossRefPubMed

15.

Nijveldt RJ, van Nood E, van Hoorn DE, Boelens PG, van Norren K, van Leeuwen PA: Flavonoids: a review of probable mechanisms of action and potential applications. Am J Clin Nutr 2001, 74:418–425. 11566638CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kim Y, Narayanan S, Chang KO: Inhibition of influenza virus replication by plant-derived isoquercetin. Antiviral Res 2010, 88:227–235. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.08.01620826184CrossRefPubMed

17.

Xu G, Dou J, Zhang L, Guo Q, Zhou C: Inhibitory effects of baicalein on the influenza virus in vivo is determined by baicalin in the serum. Biol Pharm Bull 2010, 33:238–243. 10.1248/bpb.33.23820118546CrossRefPubMed

18.

Chen L, Dou J, Su Z, Zhou H, Wang H, Zhou W, Guo Q, Zhou C: Synergistic activity of baicalein with ribavirin against influenza A (H1N1) virus infections in cell culture and in mice. Antiviral Res 2011, 91:314–320. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.07.00821782851CrossRefPubMed

19.

Grienke U, Schmidtke M, von Grafenstein S, Kirchmair J, Liedl KR, Rollinger JM: Influenza neuraminidase: a druggable target for natural products. Nat Prod Rep 2012, 29:11–36. 10.1039/c1np00053e22025274CrossRefPubMed

20.

Wang X, Jia W, Zhao A, Wang X: Anti-influenza agents from plants and traditional Chinese medicine. Phytother Res 2006, 20:335–341. 10.1002/ptr.189216619359CrossRefPubMed

21.

Liu AL, Wang HD, Lee SM, Wang YT, Du GH: Structure-activity relationship of flavonoids as influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors and their in vitro anti-viral activities. Bioorg Med Chem 2008, 16:7141–7147. 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.04918640042CrossRefPubMed

22.

Song JM, Park KD, Lee KH, Byun YH, Park JH, Kim SH, Kim JH, Seong BL: Biological evaluation of anti-influenza viral activity of semi-synthetic catechin derivatives. Antiviral Res 2007, 76:178–185. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.07.00117709148CrossRefPubMed

23.

Biswas SK, McClure D, Jimenez LA, Megson IL, Rahman I: Curcumin induces glutathione biosynthesis and inhibits NF-kappaB activation and interleukin-8 release in alveolar epithelial cells: mechanism of free radical scavenging activity. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005, 7:32–41. 10.1089/ars.2005.7.3215650394CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hecht SS, Huang C, Stoner GD, Li J, Kenney PM, Sturla SJ, Carmella SG: Identification of cyanidin glycosides as constituents of freeze-dried black raspberries which inhibit anti-benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide induced NFkappaB and AP-1 activity. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27:1617–1626. 301734416522666CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

25.

Sen P, Chakraborty PK, Raha S: Tea polyphenol epigallocatechin 3-gallate impedes the anti-apoptotic effects of low-grade repetitive stress through inhibition of Akt and NFkappaB survival pathways. FEBS Lett 2006, 580:278–284. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.01316376342CrossRefPubMed

26.

Cavet ME, Harrington KL, Vollmer TR, Ward KW, Zhang JZ: Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of the green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin gallate in human corneal epithelial cells. Mol Vis 2011, 17:533–542. 304469621364905CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

27.

Kole L, Giri B, Manna SK, Pal B, Ghosh S: Biochanin-A, an isoflavon, showed anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory activities through the inhibition of iNOS expression, p38-MAPK and ATF-2 phosphorylation and blocking NFkappaB nuclear translocation. Eur J Pharmacol 2011, 653:8–15. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.11.02621147093CrossRefPubMed

28.

Sithisarn P, Michaelis M, Schubert-Zsilavecz M, Cinatl J Jr: Differential antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of the flavonoids biochanin A and baicalein in H5N1 influenza A virus-infected cells. Antiviral Res 2013, 97:41–48. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.10.00423098745CrossRefPubMed

29.

Shin YK, Liu Q, Tikoo SK, Babiuk LA, Zhou Y: Effect of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway on influenza A virus propagation. J Gen Virol 2007, 88:942–950. 10.1099/vir.0.82483-017325368CrossRefPubMed

30.

Geiler J, Michaelis M, Sithisarn P, Cinatl J Jr: Comparison of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and cellular signal transduction in human macrophages infected with different influenza A viruses. Med Microbiol Immunol 2011, 200:53–60. 10.1007/s00430-010-0173-y20865277CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ludwig S: Disruption of virus-host cell interactions and cell signaling pathways as an anti-viral approach against influenza virus infections. Biol Chem 2011, 392:837–847. 21823902CrossRefPubMed

32.

Pinto R, Herold S, Cakarova L, Hoegner K, Lohmeyer J, Planz O, Pleschka S: Inhibition of influenza virus-induced NF-kappaB and Raf/MEK/ERK activation can reduce both virus titers and cytokine expression simultaneously in vitro and in vivo. Antiviral Res 2011, 92:45–56. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.05.00921641936CrossRefPubMed

33.

Khan HY, Zubair H, Ullah MF, Ahmad A, Hadi SM: A prooxidant mechanism for the anticancer and chemopreventive properties of plant polyphenols. Curr Drug Targets 2012, 13:1738–1749. 10.2174/13894501280454556023140285CrossRefPubMed

34.

Vlahos R, Stambas J, Selemidis S: Suppressing production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) for influenza A virus therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2012, 33:3–8. 10.1016/j.tips.2011.09.00121962460CrossRefPubMed

35.

Geiler J, Michaelis M, Naczk P, Leutz A, Langer K, Doerr HW, Cinatl J Jr: N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) inhibits virus replication and expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in A549 cells infected with highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus. Biochem Pharmacol 2010, 79:413–420. 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.08.02519732754CrossRefPubMed

36.

Michaelis M, Geiler J, Naczk P, Sithisarn P, Leutz A, Doerr HW, Cinatl J Jr: Glycyrrhizin exerts antioxidative effects in H5N1 influenza A virus-infected cells and inhibits virus replication and pro-inflammatory gene expression. PLoS One 2011, 6:e19705. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019705309662921611183CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MM and JC designed the study, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. PS performed experiments and analysed data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.