PLoS ONE

PLoS One. 13(7): e0201169

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia colonization during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with impaired survival

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6408-3536Sebastian Scheich, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing¹²*, Rosalie Koenig, Data curation¹, Anne C. Wilke, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft¹², Sarah Lindner, Investigation, Writing – review & editing¹², Claudia Reinheimer, Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing²³, Thomas A. Wichelhaus, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing²³, Michael Hogardt, Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing²³, Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing²³, Johanna Kessel, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing²⁴, Sarah Weber, Investigation, Writing – review & editing¹², Hans Martin, Data curation, Writing – review & editing¹², Gesine Bug, Data curation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing¹², Hubert Serve, Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing¹², Björn Steffen, Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing¹²

Senthilnathan Palaniyandi, Editor

1. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

2. University Center for Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

3. Institute of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

4. Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

University of Kentucky, UNITED STATES

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: sebastian.scheich@kgu.de

© 2018 Scheich et al

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201169

Published online: 19 July 2018

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers potential cure to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, infections with commensal bacteria are an important cause for non-relapse mortality (NRM). We have previously described the impact of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization on the survival of allo-HSCT patients. In the aforementioned publication, according to consensus, we there did not consider the opportunistic gram-negative bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) to be an MDRO. Since rate of S. maltophilia colonization is increasing, and it is not known whether this poses a risk for allo-HSCT patients, we here analyzed here its effect on the previously described and now extended patient cohort. We report on 291 AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Twenty of 291 patients (6.9%) were colonized with S. maltophilia. Colonized patients did not differ from non-colonized patients with respect to their age, remission status before allo-HSCT, donor type and HSCT-comorbidity index. S. maltophilia colonized patients had a worse overall survival (OS) from 6 months up to 60 months (85% vs. 88.1% and 24.7% vs. 59.7%; p = 0.007) due to a higher NRM after allo-HSCT (6 months: 15% vs. 4.8% and 60 months: 40.1% vs. 16.2% p = 0.003). The main cause of mortality in colonized patients was infection (46.2% of all deaths) and in non-colonized patients relapse (58.8% of all deaths). 5/20 colonized patients developed an invasive infection with S. maltophilia. The worse OS after allo-HSCT due to higher infection related mortality might implicate the screening of allo-HSCT patients for S. maltophilia and a closer observation of colonized patients as outpatients.

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a life-saving option for patients with advanced hematologic diseases like relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Often, it remains the only curative option. Over the last decade, improved transplant regimens lead to greatly reduced transplant-related morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the number of performed allo-HSCT continues to rise [1]. Graft-versus-Host disease (GvHD) and relapse of the underlying disease are considered the main causes of mortality during and after transplantation. However, the severe immunosuppression that accompanies allo-HSCT and GvHD prophylaxis and treatment puts patients at serious risk to suffer and die from infectious complications [2–7]. Aside from fungal and viral infections, bacterial infections, often with commensal bacteria, pose a considerable threat to these patients. A particularly menacing group of bacteria are gram-negative bacilli exhibiting a broad spectrum resistance to commonly used antibiotics like multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative pathogens [8,9]. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is a widely spread gram negative opportunistic bacterial pathogen with increasing prevalence [9,8,10]. Due to low virulence it does not fit in the common definitions of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO)[11]. However, it has an intrinsic resistance against e.g. carbapenems [8,9]. Although its virulence is comparably low, S. maltophilia may cause severe infections especially in immunocompromised patients and patients on intensive-care units [9,8,10]. Once an infection occurs, treatment might be limited due to resistance to ß-lactam-antibiotics and increasing resistance rates to fluoroquinolones and cotrimoxazole [10,12–17]. Furthermore, underlying hematological diseases were shown to be an independent risk factor associated with a higher mortality of S. maltophilia infections [18].

This prompted us to revisit a previously analyzed and now extended patient cohort, in which we had analyzed the role of colonization with MDRO (but not S. maltophilia) after allo-HSCT [19]. Here, we have investigated the impact of S. maltophilia colonization on the outcome of AML patients post allo-HSCT. We hypothesize that colonization leads to clinically relevant infection throughout the course of immunosuppression impairing the survival of these patients.

Materials, study design and definitions

We revisited the medical records of 264 patients with a diagnosis of AML, who underwent a first allo-HSCT at our institution between January 2006 and March 2016 and extended the cohort to December 2016 up to overall 291 patients. At our institution, all patients are routinely screened for colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (namely Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, gram-negative rods expressing extended-spectrum β-lactamase), and for S. maltophilia at the day of admittance and weekly thereafter by rectal, pharyngeal and nasal swabs.

Species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed as previously described [20]. All laboratory procedures were performed under quality–controlled criteria (laboratory accreditation according to ISO 15189:2007 standards; certificate number D–ML–13102–01–00, valid through January 25th, 2021). For S. maltophilia detection, swabs were collected using culture swabs with Amies collection and transport medium (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) and streaked onto selective gram-negative agar plates. Species were identified by biochemical identification systems or matrix-assisted–laser desorption ionization–time of flight analysis (API identification systems, VITEK MS, MALDI-TOF; bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany). Antibiotic susceptibility was tested according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines using VITEK 2 and/or antibiotic gradient tests (bioMérieux) as well as agar diffusion method.

Colonization with S. maltophilia was defined as detection of the organism in at least one screening swab performed at the day of admittance and weekly thereafter during the hospital stay for allo-HSCT. Infection with S. maltophilia was defined as detection of the organism in blood culture bottles (BD BACTEC Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F, Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) or primarily sterile body compartments together with clinical signs of infection.

For allo-HSCT, patients were individually housed in air-filtered rooms (HEPA-Filter) and transplants were performed according to local standard procedures with routinely inserted central venous catheters. According to our anti-infective guidelines, all patients received from the beginning of neutropenia until engraftment an antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotaxime and an anti-fungal prophylaxis containing an echinocandin or broad-spectrum azole. Additionally, all patients received cotrimoxazole three times a week for Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis and acyclovir as long as CD4+ T-cells were <400/nl even during severe neutropenia. In case of fever, blood cultures were collected and bottles were sent for microbiological testing to the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control of University Hospital Frankfurt. Bloodstream infection was defined as detection of any bacterial species from blood cultures. For coagulase negative staphylococci two consecutive positive cultures were required to define an infection. According to Bacigalupo et al., conditioning regimens were classified as myeloablative (MAC)[21] or reduced intensity [22]. GvHD was assessed using modified Glucksberg criteria [23] (acute GvHD, aGvHD) or National Institute of Health criteria [24] (chronic GvHD, cGvHD), respectively. Mucositis was defined and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) [25]. Cytogenetic risk classification was done according to the guidelines of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN)[21]. Hematopoietic stem cell comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was used to assess pre-existing conditions [26]. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and non-relapse related mortality (NRM), secondary endpoints were rate of neutropenic fever, infections with S. maltophilia, admission to intensive care unit and relapse of disease (>5% bone marrow blasts). Patients gave written informed consent for the use of their medical records and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany (Approval number SHN-02-2017).

Statistics

SPSS (Version 24.0; IBM, SPSS Institute Inc., Chicago, USA) and R (Version 3.2.2, packages “cmprsk” and “survival”) were used for statistical analysis. Comparisons of continuous variables were performed via by Mann-Whitney-U test and categorical variables via Fisher’s exact test and chi-square test, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared by log-rank test. For competing risks, cumulative incidences were calculated and compared using Gray’s test. For multivariate analysis, the Cox regression model was used with at least 10 events per variable according to Peduzzi et al. to include the variable into analysis [27].

Results

Baseline patient characteristics and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia findings

Between January 2006 and December 2016, 291 patients underwent a first allo-HSCT at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany and were included into the study. Table 1 shows baseline patient characteristics.

See full tableTable 1. Baseline patient characteristics.P-values reveals differences between colonized and non-colonized patients. Allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ELN, European Leukemia Net; CR, complete remission; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; MRD, matched related donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GvHD, Graft versus Host Disease, HCT-CI, hemtaopoetic stem cell transplantation comorbidity index.

The median age of the study population was 54 years (range 19–74) being slightly predominated by male patients (173/291, 59.5%). Most patients were transplanted in first remission (137/291, 47.1%), 35 (12%) in second or later remission and 119/291 (40.9%) with active disease. 67% of patients had de novo AML with 13.7% favorable, 63.9% intermediate I/II and 22.3% adverse ELN cytogenetic risk score. 133/291 patients (45.7%) received MAC conditioning and 88.7% were peripheral blood grafts. 26.1% were transplanted from a matched related donor, 47.1% from a matched unrelated donor, 21% from a mismatched unrelated donor and 5.8% from a haploidentical donor. 217/291 patients received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as GvHD prophylaxis. A high risk CMV constellation (recipient positive, donor negative) was found in 15.8% of patients, 54% were transplanted with an AB0 mismatch. The median time from diagnosis or relapse to transplantation was 3.07 months (range 0.27–38.27). Regarding pre-existing conditions, 23.7% had a low risk, 32% an intermediate risk and 44.3% a high risk HCT-CI.

In our study, 20/291 patients (6.9%) were colonized by S. maltophilia. Most of these colonized patients were colonized orally (16/20, 80%), two patients each (10%) had rectal colonization and nasal colonization, respectively. Concerning positive status for S. maltophilia, 18/20 patients (90%) were initially tested positive during their stay for allo-HSCT, 2/20 patients (10%) were reported to be positive before admission. The median time between admission to allo-HSCT and the first positive swab was 19.5 days (range 0–87 days). Resistance to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin) was found in 2/20 (10%), resistance to cotrimoxazole in 3/20 (15%) S. maltophilia colonized patients and a resistance against ceftazidime in 11/20 patients (55%). The median year of transplantation tends to be earlier for colonized patients compared to non-colonized patients (2009 vs. 2012, p = 0.050). Other baseline patient characteristics did not differ between colonized and non-colonized patients.

Transplant-characteristics, events and outcomes

An overview of transplant-characteristics and outcomes is given in Table 2.

See full tableTable 2. Transplant-related characteristics and outcomes.P-values reveal differences between colonized and non-colonized patients. ANC, absolute neutrophil count; PLT, platelets; aGvHD, acute Graft versus Host Disease; cGvHD, chronic Graft versus Host Disease MDRO, multidrug resistant organisms; BIS, bloodstream infection; allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. OS, Overall survival, 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NRM, non-relapse mortality; GvHD, Graft versus Host Disease.

The median length of the hospital stay for allo-HSCT was 42 days (range 7–180) with a median neutrophil engraftment time (>0.5×10⁹/l) of 18 days (range 9–36) and a median platelet engraftment time (>50×10⁹/l) of 19 days (range 9–1575). Neutrophil engraftment time tends to be shorter in colonized patients (16 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.077). Neutropenic fever occurred in 84.2% of patients and 16.8% were tested positive for Clostridium difficile. 124/291 patients (42.6%) suffered from a mucositis CTCAE grade 3/4 and in 88/291 (30.2%) a blood stream infection (BSI) was detected. CMV-reactivation was observed in 55.7% of all patients (with donor and/or recipient CMV-positive; n = 201), other viral infections in 28.9% of all patients during allo-HSCT. In case of fever during allo-HSCT, carbapenems were the most commonly used antibiotics (65.3%), followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (31.3%). 30.2% of all patients received fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin). Colistin was administered in 4.8%, amikacin in 12%, vancomycin in 35.7%, linezolid in 24.7%, teicoplanin in 16.2% and tigecyclin in 1% of all patients. 18 patients had to be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) during their stay for allo-HSCT. Patients colonized with S. maltophilia had a significantly longer inpatient stay for allo-HSCT (52.5 days vs. 41 days, p = 0.011) and were more often admitted to ICU (5/20 patients, 25% vs. 13/271 patients, 4.8%, p = 0.004). 80% (4/5 patients) of the colonized patients were admitted to ICU because of respiratory insufficiency and 7/13 (54.8%) patients from the non-colonized group were admitted to the ICU due to respiratory insufficiency. Six patients suffered from an infection by S. maltophilia (two pulmonary infections, one each with wound infection, urinary tract infection, BSI and combined pulmonary and BSI, respectively). More colonized patients suffered from a S. maltophilia infection than patients tested negative for S. maltophilia (25% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001). Interestingly, one patient without prior colonization primarily presented with an urinary tract infection by a S. maltophilia infection.

The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (aGvHD) was 50.5% (95% CI 44.7, 56.3) with a grade 3 or 4 GvHD incidence of 10.2% (95% CI 6.7, 13.7). The cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 47.9% (95% CI 41.7, 54.1) and the severe cGvHD rate was 12.1% (95% CI 8.1, 16.1). Cumulative incidences of aGvHD, grade 3 or 4 aGvHD, cGvHD and severe cGvHD did not differ between non-colonized patients and patients tested positive for S. maltophilia.

The estimated 5-year OS of all patients was 57% with a mean OS time of 84.6 months (95% CI 76.5, 92.7; Fig 1A). Colonized patients revealed a lower OS after allo-HSCT compared to non-colonized patients (p = 0.007): OS was 88.1% (95% CI, 84.2, 92) in non-colonized and 85% (95% CI 69.3, 100) in colonized patients at 6 months, 81.6% (95% CI 76.9, 86.3) in non-colonized and 69.1% (95% CI 48.5, 89.7) in colonized patients at 12 months, 62.1% (95% CI 55.6, 68.6) in non-colonized and 33% (95% CI 8.5, 57.5) in colonized patients at 48 months and 59.7% (95% CI 53, 66.4) in non-colonized and 24.7% (95% CI 1.6, 47.8) in colonized patients after 60 months (Fig 1B).

Fig 1View larger versionFig 1. Overall survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.(A) Overall survival of all patients. (B) Overall survival stratified by colonization (dotted line) with S. maltophilia.

Lower OS in the colonized group was mainly attributable to a higher cumulative incidence of NRM. NRM rose from 4.8% (95% CI 2.2, 7.4) in non-colonized patients and 15% (95% CI 0, 31.1) in colonized patients at 6 months up to a 5-year cumulative incidence of NRM of 16.2% (95% CI 11.1, 21.3) in non-colonized and 40.1% (95% CI 14.4, 65.8) in colonized patients (p = 0.003; Fig 2A). The cumulative incidence of relapse (5 years) did not differ significantly between both groups (34.2% in non-colonized vs. 37.9% in colonized patients, p = 0.927; Fig 2B).

Fig 2View larger versionFig 2. Cumulative incidence of non-relapse related mortality (A) and cumulative incidence of relapse (B) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, stratified by colonized (dotted line) and non-colonized (solid line) patients.

Regarding the causes of death, infection was the main cause in colonized patients (46.2% of all deaths), while in non-colonized patients, relapse of AML was the most frequent cause of fatal outcome (56.4% of all deaths, p = 0.021). All deaths in colonized patients were attributable to lung infections. Infection related deaths of colonized patients are described in detail in the supplementary Table 1 (S1 Table). 2.8% of all patients (8/291) died in neutropenia immediately after allo-HSCT, 6 (2.2%) from the non-colonized and 2 (10%) from colonized group (p = 0.098).

Multivariate analysis of OS (Table 3) revealed that colonization with S. maltophilia (hazard ratio (HR) 1.982, 95% CI 1.091–3.597; p = 0.025) and adverse ELN-cytogenetics vs. favorable cytogenetics (HR 2.319, 95% CI 1.138–4.726; p = 0.021) were independent risk factors for fatal outcome, whereas year of transplantation ≥2012, ELN-cytogenetics, which were both differing in univariate analysis, and age >60 were not.

See full tableTable 3. Multivariate analysis for overall survival.95% CI, 95% confidence interval; allo-HSCT, allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ELN, European Leukemia Net. Of all S.maltophilia colonized patients (n = 20), 15 (75%) were also colonized by an MDRO as described previously[19].

In an exploratory multivariate analysis for OS including only colonization with MDRO and S. maltophilia, S. maltophilia was identified as an independent risk factor for death (MDRO colonization: HR 1.734, 95% CI 1.159–2.595, p = 0.007; S. maltophilia colonization: HR 1.879, 95% CI 1.045–3.381, p = 0.035). In comparison to non-colonized patients (neither colonized with S. maltophilia nor with MDRO), patients colonized with S. maltophilia had an inferior OS (S1 Fig) compared to non-colonized patients (5-year OS: 24.7% vs. 66.3%; p = 0.001) and compared to MDRO-colonized patients (5-year OS: 24.7% vs. 53.3%; p = 0.065).

Discussion

Patients with AML undergoing allo-HSCT are at a particular high risk of developing infections with S. maltophilia due to chemotherapy, disease related immunosuppression, severe neutropenia and inserted central venous catheters [28–30]. Therefore, we have reviewed clinical records of 291 AML patients, who underwent a first allo-HSCT at our institution to clarify the role of colonization with S. maltophilia on outcome parameters and have identified 20 (6.9%) patients who were colonized swab by S. maltophilia in at least one.

In the original, not extended cohort (264 patients) we have recently shown that MDRO-positive patients had an inferior OS probability compared to non-colonized patients at 5 years primarily due to a higher cumulative incidence of NRM after allo-HSCT[19]. In this study, of 20 patients colonized by S. maltophilia, 15 were additionally colonized by a MDRO which may confound our results. However, the explorative multivariate analysis for OS including only MDRO-colonization and S. maltophilia colonization revealed that S. maltophilia colonization is an independent risk factor for fatal outcome.

The colonization rate of 6.9% (20 patients) is comparable to other studies: Shiratori et al. reported from a colonization rate of 6.4% (14/220 patients)[31]. In our study, colonized patients revealed in our study a significant lower OS in univariate analysis as well as in multivariate analysis (HR 1.982, 95% CI 1.091–3.597; p = 0.025) due to a higher NRM compared to non-colonized patients (5-year cumulative incidence of NRM: 40.1% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.003). The main causes of mortality were infection (46.2% of all deaths) in colonized and relapse (56.4% of all deaths) in non-colonized patients. It is well known from MDRO (e.g. VRE, MRSA or multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria) that colonization is an important risk factor for developing an infection with the respective pathogen [32,33]. We found that 5/20 colonized patients (25%) developed an infection with S. maltophilia. An appropriate causal chain of colonization with S. maltophilia, severe infection with S. maltophilia and immediate death due to S. maltophilia has been found for one patient, who died directly attributable to a S. maltophilia BSI. In our study, 10% of all colonized patients died during neutropenia after allo-HSCT as inpatients due to infections whereas this was the case for only 2.2% of non-colonized patients died during neutropenia infection related after allo-HSCT (p = 0.098). Furthermore, colonized patients were admitted more frequently to the ICU (25% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.004) due to pulmonary infections (4/5 patients were transferred to the ICU due to pulmonary insufficiency). Though it is known that ICU stay is a risk factor for S. maltophilia infections [34,35,18], all five patients, which were transferred to the ICU in our study were colonized before their ICU admission. Interestingly, median time between admission and the first detection of S. maltophilia was 19.5 days (range 0–87 days), which represents the time of aGvHD (immediately after neutrophil engraftment), but the rates of aGvHD revealed no differences between colonized and non-colonized patients. Surprisingly, in addition to the slightly higher inpatient mortality, main differences in NRM between colonized and non-colonized patients appeared after 6 months due to infections and differences in OS appeared after 12 months.

There are three possible explanations for impaired OS as an outpatient in the colonized group: (i) colonized patients may die due to invasive infections with S. maltophilia but the low rate of broncho-alveolar lavages at our institution and the low sensitivity of culture techniques consequently lead to the missing proof of S. maltophilia infections. This explanation might be supported by the fact, that all colonized patients with fatal infections as an outpatient (n = 6, 56.4% of all deaths in colonized group) suffered from pulmonary infections. In 4/6 patients S. maltophilia was detected orally immediately before their death and S. maltophilia regularly cause lung infections in immunocompromised patients with high mortality [36] (ii) Other infections in the outpatient period (when patients left close clinical monitoring) occur more frequently in colonized patients. The immunomodulatory effects of S. maltophilia are well described [37] which may favor other infections. So, colonization with S. maltophilia might be a marker for a not fully hosted immune response after allo-HSCT and patients might die related to infections due to S. maltophilia immune dysregulation. (iii) S. maltophilia colonization might be a surrogate marker for medical unfit patients (or other unknown conditions), even if no differences in HCT-CI score could be found, e.g. with pre-existing lung diseases leading to later fatal outcome in the colonized group since all of the fatal infections in colonized patients were lung infections.

In our study, 2.1% (6/291) of all patients suffered from invasive infections caused by S. maltophilia. Other studies reported an infection rate of S. maltophilia of 5.6% (16/287 patients)[38] or 10.7% (25/234 patients)[31] in the setting of allo-HSCT, which is much higher than in our study. The difference might be due to the frequent usage of fluoroquinolones in colonized patients in 55% (11/20) of all cases at our center (30.2% of all patients received fluoroquinolones) and a susceptibility of S. maltophilia to these antibiotics in most of the patients in our cohort (18/20; 90%). The major advantage of our study is the large and homogenous AML patient cohort. Most of the baseline patient characteristics did not differ between the two groups and differing baseline characteristics (year of transplantation) did not influence the negative impact of S. maltophilia colonization on OS in multivariate analysis. It is especially important, that aGvHD and cGvHD cumulative incidences did not differ between both groups, because GvHD is one of the major risk factors for NRM after allo-HSCT [39,40].

We take into account that this is a retrospective study, direct causal conclusions can be drawn only to limited extend. Furthermore, the group of colonized patients consists of only 20 patients, therefore our results have to be interpreted carefully. It remains inconclusive if S. maltophilia causes infections leading to death in the period after transplantation or if it is a surrogate marker for an inadequate immune response or other unknown factors. We cannot fully address this question due to the small number of events in the colonized group and larger further prospective studies are needed.

We conclude that colonization with S. maltophilia is associated with an impaired OS after allo-HSCT due to higher rates of infection-related deaths. This might indicate to monitor colonized patients closely as outpatients due to a possibly increased susceptibility to infections. Further prospective studies are required to elucidate reasons of higher infection rates.

Supplementary Material

Open In Web Browser

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all technicians and physicians involved in pre-transplant procedures, allo-HSCT and care of patients as an outpatient.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science

PMC Copyright Notice

The articles available from the PMC site are protected by copyright, even though access is free. Copyright is held by the respective authors or publishers who provide these articles to PMC. Users of PMC are responsible for complying with the terms and conditions defined by the copyright holder.

Users should assume that standard copyright protection applies to articles in PMC, unless an article contains an explicit license statement that gives a user additional reuse or redistribution rights. PMC does not allow automated/bulk downloading of articles that have standard copyright protection.

See the copyright notice on the PMC site, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/copyright/, for further details and specific exceptions.

References

Norkin M, Wingard JR (2017) Recent advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. F1000Research 6: 870 10.12688/f1000research.11233.1 28663793

Kruger W, Russmann B, Kroger N, Salomon C, Ekopf N, Elsner HA et al (1999) Early infections in patients undergoing bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation—a 7 year single centre investigation of 409 cases. Bone Marrow Transplant 23 (6): 589–597. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701614 10217190

Ninin E, Milpied N, Moreau P, Andre-Richet B, Morineau N, Mahé B et al (2001) Longitudinal study of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in adult recipients of bone marrow transplants. Clin Infect Dis 33 (1): 41–47. 10.1086/320871 11389493

Poutsiaka DD, Price LL, Ucuzian A, Chan GW, Miller KB, Snydman DR (2007) Blood stream infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with increased mortality. Bone Marrow Transplant 40 (1): 63–70. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705690 17468772

Cappellano P, Viscoli C, Bruzzi P, van Lint MT, Pereira CAP, Bacigalupo A (2007) Epidemiology and risk factors for bloodstream infections after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantion. New Microbiol 30 (2): 89–99. 17619251

Mikulska M, Del Bono V, Bruzzi P, Raiola AM, Gualandi F, MT van Lint et al (2012) Mortality after bloodstream infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Infection 40 (3): 271–278. 10.1007/s15010-011-0229-y 22187340

Wang L, Wang Y, Fan X, Tang W, Hu J (2015) Prevalence of Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in Bloodstream Infection in Febrile Neutropenia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Medicine 94 (45): e1931 10.1097/MD.0000000000001931 26559260

Sostarich AM, Zolldann D, Haefner H, Luetticken R, Schulze-Roebecke R, Lemmen SW (2008) Impact of multiresistance of gram-negative bacteria in bloodstream infection on mortality rates and length of stay. Infection 36 (1): 31–35. 10.1007/s15010-007-6316-4 18231721

Looney WJ, Narita M, Mühlemann K (2009) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. An emerging opportunist human pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis 9 (5): 312–323. 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70083-0 19393961

Chang Y-T, Lin C-Y, Chen Y-H, Hsueh P-R (2015) Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options. Front Microbiol 6: 893 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00893 26388847

(2012) Hygienemassnahmen bei Infektionen oder Besiedlung mit multiresistenten gramnegativen Stabchen. Empfehlung der Kommission fur Kranken-haushygiene und Infektionspravention (KRINKO) beim Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 55 (10): 1311–1354.

Gales AC, Jones RN, Forward KR, Liñares J, Sader HS, Verhoef J (2001) Emerging importance of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as pathogens in seriously ill patients. Geographic patterns, epidemiological features, and trends in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–1999). Clin Infect Dis 32 Suppl 2: S104–13.11320451

Sader HS, Jones RN (2005) Antimicrobial susceptibility of uncommonly isolated non-enteric Gram-negative bacilli. Int J Antimicrob Agents 25 (2): 95–109. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.10.002 15664479

Farrell DJ, Sader HS, Jones RN (2010) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of a worldwide collection of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates tested against tigecycline and agents commonly used for S. maltophilia infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54 (6): 2735–2737. 10.1128/AAC.01774-09 20368399

Jones RN, Sader HS, Beach ML (2003) Contemporary in vitro spectrum of activity summary for antimicrobial agents tested against 18569 strains non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli isolated in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–2001). Int J Antimicrob Agents 22 (6): 551–556. 14659650

Gales AC, Jones RN, Sader HS (2006) Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54 731 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli. Report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001–2004). Clin Microbiol Infect 12 (4): 315–321. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01351.x 16524407

Sader HS, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Jones RN (2014) Variation in potency and spectrum of tigecycline activity against bacterial strains from U.S. medical centers since its approval for clinical use (2006 to 2012). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58 (4): 2274–2280. 10.1128/AAC.02684-13 24492361

Paez JIG, Costa SF (2008) Risk factors associated with mortality of infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 70 (2): 101–108. 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.05.020 18621440

Scheich S, Lindner S, Koenig R, Reinheimer C, Wichelhaus TA, Hogardt M et al (2017) Clinical impact of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms on outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer.

Scheich S, Reinheimer C, Brandt C, Wichelhaus TA, Hogardt M, Kempf VAJ et al (2017) Clinical Impact of Colonization with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms on Outcome after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: a Retrospective Single Center Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.

Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Burnett AK et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 115 (3): 453–474. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358 19880497

Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V et al (2009) Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15 (12): 1628–1633. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004 19896087

Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al (1995) 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 15 (6): 825–828. 7581076

Jagasia MH, Greinix HT, Arora M, Williams KM, Wolff D, Cowen EW et al (2015) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2014 Diagnosis and Staging Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21 (3): 389–401.e1. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.12.001 25529383

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). v4.03 2010. Retrieved from www.evs.nci.nih.gov. Accessed 18 April 2017.

Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG et al (2005) Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood 106 (8): 2912–2919. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004 15994282

Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49 (12): 1373–1379. 8970487

Labarca JA, Leber AL, Kern VL, Territo MC, Brankovic LE, Bruckner DA et al (2000) Outbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in allogenic bone marrow transplant patients: role of severe neutropenia and mucositis. Clin Infect Dis 30 (1): 195–197. 10.1086/313591 10619754

Lai C-H, Wong W-W, Chin C, Huang C- K, Lin H-H, Chen WF et al (2006) Central venous catheter-related Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteraemia and associated relapsing bacteraemia in haematology and oncology patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 12 (10): 986–991. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01511.x 16961635

Boktour M, Hanna H, Ansari S, Bahna B, Hachem R, Tarrand J et al (2006) Central venous catheter and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in cancer patients. Cancer 106 (9): 1967–1973. 10.1002/cncr.21846 16565968

Shiratori S, Wakasa K, Okada K, Sugita J, Akizawa K, Shigematsu A et al (2014) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience. Clin Transplant 28 (6): 656–661. 10.1111/ctr.12356 24628242

Corbella X, Pujol M, Ayats J, Sendra M, Ardanuy C, Domínguez MA et al (1996) Relevance of digestive tract colonization in the epidemiology of nosocomial infections due to multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Infect Dis 23 (2): 329–334. 8842272

Liss BJ, Vehreschild JJ, Cornely OA, Hallek M, Fatkenheuer G, Wisplinghoff H et al (2012) Intestinal colonisation and blood stream infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE) in patients with haematological and oncological malignancies. Infection 40 (6): 613–619. 10.1007/s15010-012-0269-y 22665143

Nseir S, Di Pompeo C, Brisson H, Dewavrin F, Tissier S, Diarra M et al (2006) Intensive care unit-acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Crit Care 10 (5): R143 10.1186/cc5063 17026755

Samonis G, Karageorgopoulos DE, Maraki S, Levis P, Dimopoulou D, Spernovasilis NA et al (2012) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections in a general hospital: patient characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and treatment outcome. PloS one 7 (5): e37375 10.1371/journal.pone.0037375 22624022

Mori M, Tsunemine H, Imada K, Ito K, Kodaka T, Takahashi T (2014) Life-threatening hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the treatment of hematologic diseases. Ann hematol 93 (6): 901–911. 10.1007/s00277-014-2028-x 24535696

Waters VJ, Gómez MI, Soong G, Amin S, Ernst RK, Prince A (2007) Immunostimulatory properties of the emerging pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Infect Immun 75 (4): 1698–1703. 10.1128/IAI.01469-06 17220304

Yeshurun M, Gafter-Gvili A, Thaler M, Keller N, Nagler A, Shimoni A (2010) Clinical characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a single center experience. Infection 38 (3): 211–215. 10.1007/s15010-010-0023-2 20425134

Elsabbagh EM, Shubert S, Leung K, Naik S, Gottschalk S, Allen C et al (2017) Acute GvHD Incidence and Outcome. Single Center Experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 23 (3): S231.

Goerner M, Gooley T, Flowers MED, Sullivan KM, Kiem H-P, Sanders JE et al (2002) Morbidity and mortality of chronic GVHD after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical siblings for patients with aplastic or refractory anemias. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 8 (1): 47–56. 11858190

[Back]

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics.

P-values reveals differences between colonized and non-colonized patients. Allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ELN, European Leukemia Net; CR, complete remission; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; MRD, matched related donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GvHD, Graft versus Host Disease, HCT-CI, hemtaopoetic stem cell transplantation comorbidity index.

Characteristics
All patients
(n = 291)
Non-colonized
(n = 271)
Colonized
(n = 20)
P-value

Year of allo-HSCT, median (range)
2012 (2006–2016)
2012 (2006–2016)
2009 (2006–2016)
0.050

Male sex, n (%)
173 (59.5)
160 (59)
13 (65)
0.646

Age at allo-HSCT, median (range)
54 (19–74)
53 (19–74)
57.5 (24–67)
0.303

De Novo AML, n (%)
195 (67)
184 (67.9)
11 (55)
0.324

ELN cytogenetic risk, n (%)

0.121

favorable
40 (13.7)
37 (13.7)
3 (15)

Intermediate I/II
186 (63.9)
177 (65.3)
9 (45)

adverse
65 (22.3)
57 (21)
8 (40)

Remission-status at allo-HSCT, n (%)

0.340

CR 1
137 (47.1)
129 (47.6)
8 (40)

≥CR2
35 (12)
34 (12.5)
1 (5)

Active disease
119 (40.9)
108 (39.9)
11 (55)

Conditioning MAC, n (%)
133 (45.7)
126 (46.5)
7 (35)
0.360

Graft type PBSC, n (%)
258 (88.7)
239 (88.2)
19 (95)
0.711

Donor type

0.802

MRD 10/10
76 (26.1)
70 (25.8)
6 (30)

MUD 10/10
137 (47.1)
129 (47.6)
8 (40)

MMUD 9/10 or 8/10
61 (21)
57 (21)
4 (20)

Haploidentical
17 (5.8)
15 (5.5)
2 (10)

CMV Recipient+/Donor-, n (%)
46 (15.8)
43 (15.9)
3 (15)
1.000

AB0-Mismatch, n (%)
157 (54)
145 (53.5)
12 (60)
0.648

GvHD prophylaxis: ATG containing, n (%)
217 (74.6)
204 (75.3)
13 (65)
0.298

Months from diagnosis/relapse to allo-HSCT, median (range)
3.07 (0.27–38.27)
3.07 (0.27–15.97)
3.28 (1.13–38.27)
0.930

HCT-CI

0.780

Low risk, n (%)
69 (23.7)
64 (23.6)
5 (25)

Intermediate risk, n (%)
93 (32)
88 (32.5)
5 (25)

High risk, n (%)
129 (44.3)
119 (43.9)
10 (50)

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201169.t001

[Back]

[Back]

Table 2. Transplant-related characteristics and outcomes.

P-values reveal differences between colonized and non-colonized patients. ANC, absolute neutrophil count; PLT, platelets; aGvHD, acute Graft versus Host Disease; cGvHD, chronic Graft versus Host Disease MDRO, multidrug resistant organisms; BIS, bloodstream infection; allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. OS, Overall survival, 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NRM, non-relapse mortality; GvHD, Graft versus Host Disease.

Characteristics
All patients
(n = 291)
Non-colonized
(n = 271)
Colonized
(n = 20)
P-value

Engraftment ANC > 0.5 × 10⁹/l (days), median (range)
18 (9–36)
18 (10–36)
16 (9–28)
0.077

Engraftment PLT > 50 × 10⁹/l (days), median (range)
19 (9–1575)
19.5 (9–1575)
19 (14–67)
0.306

Length of hospital stay (days), median (range)
42 (7–180)
41 (7–180)
52.5 (31–153)
0.011

Neutropenic fever, n (%)
245 (84.2)
226 (83.4)
19 (95)
0.218

C. diff toxin positive, n (%)
49 (16.8)
44 (16.2)
5 (25)
0.350

Mucositis grade 3/4, n (%)
124 (42.6)
115 (42.4)
9 (45)
0.819

Cumulative incidence of aGvHD, % (95% CI)
50.5 (44.7, 56.3)
49.6 (43.5, 55.7)
63.2 (40.5, 85.9)
0.202

Cumulative incidence of aGvHD grade 3/4, % (95% CI)
10.2 (6.7, 13.7)
9.5 (6, 13)
21.1 (2.2, 40)
0.099

Cumulative incidence of cGvHD, % (95% CI)
47.9 (41.7, 54.1)
47.7 (41.3, 54.1)
50 (25.6, 74.4)
0.664

Cumulative incidence of severe cGvHD, % (95% CI)
12.1 (8.1, 16.1)
11.8 (7.7, 15.9)
16.7 (0, 34.7)
0.558

Intensive care unit stay, n (%)
18 (6.2)
13 (4.8)
5 (25)
0.004

Bloodstream infections, n (%)
88 (30.2)
79 (29.2)
9 (45)
0.205

S. maltophilia infection, n (%)
6 (2.1)
1 (0.4)
5 (25)
<0.001

S. maltophilia BSI infection, n (%)
2 (0.7)
0
2 (10)
0.005

CMV-reactivation, n (%)
N = 201
112 (55.7)
N = 187
107 (57.2)
N = 14
5 (35.7)
0.163

Other viral infection during allo-HSCT, n (%)
84 (28.9)
78 (28.8)
6 (30)
1.000

Estimated OS, % (95% CI)

0.007

6 months OS
87.9 (84.2, 91.6)
88.1(84.2, 92)
85 (69.3, 100)

12 months OS
80.8 (76.3, 85.3)
81.6 (76.9, 86.3)
69.1(48.5, 89.7)

48 months OS
60 (53.7, 66.3)
62.1(55.6, 68.6)
33 (8.5, 57.5)

60 months OS
57 (50.3, 63.7)
59.7 (53, 66.4)
24.7 (1.6, 47.8)

Cumulative incidence of NRM, % (95% CI)

0.003

6 months OS
5.5 (3.4, 7.6)
4.8 (2.2, 7.4)
15 (0, 31.1)

12 months OS
9.4 (6, 12.8)
8.2 (4.9, 11.5)
25 (5.4, 44.6)

48 months OS
17 (12.1, 21.9)
15.3 (10.5, 20.1)
40.1 (14.4, 65.8)

60 months OS
17.9 (12.8, 23)
16.2 (11.1, 21.3)
40.1(14.4, 65.8)

5-year Cumulative incidence of relapse, % (95% CI)
34.6 (28.2, 41)
34.2 (27.6, 40.8)
37.9 (8.7, 67.1)
0.927

Death caused by, n (%/% of all deaths)

0.021

infection
29 (10/9.1)
23 (8.5/23.7)
6 (30/46.2)

relapse
62 (21.3/56.4)
57 (21/58.8)
5 (25/38.5)

GvHD
7 (2.4/6.4)
7 (2.6/7.2)
0

others
11(3.8/10)
10 (3.7/10.3)
1 (5/7.7)

unknown
1 (0.3/0.9)
0
1 (5/7.7)

Death in neutropenia after allo-HSCT, n (%)
8 (2.8)
6 (2.2)
2 (10)
0.098

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201169.t002

[Back]

[Back]

Fig 1. Overall survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

(A) Overall survival of all patients. (B) Overall survival stratified by colonization (dotted line) with S. maltophilia.

[Back]

[Back]

Fig 2.

Cumulative incidence of non-relapse related mortality (A) and cumulative incidence of relapse (B) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, stratified by colonized (dotted line) and non-colonized (solid line) patients.

[Back]

[Back]

Table 3. Multivariate analysis for overall survival.

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; allo-HSCT, allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ELN, European Leukemia Net. Of all S.maltophilia colonized patients (n = 20), 15 (75%) were also colonized by an MDRO as described previously[19].

Risk Factor | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value
Stenotrophomas maltophilia-colonization | 1.982 | 1.091–3.597 | 0.025
Year of allo-HSCT ≥2012 | 1.059 | 0.715–1.569 | 0.775
Intermediate ELN (vs. favorable) | 1.392 | 0.712–2.722 | 0.334
Adverse ELN (vs. favorable) | 2.319 | 1.138–4.726 | 0.021
Age > 60 | 1.276 | 0.847–1.921 | 0.243

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201169.t003

[Back]