• search hit 56 of 5467
Back to Result List

Prognostic value of the CLIF‐C AD score in patients with implantation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

  • Prognostic assessment of patients with liver cirrhosis allocated for implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a challenging task in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to assess the prognostic value of the CLIF‐C AD (Acute Decompensation) score in patients with TIPS implantation. Transplant‐free survival (TFS) and 3‐month mortality were reviewed in 880 patients who received de novo TIPS implantation for the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension. The prognostic value of the CLIF‐C AD score was compared with the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Child‐Pugh score, and albumin‐bilirubin (ALBI) score using Harrell’s C concordance index. The median TFS after TIPS implantation was 40.0 (34.6‐45.4) months. The CLIF‐C AD score (c = 0.635 [0.609‐0.661]) was superior in the prediction of TFS in comparison to MELD score (c = 0.597 [0.570‐0.623], P = 0.006), Child‐Pugh score (c = 0.579 [0.552‐0.606], P < 0.001), and ALBI score (c = 0.573 [0.545‐0.600], P < 0.001). However, the CLIF‐C AD score did not perform significantly better than the MELD‐Na score (c = 0.626 [0.599‐0.653], P = 0.442). There were no profound differences in the scores’ ranking with respect to indication for TIPS implantation, stent type, or underlying liver disease. Subgroup analyses revealed that a CLIF‐C AD score >45 was a predictor of 3‐month mortality in the supposed low‐risk group of patients with a MELD score ≤12 (14.7% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The CLIF‐C AD score is suitable for prognostic assessment of patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension receiving TIPS implantation. In the prediction of TFS, the CLIF‐C AD score is superior to MELD score, Child‐Pugh score, and ALBI score but not the MELD‐Na score.
Metadaten
Author:Lukas SturmORCiDGND, Michael PraktiknjoORCiDGND, Dominik BettingerORCiDGND, Jan Patrick HuberGND, Lara Volkwein, Arthur SchmidtGND, Rafael Simon Peter KäserGND, Johannes ChangORCiD, Christian JansenORCiDGND, Carsten Meyer, Daniel Thomas, Robert ThimmeORCiDGND, Jonel TrebickaORCiDGND, Michael SchultheißGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-832637
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1654
ISSN:2471-254X
Pubmed Id:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33860123
Parent Title (English):Hepatology communications
Publisher:Wolters Kluwer Health
Place of publication:[Alphen aan den Rijn]
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2021/01/05
Date of first Publication:2021/01/05
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2024/09/23
Volume:5
Issue:4
Page Number:11
First Page:650
Last Page:660
Note:
Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR57 P18 and CRC1382), H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology (668031 and 825694), Fundaci¢n Cellex (PREDICT), and H2020 Society (731875).
Note:
Open access funding enabled and organized by ProjektDEAL.
HeBIS-PPN:522297692
Institutes:Medizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International