(Conflict) principles of European (consumer) contract law : an update
- In April 2003 I commented on the European Commission’s Action Plan on a More Coherent European Contract Law [COM(2003) 68 final] and the Green Paper on the Modernisation of the 1980 Rome Convention [COM(2002) 654 final].1 While the main argument of that paper, i.e. the common neglect of the inherent interrelation between both the further harmonisation of substantive contract law by directives or through an optional European Civil Code on the one hand and the modernisation of conflict rules for consumer contracts in Art. 5 Rome Convention on the other hand, remain pressing issues, and as the German Law Journal continues its efforts in offering timely and critical analysis on consumer law issues,2 there is a variety of recent developments worth noting.
Author: | Gralf-Peter CalliessORCiDGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-15702 |
ISSN: | 2071-8322 |
Parent Title (German): | German law journal |
Publisher: | [s. n.] |
Place of publication: | Frankfurt, M. |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Date of Publication (online): | 2005/09/22 |
Year of first Publication: | 2004 |
Publishing Institution: | Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg |
Release Date: | 2005/09/22 |
Volume: | 5 |
Issue: | 8 |
Page Number: | 11 |
First Page: | 957 |
Last Page: | 967 |
Source: | German Law Journal Vol 5 No 8 (August 2004) S.957-967, http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=483 |
HeBIS-PPN: | 191266620 |
Institutes: | Rechtswissenschaft / Rechtswissenschaft |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht |
Licence (German): | ![]() |