• Treffer 6 von 6
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Real-life survey of pitfalls and successes of precision medicine in genetic epilepsies

  • Objective: The term ‘precision medicine’ describes a rational treatment strategy tailored to one person that reverses or modifies the disease pathophysiology. In epilepsy, single case and small cohort reports document nascent precision medicine strategies in specific genetic epilepsies. The aim of this multicentre observational study was to investigate the deeper complexity of precision medicine in epilepsy. Methods: A systematic survey of patients with epilepsy with a molecular genetic diagnosis was conducted in six tertiary epilepsy centres including children and adults. A standardised questionnaire was used for data collection, including genetic findings and impact on clinical and therapeutic management. Results: We included 293 patients with genetic epilepsies, 137 children and 156 adults, 162 females and 131 males. Treatment changes were undertaken because of the genetic findings in 94 patients (32%), including rational precision medicine treatment and/or a treatment change prompted by the genetic diagnosis, but not directly related to known pathophysiological mechanisms. There was a rational precision medicine treatment for 56 patients (19%), and this was tried in 33/56 (59%) and was successful (ie, >50% seizure reduction) in 10/33 (30%) patients. In 73/293 (25%) patients there was a treatment change prompted by the genetic diagnosis, but not directly related to known pathophysiological mechanisms, and this was successful in 24/73 (33%). Significance: Our survey of clinical practice in specialised epilepsy centres shows high variability of clinical outcomes following the identification of a genetic cause for an epilepsy. Meaningful change in the treatment paradigm after genetic testing is not yet possible for many people with epilepsy. This systematic survey provides an overview of the current application of precision medicine in the epilepsies, and suggests the adoption of a more considered approach.

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Simona Balestrini, Daniela Chiarello, Maria Gogou, Katri Silvennoinen, Clinda Puvirajasinghe, Wendy D. Jones, Philipp Sebastian ReifGND, Karl Martin KleinORCiD, Felix RosenowORCiDGND, Yvonne G. Weber, Holger LercheORCiDGND, Susanne Schubert-BastORCiDGND, Ingo Borggräfe, Antonietta Coppola, Serena Troisi, Rikke S. MøllerORCiDGND, Antonella Riva, Pasquale StrianoORCiDGND, Federico ZaraORCiD, Cheryl Hemingway, Carla Marini, Anna Rosati, Davide Mei, Martino Montomoli, Renzo GuerriniORCiDGND, J. Helen Cross, Sanjay M. SisodiyaORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-644436
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325932
ISSN:1468-330X
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch):Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
Verlag:BMJ Publishing Group
Verlagsort:London
Dokumentart:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Veröffentlichung (online):15.09.2021
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:15.09.2021
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Datum der Freischaltung:21.01.2022
Jahrgang:92
Ausgabe / Heft:10
Seitenzahl:9
Erste Seite:1044
Letzte Seite:1052
Bemerkung:
This work was supported by Epilepsy Society, UK. Part of this work was undertaken at University College London Hospitals, which received a proportion of funding from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. SB was supported by the Muir Maxwell Trust and the Epilepsy Society. KS was supported by a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (WT104033AIA). AR, PS and FZ developed this work within the framework of the DINOGMI Department of Excellence of MIUR 2018–2022 (legge 232 del 2016).
HeBIS-PPN:491337000
Institute:Medizin
DDC-Klassifikation:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0