• search hit 7 of 56
Back to Result List

How to save a constitutional democracy: a comment by Dieter Grimm

  • Ginsburg and Huq analyze the processes of democratic backsliding and perverting democratic constitutionalism in various countries and ask whether an intelligent constitutional design would be able to prevent this from happening or make it at least more difficult. They do so not out of pure academic interest, but with the intention to protect liberal democratic constitutionalism because they believe it to be morally superior to alternative models.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Dieter GrimmGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-549924
DOI:https://doi.org/10.17176/20190324-203315-0
Parent Title (German):Verfassungsblog
Publisher:Verfassungsblog.de
Place of publication:Berlin
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2019
Date of first Publication:2019/03/10
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2020/07/06
Tag:Constitutionalism; Democratic Backsliding
Issue:2019/3/10
Page Number:4
First Page:1
Last Page:4
Note:
LICENSED UNDER CC BY NC ND
HeBIS-PPN:46750878X
Institutes:Rechtswissenschaft / Rechtswissenschaft
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung-Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung 4.0