Bad theory, wrong conclusions: M. Halle on Slavic accentuation

  • Twenty years ago (1983), I severely criticized Halle and Kiparsky’s review (1981) of Garde’s history of Slavic accentuation (1976). I concluded that Halle and Ki-parsky’s theoretical framework “rests upon an unwarranted limitation of the available evidence, obscures the chronological perspective, and yields results which are partly not new and partly incorrect. It is harmful because it does not give the facts their proper due and thereby blocks the road to empirical study, giving a free hand to unrestrained speculation” (1983: 40). As Halle has recently returned to the subject (2001), it may be interesting to see if there has been some progress in his thinking over the last two decades. In the following I shall try to avoid repeating what I have said in my earlier discussion.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Frederik H. H. KortlandtGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1156889
URL:http://www.kortlandt.nl/publications/art207e.pdf
Parent Title (German):Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 30: Dutch contributions to the 13th international congress of slavists: Linguistics
Publisher:Rodopi
Place of publication:Amsterdam ; New York
Document Type:Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2010/07/07
Year of first Publication:2003
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2010/07/07
GND Keyword:Phonologie
Page Number:4
First Page:237
Last Page:240
Note:
Korrigierte Version
Source:http://www.kortlandt.nl/publications/art207e.pdf ; (in:) Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 30: Dutch contributions to the 13th international congress of slavists: Linguistics, 2003, S. 237-240
HeBIS-PPN:264634411
Dewey Decimal Classification:4 Sprache / 40 Sprache / 400 Sprache
4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
Sammlungen:Linguistik
Licence (German):License LogoDeutsches Urheberrecht