Evaluating how child allowances and daycare subsidies affect fertility

  • We compare the cost effectiveness of two pronatalist policies: (a) child allowances; and (b) daycare subsidies. We pay special attention to estimating how intended fertility (fertility before children are born) responds to these policies. We use two evaluation tools: (i) a dynamic model on fertility, labor supply, outsourced childcare time, parental time, asset accumulation and consumption; and (ii) randomized vignette-survey policy experiments. We implement both tools in the United States and Germany, finding consistent evidence that daycare subsidies are more cost effective. Nevertheless, the required public expenditure to increase fertility to the replacement level might be viewed as prohibitively high.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Joshua Robert Goldstein, Christos Koulovatianos, Jian Li, Carsten Schröder
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-430067
URL:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2918877
Parent Title (English):Center for Financial Studies (Frankfurt am Main): CFS working paper series ; No. 568
Series (Serial Number):CFS working paper series (568)
Publisher:Center for Financial Studies
Place of publication:Frankfurt, M.
Document Type:Working Paper
Language:English
Year of Completion:2017
Year of first Publication:2017
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2017/03/14
Tag:childcare; fertility; labor supply; public policy; vignette survey method
Issue:This version: January 31, 2017
HeBIS-PPN:400988984
Institutes:Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Wissenschaftliche Zentren und koordinierte Programme / Center for Financial Studies (CFS)
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoDeutsches Urheberrecht