Strong impact of MammaPrint and BluePrint on treatment decisions in luminal early breast cancer: results of the WSG-PRIMe study

  • Purpose: The WSG-PRIMe Study prospectively evaluated the impact of the 70-gene signature MammaPrint® (MP) and the 80-gene molecular subtyping assay BluePrint® on clinical therapy decisions in luminal early breast cancer. Methods: 452 hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative patients were recruited (N0, N1). Physicians provided initial therapy recommendations based on clinicopathological factors. After prospective risk classification by MammaPrint/BluePrint was revealed, post-test treatment recommendations and actual treatment were recorded. Decisional Conflict and anxiety were measured by questionnaires. Results: Post-test switch (in chemotherapy (CT) recommendation) occurred in 29.1% of cases. Overall, physician adherence to MP risk assessment was 92.3% for low-risk and 94.3% for high-risk MP scores. Adherence was remarkably high in “discordant” groups: 74.7% of physicians initially recommending CT switched to CT omission following low-risk MP scores; conversely, 88.9% of physicians initially recommending CT omission switched to CT recommendations following high-risk MP scores. Most patients (99.2%) recommended to forgo CT post-test and 21.3% of patients with post-test CT recommendations did not undergo CT; among MP low-risk patients with pre-test and post-test CT recommendations, 40% did not actually undergo CT. Luminal subtype assessment by BluePrint was discordant with IHC assessment in 34% of patients. Patients’ State Anxiety scores improved significantly overall, particularly in MP low-risk patients. Trait Anxiety scores increased slightly in MP high risk and decreased slightly in MP low-risk patients. Conclusions: MammaPrint and BluePrint test results strongly impacted physicians’ therapy decisions in luminal EBC with up to three involved lymph nodes. The high adherence to genetically determined risk assessment represents a key prerequisite for achieving a personalized cost-effective approach to disease management of early breast cancer.
Metadaten
Author:Rachel WürstleinORCiDGND, Ronald E. Kates, Oleg Gluz, Eva-Maria GrischkeORCiDGND, Christian Schem, Marc Thill, Stephan Hasmüller, Andreas Köhler, Burkhard Otremba, Frank GriesingerGND, Christian Schindlbeck, Andreas Trojan, Florian Otto, Michael Knauer, Renate Pusch, Nadia HarbeckORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-534146
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05075-x
ISSN:1573-7217
ISSN:0167-6806
Pubmed Id:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30796651
Parent Title (English):Breast cancer research and treatment
Publisher:Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Place of publication:Dordrecht [u. a.]
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2019
Date of first Publication:2019/02/22
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Contributing Corporation:WSG-PRIMe investigators in Germany, Austria, Switzerland
Release Date:2020/04/27
Tag:BluePrint; Breast cancer; Decision impact; Diagnostic test; MammaPrint; Molecular profiling
Volume:175
Page Number:11
First Page:389
Last Page:399
Note:
Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
HeBIS-PPN:465941680
Institutes:Medizin / Medizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0