Provenance and distribution networks of the earliest bronze in the Maritime Territory (Primorye), Russian Far East

  • Metal artifacts from the Paleometal Epoch (ca. 1100 BC–400 AD) of the Primorye (Russian Far East) have shed new light on the introduction of the earliest bronzes into the Pacific coastal areas of prehistoric Eurasia. However, little is known about raw material circulation and the role of metal in the context of inter-regional exchange. This paper investigates 12 copper artifacts from major Paleometal settlements using alloy composition, trace elements, and lead isotopes to explore the metal sources and distribution networks. The results suggest that most objects are made of a copper-tin alloy, but some have arsenic as a significant minor element . Geologically, copper is unlikely to have come from local ore sources, but rather from the Liaoxi corridor and Liaodong Peninsula in Northeast China. This may indicate an inland route of metal trade across Northeast China or alternately, a coastal route via the northern Korean Peninsula. Archaeologically, the combined study of artifact typology and chemistry indicates two possible origins for the metal: the Upper Xiajiadian culture in Northeast China and Slab Grave culture in Mongolia/Transbaikal. Remarkably, the connection with Upper Xiajiadian communities parallels the transport route along which millet agriculture spread from Northeast China to the Primorye during the Neolithic.
Metadaten
Author:Yiu-Kang HsuORCiD, Sabine KleinGND, Rebecca O’SullivanORCiDGND, Irina S. Zhushchikhovskaya, Alexander N. PopovORCiD, Nikolaj Aleksandrovič Kljuev, Yury G. Nikitin, Elena Sidorenko
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-628054
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2021.1958110
ISSN:1556-1828
Parent Title (English):Journal of island and coastal archaeology
Publisher:Routledge
Place of publication:London [u.a.]
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2021/09/08
Date of first Publication:2021/09/08
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2022/07/11
Tag:Northeast Asia; Paleometal Epoch; bronze metallurgy; chemical and lead isotope analysis; provenance
Volume:2021
Issue:online version before inclusion in an issue
Page Number:22
First Page:1
Last Page:22
Note:
This study was carried out at the Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochum (DBM) and received great support from Professor Thomas Stöllner’s project “Resources in Societies,” funded by the Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (SAW-2017-DBM-3).
Note:
FIERCE is financially supported by the Wilhelm and Else Heraeus Foundation and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, INST 161/921-1 FUGG and INST 161/923-1 FUGG), which is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to the Office of China Postdoc Council via Jilin University, which provided financial support during the lengthy writeup of this article. Our Russian colleagues received funding from the Russian Science Foundation on the project “Archaeology of the Russian Far East” (N 20-18-00081) as well as the Russian Foundation for Basic Research on the project “Periphery focuses of culture-historical development in the Russian Far East, Northeast China and Korea peninsular during Paleometal epoch” (N 18-09-40101).
Note:
Early View: Online Version of Record before inclusion in an issue.
HeBIS-PPN:502093412
Institutes:Geowissenschaften / Geographie
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 55 Geowissenschaften, Geologie / 550 Geowissenschaften
9 Geschichte und Geografie / 93 Geschichte des Altertums (bis ca. 499), Archäologie / 930 Geschichte des Altertums bis ca. 499, Archäologie
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0