Conservative versus early surgical treatment in the management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Oral e-Poster Presentations - Booth 2: Spine 1 (Trauma&Misc), September 25, 2023, 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM Background: Spondylodiscitis is a prevalent type of spinal infection, with pyogenic spondylodiscitis being the most common subtype. While antibiotic therapy is the standard treatment, some argue that early surgery can aid in infection clearance, improve survival rates, and prevent long-term complications such as deformities. However, others view early surgery as excessively risky. Due to the high mortality rate of up to 20%, it is crucial to determine the most effective treatment. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to compare the mortality rate, relapse rate, and length of hospital stay for conservative and early surgical treatments of pyogenic spondylodiscitis, including determinants of outcomes. The study was registered on PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42022312573. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and JSTOR were searched for original studies comparing conservative and early surgical treatments of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The included studies were assessed using the ROBINS-1 tool, and eligible studies were evaluated using meta-analyses, influence, and regression analyses. Results: The systematic review included 31 studies. The meta-analysis, which had a pooled sample size of 10,954 patients from 21 studies, found that the pooled mortality rate among patients treated with early surgery was 8%, while the rate was 13% for patients treated conservatively. The mean proportion of relapse/failure was 15% for patients treated with early surgery and 21% for those treated conservatively. Furthermore, the analysis concluded that early surgical treatment is associated with a 40% and 39% risk reduction in relapse/failure and mortality rates, respectively, when compared to conservative management. Additionally, early surgical treatment resulted in a 7.75-day reduction in length of hospital stay per patient (p<0.01). The most highly significant predictors of treatment outcome were found to be intravenous drug use, diabetes, the presence of an epidural abscess, positive cultures, location of infection, and age (p<0.001). Conclusions: Overall, early surgical management was found to be consistently significantly more effective than conservative management in terms of relapse/failure and mortality rates when treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis, particularly for non-spinal epidural abscess spondylodiscitis.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Santhosh ThavarajasingamORCiD, Kalyan V. VemulapalliORCiD, Vishnu K. Sajeenth, Hariharan Subbiah PonniahORCiD, Alexander Sanchez Maroto-VogelGND, Robert VardanyanORCiD, Jonathan Andreas Hans-Günter NeuhoffGND, Andreas KramerGND, Andreas K. DemetriadesORCiDGND, Ehab ShibanORCiDGND, Florian Alexander RingelORCiDGND, Benjamin M. Davies
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-788152
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2023.102058
ISSN:2772-5294
Parent Title (English):Brain and Spine
Publisher:Elsevier
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Document Type:Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2023/09/26
Date of first Publication:2023/09/26
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Contributing Corporation:European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Congress (2023 : Barcelona)
Release Date:2023/10/28
Volume:3
Issue:Supplement 1, 102058
Article Number:102058
Page Number:2
HeBIS-PPN:513398074
Institutes:Medizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International