TY  - CHAP
A1  - Pittner, Karin
T1  - Process, eventuality and wieder/again
T2  - Interface explorations ; 4, Modifying adjuncts / ed. by Ewald Lang, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Claudia Maienborn
N2  - This paper argues for a scopal explanation of the readings of the adverb wieder (‘again’). It is the syntactic entity that wieder is related to which determines whether the repetitive or the restitutive reading obtains. If it is adjoined to the minimal verbal domain, it relates to a situation-internal state thus producing a restitutive interpretation, if adjoined to a higher verbal projection, it relates to an eventuality resulting in a repetitive interpretation. Proceeding from the assumption that adverbial adjuncts have base positions which reflect their semantic relations to the rest of the sentence, repetitive wieder is shown to belong to the class of eventuality adverbs that minimally c-command the base positions of all arguments, whereas restitutive wieder has many properties in common with process (manner) adjuncts that minimally c-command the verb in clause-final base position.
KW  - Morphologie
Y1  - 2003
UR  - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/12598
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1134907
UR  - http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Karin.Pittner/PittnerEND_B.pdf
SN  - 978-3-11-017352-9
SP  - 365
EP  - 391
PB  - de Gruyter
CY  - Berlin
ER  -