TY  - JOUR
A1  - Wilson, John R. U.
A1  - García-Díaz, Pablo
A1  - Cassey, Phillip
A1  - Richardson, David M.
A1  - Pyšek, Petr
A1  - Blackburn, Tim M.
T1  - Biological invasions and natural colonisations are different – the need for invasion science
T2  - NeoBiota
N2  - In a recent Discussion Paper, Hoffmann and Courchamp (2016) posed the question: are biological invasions and natural colonisations that different? This apparently simple question resonates at the core of the biological study of human-induced global change, and we strongly believe that the answer is yes: biological invasions and natural colonisations differ in processes and mechanisms in ways that are crucial for science, management, and policy. Invasion biology has, over time, developed into the broader transdisciplinary field of invasion science. At the heart of invasion science is the realisation that biological invasions are not just a biological phenomenon: the human dimension of invasions is a fundamental component in the social-ecological systems in which invasions need to be understood and managed.
KW  - Invasion science
KW  - invasion biology
KW  - definitions
Y1  - 2016
UR  - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/45596
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-455968
VL  - 2016
IS  - 31
SP  - 87
EP  - 98
ER  -