TY - JOUR A1 - Aggensteiner, Pascal A1 - Albrecht, Björn A1 - Strehl, Ute A1 - Wörz, Sonja A1 - Ruckes, Christian Rainer A1 - Freitag, Christine M. A1 - Rothenberger, Aribert A1 - Gevensleben, Holger A1 - Millenet, Sabina A1 - Hohmann, Sarah A1 - Banaschewski, Tobias A1 - Legenbauer, Tanja A1 - Holtmann, Martin A1 - Brandeis, Daniel T1 - Can neurophysiological markers of anticipation and attention predict ADHD severity and neurofeedback outcomes? T2 - Biological psychology N2 - Abstract: Neurophysiological measures of preparation and attention are often atypical in ADHD. Still, replicated findings that these measures predict which patients improve after Neurofeedback (NF), reveal neurophysiological specificity, and reflect ADHD-severity are limited. Methods: We analyzed children’s preparatory (CNV) and attentional (Cue-P3) brain activity and behavioral performance during a cued Continuous Performance Task (CPT) before and after slow cortical potential (SCP)-NF or semi-active control treatment (electromyogram biofeedback). Mixed-effects models were performed with 103 participants at baseline and 77 were assessed for pre-post comparisons focusing on clinical outcome prediction, specific neurophysiological effects of NF, and associations with ADHD-severity. Results: Attentional and preparatory brain activity and performance were non-specifically reduced after treatment. Preparatory activity in the SCP-NF group increased with clinical improvement. Several performance and brain activity measures predicted non-specific treatment outcome. Conclusion: Specific neurophysiological effects after SCP-NF were limited to increased neural preparation associated with improvement on ADHD-subscales, but several performance and neurophysiological measures of attention predicted treatment outcome and reflected symptom severity in ADHD. The results may help to optimize treatment. KW - Neurofeedback KW - Slow Cortical Potentials, SCP KW - Randomized Controlled Trial KW - Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) KW - Sustained attention KW - Response control KW - Continuous Performance Test, CPT KW - Contingent Negative Variation, CNV KW - Cue-P3 KW - Event related potentials Y1 - 2021 UR - http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/64426 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-644263 SN - 1873-6246 N1 - This study was funded by the German Research Foundation DFG HO 2503/4-1 and 2503/4-2. The funding body had no influence on the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the paper for publication. VL - 165 IS - art. 108169 SP - 1 EP - 12 PB - Elsevier Science CY - Amsterdam [u.a.] ER -