Leukemia

Leukemia. 31(3): 731-734

Plastic CD34 and CD38 expression in adult B–cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia explains ambiguity of leukemia-initiating stem cell populations

F Lang¹⁷, B Wojcik¹⁷, S Bothur¹²³, C Knecht¹, J H F Falkenburg⁴, T Schroeder⁵, H Serve¹²³, O G Ottmann⁶, M A Rieger¹²³*

1. LOEWE Center for Cell and Gene Therapy and Department for Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

2. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany

3. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

4. Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

5. Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering (D-BSSE), ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland

6. Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

*. E-mail: m.rieger@em.uni-frankfurt.de

7. These authors contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2017 The Author(s)

DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.315

Published in print: March 2017

Published online: 13 December 2016

B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy of bone-marrow (BM)-derived lymphoid precursor cells at various stages of differentiation.¹ Although first-line therapy with chemotherapy and—in the case of BCR-ABL1 positive ALL—tyrosine kinase inhibitors is initially highly effective with remission rates of >90%, the overall survival rate in adult patients is 40–50% across all risk groups.1, 2, 3 Relapse originates from putative leukemia-initiating cells (LICs) that are intrinsically resistant to chemotherapeutic regimens, which may explain the poor long-term prognosis of patients with disease recurrence. Eradication of LICs thus is a principal aim of novel therapeutic approaches. A prerequisite for developing effective LIC-targeted treatments is the ability to identify and clinically monitor LICs in ALL, a goal that has to date been elusive. The existence, phenotype, biological properties and the hierarchical organization of LICs in BCP-ALL remain highly controversial.⁴

The prospective enrichment of LICs in ALL using the surface markers CD34 and CD38 (also in combination with other markers)—as well-established in acute myelogenous leukemia5, 6, 7, 8—largely failed, resulting in highly variable results.9, 10, 11, 12 We investigated the reason for these ambiguous results by observing the expression of these markers even at single cell level in high temporal resolution.

We found that CD34 and CD38 are highly plastic on individual BCP-ALL cells and are up- or downregulated in one cell generation within hours, and may not be useful for prospective LIC isolation.

To investigate the plasticity of CD34 and CD38 surface marker expression in BCP-ALL, we utilized a unique ALL patient-derived long-term cell culture system (PDLTCs) established from patient PH.¹³ The PDLTC-PH reflects the polyclonal propensity of the disease and remains genetically and functionally stable in culture for more than 6 months (Nijmeijer et al.¹³ and data not shown). Furthermore, we achieved to generate isogenic clonal PDLTC-PH subcultures, which are invaluable to investigate relations between phenotypes and distinct function.

First, we confirmed the presence of cells with LIC activity in PDLTC-PH by injecting 5 × 10⁶ unsorted bulk cells intravenously into sublethally-irradiated immune-compromised NSG mice, revealing human ALL cell engraftment and leukemia progression in the peripheral blood (PB) of the recipients via FACS as well as their survival (Figure 1a, Supplementary Methods). After 62 days, we found the first ALL cells in the PB, and the human ALL cell chimerism successively increased over time until the mice died of the disease after 119 days in average (±4.6 days), with a high proportion of ALL cells in the BM (Figure 1a). After confirming the existence of LICs in PDLTC-PH, we checked for the cell surface expression of CD34 (APC clone 8G12, BD, Heidelberg, Germany) and CD38 (PE clone HB7 eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany) in these PDLTCs via FACS (FACS Canto, BD). These are indicative surface markers to determine normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor populations, and LIC-enriched fractions in acute myelogenous leukemia.5, 6, 7, 8 We revealed a typical pattern of at least four subpopulations based on differential CD34 and CD38 expression (Figure 1b). Next, we prospectively isolated three subpopulations based on their differential CD34 and CD38 surface expression (CD34+CD38−, CD34+CD38+, CD34−CD38+) via FACS sorting (FACS Aria, BD) and transplanted 1 × 10⁶ living cells into sublethally irradiated NSG recipients by tail vein injection (Figure 1c). As demonstrated before,9, 10, 11, 12 the markers CD34/CD38 did not help to enrich for LICs in PDLTC-PH. All three subpopulations showed very similar engraftments and leukemia progression in vivo (Figure 1c).

Despite the fact that PDLTC-PH consists of distinctive cell populations according to the well-described stem/progenitor markers CD34/CD38, all tested subpopulations have identical leukemogenic potential irrespective of their CD34/CD38 expression pattern. Next, we wanted to test whether these two surface markers are stably expressed over time. Therefore, we prospectively isolated four subpopulations based on their distinctive CD34/CD38 expression via FACS and cultured them for 3 months (Figure 2a). The FACS analysis after 30 days and 90 days of culture revealed a return of the FACS profile to the starting culture, all four subpopulations have re-emerged over time. Interestingly, only CD34+CD38− cells remained more stable in their marker profile and a large proportion of cells maintained CD34+CD38− over time (Figure 2a). This observation would argue against a more immature stage of these cells as anticipated by the HSPC-like CD34+/CD38− expression pattern seen in normal hematopoiesis. To exclude the possibility that reversion of the marker profile was attributed to selection and outgrowth of contaminating cells resulting from cell sort impurities and to evaluate the dynamics of this process, we increased our temporal resolution and repeatedly checked the surface marker expression already a few hours after prospective cell isolation via FACS (Supplementary Figure S1). Strikingly, we noticed a successive increase in marker-reverted populations starting already 2 h after isolation (Supplementary Figure S1). To further confirm that the marker reversion truly originates from individual cells, we FACS-sorted hundreds of individual cells of all four CD34/CD38 quadrants and established single clonal-derived subcultures of PDLTC-PH (Figure 2b). The clonal outgrowth varied between 10.4% (CD34−CD38−) and 16.5% (CD34+CD38−). Even from single cells, independent of their distinct CD34/CD38 phenotype at sorting, we determined that 100% of single cells gave rise to progeny representing at least three subpopulations, and 79% of them even gave rise to all 4 subpopulations after 48 days in culture (Figure 2b). This result clearly shows that the expression of CD34 and CD38 is not stable over time, and since all starting cells irrespective of their marker profile give rise to all four subpopulations, also speaks against a linear hierarchy of cells depicted by these markers.

In order to determine the plasticity of marker expression in individual cells over time, we continuously observed single PDLTC-PH cells by time-lapse epifluorescence microscopy-based cell tracking for several days (Figure 2c), as previously described.¹⁴ This technology allows to measure surface marker up- or downregulation in living cells in real-time, using fluorescent antibodies against CD34 and CD38 at low concentrations in the culture medium,¹⁴ without losing individual cell identity. Pre-stained cells for CD34 and CD38 with fluorescent antibodies were continuously observed until their first division in vitro. And indeed, we found changes in marker expression—both onset of markers in originally negative cells and downregulation of marker-positive cells at single cell resolution within one cell generation (Figure 2c; Supplementary Figure S2; Supplementary Movies S1 to S3). In particular, the majority of double negative prospectively isolated PDLTC-PH cells upregulated CD34 and/or CD38 successively within one cell generation, although with various kinetics and intensities (Figure 2c). This clearly indicates a highly fluctuating and transient expression of both markers, which does not require cell division.

Do these results indicate that there is no distinction of cells with different LIC properties within the PDLTC, and that consequently every cell has LIC activity? Since we failed to use CD34/CD38 enrichments for LICs, we changed the strategy and grew subclones derived from single FACS-sorted PDLTC-PH cells of all four FACS quadrants, as described earlier. The tail vein transplantation of 5 × 10⁶ cells of individual subclones in sublethally irradiated NSG recipients clearly distinguished subclones, causing a fast progressing disease, whereas some subclones did not give rise to full blown leukemia at all within 155 days of observation (Figure 2d and Supplementary Figure S3). Importantly, all clonal cells homed and engrafted in the BM, even those that showed minimal BM outgrowth and no contribution to peripheral ALL cells (Figure 2d). These results again highlight the heterogeneity of individual ALL cells with variable ability to engraft and progress to leukemia in NSG mice and strongly propose the existence of LICs in BCP-ALL.

Is the, here described, plasticity of ALL cells restricted to the surface expression of some molecules, or do ALL cells change their molecular composition, functionality and even their identity over time? We need to find out whether this change is unidirectional and/or linear, following a differentiation path or whether some ALL cells may be able to dedifferentiate and switch between LICs and non-LICs. While in many tissues a hierarchical organization of cancer development is proposed, Ratajczak and coworkers reported similar fluctuating expression of potential cancer stem cell surface markers CD24 and CD44 in an ovarian cancer cell line.¹⁵ Our findings did not exclude the existence of a minor LIC population, which is uncovered due to the lack of respective markers. The clonal outgrowth and also the various leukemogenicity of established clonal subcultures highlight the fact that not every ALL cell has LIC potential. Only the use of CD34 and CD38 will not be sufficient to enrich for them.

The further analysis of this highly plastic ALL model, which revealed a non-hierarchical cellular development in ALL can be used to explore the properties of LICs in ALL, as the single clone system was capable to dissect between leukemogenic and non-leukemogenic single cells. These analyses are pivotal to find proper markers for LIC identification in ALL, which is a prerequisite for the development of novel LIC-directed therapies. These novel strategies are urgently needed in order to improve long-term outcome and survival in ALL patients.

Figure 1View larger versionFigure 1. PDLTC-PH contains cells with leukemia-initiating potential in vivo. (a) Xenograft transplantation of PDLTC-PH cells. Survival and leukemic peripheral blood engraftment of NSG mice (n=7) receiving bulk PDLTC-PH cells. (b) Surface CD34 and CD38 expression of PDLTC-PH cells via FACS. (c) Xenograft transplantation of prospectively FACS-enriched PDLTC-PH subpopulations. Survival of transplanted NSG mice (n=3 mice per subpopulation). No significant difference calculated by the log-rank test. The experiment was performed in a randomized and blinded way. One mouse of the CD34−CD38+ group died within the first week, caused by the transplantation procedure, and was excluded. The mean and s.d. are displayed.

Figure 2View larger versionFigure 2. Plasticity in CD34 and CD38 expression counteracts a prospective enrichment of existing LIC clones. (a) Experimental scheme and FACS results of marker expression after prospective enrichment of subpopulations upon a 90-day-culture. (b) Experimental scheme and FACS results of marker expression of subclones after 48 days in culture. Hundred single-cell-derived subclones obtained via single cell FACS sort of cells from all four subpopulations were grown and the marker profile was analyzed via FACS. All clones consisted of at least three subpopulations of cells after 48 days in culture. (c) Experimental scheme and continuous microscopy-based tracking of marker expression at single cell level. Fifty single cells of all four subpopulations were observed until the mother cell divided. High proportion of marker reversion was found especially in CD34−CD38− cells. (d) Xenotransplantation of seven PDLTC-PH subclones. Survival of NSG mice receiving individual subclones (n=3 mice per subclone). Only clone 1 and 2 resulted in early leukemic death of recipients, all other mice survived the observation period of 155 days. Significant difference calculated by the log-rank test. Leukemic engraftment in recipient mice that survived 155 days of observation. The mean and s.d. are displayed.

Acknowledgments

We thank C Jourdan and A Vogel for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the LOEWE Center for Cell and Gene Therapy Frankfurt, Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst (III L 4- 518/17.004 (2014)), the EUTOS funding program and the Deutsche José Carreras Leukämie Stiftung (to OGO and MAR). FL receives support from the Frankfurter Förderung ‘Nachwuchswissenschaftler' of the Goethe University. BW was supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Leukemia website (http://www.nature.com/leu)

FL and OGO had advisory roles for Novartis, Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi Aventis. FL received funding of Novartis. OGO was funded by Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

Open In Web Browser

Articles from are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

PMC Copyright Notice

The articles available from the PMC site are protected by copyright, even though access is free. Copyright is held by the respective authors or publishers who provide these articles to PMC. Users of PMC are responsible for complying with the terms and conditions defined by the copyright holder.

Users should assume that standard copyright protection applies to articles in PMC, unless an article contains an explicit license statement that gives a user additional reuse or redistribution rights. PMC does not allow automated/bulk downloading of articles that have standard copyright protection.

See the copyright notice on the PMC site, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/copyright/, for further details and specific exceptions.

References

Goekbuget N, Hoelzer D. Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin Hematol 2009; 46: 64–75.19100369

Bassan R, Hoelzer D. Modern therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 532–543.21220592

Ottmann OG, Pfeifer H. First-line treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in adults. Curr Opin Oncol 2009; 21: S43–S46.19561414

Lang F, Wojcik B, Rieger MA. Stem Cell hierarchy and clonal evolution in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Stem Cells Int 2015; 2015: 137164.26236346

Lapidot T, Sirard C, Vormoor J, Murdoch B, Hoang T, Caceres-Cortes J et al. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 1994; 367: 645–648.7509044

Blair A, Hogge DE, Ailles LE, Lansdorp PM, Sutherland HJ. Lack of expression of Thy-1 (CD90) on acute myeloid leukemia cells with long-term proliferative ability in vitro and in vivo. Blood 1997; 89: 3104–3112.9129012

Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 1997; 3: 730–737.9212098

Zhang H, Li S. Molecular mechanisms for survival regulation of chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Protein Cell 2013; 4: 186–196.23483480

Cobaleda C, Gutiérrez-Cianca N, Pérez-Losada J, Flores T, García-Sanz R, González M et al. A primitive hematopoietic cell is the target for the leukemic transformation in human philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2000; 95: 1007–1013.10648416

Kong Y, Yoshida S, Saito Y, Doi T, Nagatoshi Y, Fukata M et al. CD34+CD38+CD19+ as well as CD34+CD38-CD19+ cells are leukemia-initiating cells with self-renewal capacity in human B-precursor ALL. Leukemia 2008; 22: 1207–1213.18418410

le Viseur C, Hotfilder M, Bomken S, Wilson K, Röttgers S, Schrauder A et al. In childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, blasts at different stages of immunophenotypic maturation have stem cell properties. Cancer Cell 2008; 14: 47–58.18598943

Aoki Y, Watanabe T, Saito Y, Kuroki Y, Hijikata A, Takagi M et al. Identification of CD34+ and CD34- leukemia-initiating cells in MLL-rearranged human acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2015; 125: 967–980.25538041

Nijmeijer BA, Szuhai K, Goselink HM, van Schie MLJ, van der Burg M, de Jong D et al. Long-term culture of primary human lymphoblastic leukemia cells in the absence of serum or hematopoietic growth factors. Exp Hematol 2009; 37: 376–385.19135770

Thalheimer FB, Wingert S, De Giacomo P, Haetscher N, Rehage M, Brill B et al. Cytokine-regulated GADD45G induces differentiation and lineage selection in hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 2014; 3: 34–43.

Gunjal P, Pedziwiatr D, Ismail Aa, Kakar SS, Ratajczak MZ. An emerging question about putative cancer stem cells in established cell lines—are they true stem cells or a fluctuating cell phenotype? J Cancer Stem Cell Res 2015; 3: e1004.26925434

[Back]

Figure 1.

PDLTC-PH contains cells with leukemia-initiating potential in vivo. (a) Xenograft transplantation of PDLTC-PH cells. Survival and leukemic peripheral blood engraftment of NSG mice (n=7) receiving bulk PDLTC-PH cells. (b) Surface CD34 and CD38 expression of PDLTC-PH cells via FACS. (c) Xenograft transplantation of prospectively FACS-enriched PDLTC-PH subpopulations. Survival of transplanted NSG mice (n=3 mice per subpopulation). No significant difference calculated by the log-rank test. The experiment was performed in a randomized and blinded way. One mouse of the CD34−CD38+ group died within the first week, caused by the transplantation procedure, and was excluded. The mean and s.d. are displayed.

[Back]

[Back]

Figure 2.

Plasticity in CD34 and CD38 expression counteracts a prospective enrichment of existing LIC clones. (a) Experimental scheme and FACS results of marker expression after prospective enrichment of subpopulations upon a 90-day-culture. (b) Experimental scheme and FACS results of marker expression of subclones after 48 days in culture. Hundred single-cell-derived subclones obtained via single cell FACS sort of cells from all four subpopulations were grown and the marker profile was analyzed via FACS. All clones consisted of at least three subpopulations of cells after 48 days in culture. (c) Experimental scheme and continuous microscopy-based tracking of marker expression at single cell level. Fifty single cells of all four subpopulations were observed until the mother cell divided. High proportion of marker reversion was found especially in CD34−CD38− cells. (d) Xenotransplantation of seven PDLTC-PH subclones. Survival of NSG mice receiving individual subclones (n=3 mice per subclone). Only clone 1 and 2 resulted in early leukemic death of recipients, all other mice survived the observation period of 155 days. Significant difference calculated by the log-rank test. Leukemic engraftment in recipient mice that survived 155 days of observation. The mean and s.d. are displayed.

[Back]