International Journal of Legal Medicine

Int J Legal Med. 132(3): 831-842

Species identification of adult African blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of forensic importance

Lena Lutz

lena@die-lutzens.de

¹, Kirstin A. Williams

kirstin.williams@durban.gov.za

²³, Martin H. Villet

M.Villet@ru.ac.za

³, Mfon Ekanem

mfoneka2004@yahoo.com

⁴, Krzysztof Szpila

szpila@umk.pl

⁵

1. 0000 0004 1936 9721grid.7839.5Institute of Forensic Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Kennedyallee 104, D-60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

2. Entomology Department, Durban Natural Science Museum, Durban, South Africa

3. grid.91354.3aSouthern African Forensic Entomology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa

4. 0000 0000 9156 2260grid.412960.8Department of Zoology, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria

5. 0000 0001 0943 6490grid.5374.5Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland

© The Author(s) 2017

DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1654-y

Published online: 28 August 2017

Published in print: 2018

Abstract

Necrophagous blowflies can provide an excellent source of evidence for forensic entomologists and are also relevant to problems in public health, medicine, and animal health. However, access to useful information about these blowflies is constrained by the need to correctly identify the flies, and the poor availability of reliable, accessible identification tools is a serious obstacle to the development of forensic entomology in the majority of African countries. In response to this need, a high-quality key to the adults of all species of forensically relevant blowflies of Africa has been prepared, drawing on high-quality entomological materials and modern focus-stacking photomicroscopy. This new key can be easily applied by investigators inexperienced in the taxonomy of blowflies and is made available through a highly accessible online platform. Problematic diagnostic characters used in previous keys are discussed.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1654-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

The correct identification of necrophagous blowflies is pivotal to their use as evidence in forensic entomology [1] and is also central to addressing the problems that these flies pose for public health, medicine, and animal health [2, 3]. Although superficially similar in appearance, the various species differ in their developmental biology, ecology, and behaviour and may variously be pests in meat and fish markets [4], causes of human and animal myiasis [3], or carriers of microbial pathogens [4, 5]. Correct identifications provide access to relevant information about these blowflies, especially the crucial studies of development [1].

Africa is home to over a dozen species of necrophagous blowflies, several of which are found on other continents too [1, 6]. The blowflies (family Calliphoridae) in their traditional, broad taxonomic concept were postulated to be a paraphyletic taxon [7], which was confirmed by subsequent molecular studies [8–11]. All species of forensically important blowflies are grouped in four subfamilies in the sense of the classification proposed by Rognes [7, 12]. Necrophagous blowfly faunas have been intensively studied in Australasia, Europe, East and South Asia, Middle East, and North and South America, resulting in a variety of published checklists, keys, and taxonomic monographs [12–22].

However, the blowfly faunas of some large geographical regions, like the Afrotropics (except for Namibia and the Republic of South Africa), remain poorly studied [3, 23, 24]. Except for the genus Chrysomya, keys, if available, do not cover the fauna of the whole continent and often are poorly illustrated [23–25]. This situation hampers the broad application of insects for medico-legal purposes due to a lack of proper tools for species identification in some African countries. Additionally, there is a widespread lack of access to printed material in Africa, but the high penetration of internet-enabled mobile phone technology in Africa is making access to Health and open-access electronic media an increasingly practical alternative [26, 27].

The aim of the present paper is to deliver a high quality, open-access key for identification of the adults of all species of forensically relevant blowflies known from Africa. The main intention was to prepare a species identification tool that will be easily applicable to investigators inexperienced in blowfly taxonomy. This task was achieved thanks to the application of modern focus-stacking photomicroscopy [28, 29] and the use of suitably preserved entomological material. The authors hope that this publication will be a further milestone toward advancing the application of forensic entomology in African countries.

Material and methods

The key contains 15 species verified as necrophagous and one obligately parasitic species (Chrysomya bezziana, Old World screwworm) and includes nomenclatural synonyms that are important in accessing relevant biological literature. Most of the specimens used to illustrate characters were collected personally by the authors. Specimens of Chrysomya inclinata, Chrysomya laxifrons, Chrysomya chloropyga, and Lucilia infernalis were collected by Dr. Amnon Freidberg (Tel Aviv University) during field trips to Kenya and Malawi. An additional large series of specimens of Ch. chloropyga was donated by Dr. Marise Heyns (University of Cape Town). Specimens of Ch. bezziana were provided by Dr. April H. Wardhana (IRCVC, Indonesia).

The preparation of image-stacking was done using an M205C Leica Stereomicroscope with an integrated high-resolution Leica DFC495 digital camera and associated software (Leica Application Suite 4.4.0). For the compilation of final pictures, 30–35 images were stacked. Characters used in the key were mostly compiled from Zumpt [23], Rognes [12, 16], Wallman [18], Rognes and Paterson [30], Kurahashi and Kirk-Spriggs [24], Szpila [31], Irish et al. [25], Williams and Villet [32], and Akbarzadeh et al. [22]. The terminology follows Rognes [12], and all morphological details were clearly marked and abbreviated on the figures.

Distributional data were restricted to the African mainland and follow Zumpt [23], Pont [6], Erzinçlioğlu [33], Verves [19, 34], Ekanem and Dike [35], Irish et al. [25; text, not maps], and Taleb et al. [36]. Many locality records reported in the listed references need verification and should be treated with caution. Former records referring to Sudan were not revised into Sudan and South Sudan, because detailed verification of the collection sites was not generally possible. New distribution records for some species for specific countries resulted from the inspection of collections by the authors (KwaZulu-Natal Museum [Durban], National Museum [Bloemfontein], Iziko Museum—South Africa [Cape Town], Natural History Museum of Denmark [Copenhagen]). These new records are indicated in the key by underlining the names of the countries concerned.

Results

Key to the African blowflies of forensic importance

Stem vein of wing without row of hairs on dorsal surface, greater ampulla without stiff, erect hairs (Fig. 1e) ........................................................................................ 2.

Stem vein of wing with row of hairs on dorsal surface (Fig. 1a), greater ampulla with stiff, erect hairs (Fig. 1d) ........................................................................................ 3.

Fig. 1View larger versionFig. 1. Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a Ch. albiceps, basal part of wing, stem vein. b C. vicina, thorax, upper and lower calypters. c L. sericata, thorax, upper and lower calypters. d Ch. albiceps, thorax, lateral view. e L. sericata, thorax, lateral view. f Ch. megacephala, male, head, fronto-lateral view, arrow points at demarcation line between small and large eye facets. g Ch. megacephala, male, head, frontal view, arrow points at demarcation line between small and large eye facets. h Ch. megacephala female, head, frontal view. i Ch. bezziana, male, head, fronto-lateral view. j Ch. bezziana, male, head, frontal view. k Ch. bezziana, female, head, frontal view. ant spir anterior spiracle, fop fronto-orbital plate, gr amp greater ampulla, kat ter katatergite, low cal lower calypter, post spir posterior spiracle

2. Lower calypter dark with hairs on dorsal surface (Fig. 1b), thorax non-metallic, dark, and dusted (Figs. 1b, 4a–c); coxopleural streak absent (Fig. 3i); abdomen dark metallic blue, rarely dark green, or olive-green (Fig. 4a–c) ...................................................................................... 10.

Lower calypter bright white or yellowish, sometimes blackened posteriorly (in L. infernalis), always without hairs on dorsal surface (Fig. 1c); thorax metallic green, bluish or coppery (Fig. 5d-h); coxopleural streak present (Fig. 3j); abdomen bright metallic green, blue to coppery (Fig. 5d-h) ...................................................................... 12.

3. Anterior spiracle blackish brown (Figs. 1e, 3b, 4e, 5b) ........................................................................................ 4.

Anterior spiracle white or yellowish (Figs. 1d, 2h, i, 4f–h, 5a, c) .............................................................................. 5.

4. Eyes of male touching and with sharply demarcated and strikingly large upper facets (Fig. 1f, g); frons of female with fronto-orbital plate dark (Fig. 1h); lower calypter brownish with dark rim (Fig. 5b) .......................................................... Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794)

Distribution: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, DR Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Eyes of male close but not touching and without demarcation between dorsal and ventral facets (Fig. 1i, j); frons of female with fronto-orbital plate reddish (Fig. 1k); lower calypter uniformly white (Fig. 4e) ..................... Chrysomya bezziana (Villeneuve, 1914)

Distribution: Algeria, Cameroon, Chad, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

5. Anterior wing veins and membrane black or strongly infuscated (Fig. 2e) ........................................................ 6.

Anterior wing margin hyaline; if weakly darkened (some specimens of Ch. putoria), then ground colour of face and genal dilation dark (Fig. 2i) ........................................... 8.

6. Eyes of male with sharply demarcated and strikingly large upper facets (Fig. 2d); fronto-orbital plate of female totally orange (Fig. 2a) ............................................................................ Chrysomya marginalis (Wiedemann, 1830) [=Ch. regalis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830]

Distribution: Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Egypt, DR Congo, Kenya, Mali, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Zimbabwe.

Eyes of male without demarcation between dorsal and ventral facets; fronto-orbital plate in female dark at least in upper part (Fig. 2b, c) ................................................ 7.

7. Eyes of male widely separated, frons at its narrowest point measuring 0.5 or more times eye width; frons of female subparallel, fronto-orbital plate with upper part black and lower part bright, reddish (Fig. 2b) ............................................................... Chrysomya laxifrons (Villeneuve, 1914)

Distribution: Cameroon, Central African Republic, DR Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Namibia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zimbabwe.

Eyes of male touching (like on Fig. 2d); frons of female conspicuously narrowed on lower half, fronto-orbital plate entirely black (Fig. 2c) ........................................ ................................ Chrysomya inclinata (Walker, 1861)

Distribution: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, DR Congo, Eritrea, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo, Zimbabwe.

8. Dorsal surface of thorax shining green with little, evenly distributed dusting; gena reddish-yellowish in ground colour (Fig. 2h); lower calypter white (Figs. 1d, 4d); outer vertical seta of male well-developed (Fig. 2f) ....................................... Chrysomya albiceps (Wiedemann, 1819)

Distribution: Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, DR Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Western Sahara, Zambia, Zimbabwe. The most common necrophagous blowfly in Africa.

Dorsal surface of thorax with conspicuous whitish dusting, forming characteristic patterns of dusted and undusted surfaces (Fig. 2j, k); gena dark in ground colour (Fig. 2i); lower calypter darker (Figs. 4f, 5c); outer vertical seta of male absent (Fig. 2g) .................................... 9.

9. Presutural area of thorax with conspicuous black L-shaped marking on each side of midline, strongly white-dusted median vitta proceeding forwards from suture to front of thorax (Fig. 2j); abdomen with last two segments shiny brassy/green and contrasting strongly with bluish anterior segments (Fig. 2l) ......................................... .................... Chrysomya chloropyga (Wiedemann, 1818)

Distribution: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, DR Congo, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Presutural area of thorax without conspicuous paired L-shaped markings, but with vague lateral dark spots, white-dusted median vitta extending forwards hardly halfway to front of thorax (Fig. 2k); abdomen with last two segments concolourous with green/bluish anterior segments (Fig. 2m) ................................................................... Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann, 1830)

Distribution: Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, DR Congo, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

10. Anterior part of genal dilation yellow to orange (Fig. 3a); basicosta bright to dark yellow ........................................................ Calliphora vicina (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) [=C. erythrocephala (Meigen, 1826)]

Distribution: Algeria, Egypt, Morocco , South Africa. Possibly occur in all countries of North Africa.

Anterior part of genal dilation uniformly black (Fig. 3b, c); basicosta brownish-black ........................................11.

11. Hairs on genal dilation and postgena orange (Fig. 3b), anterior spiracle brownish-black (Fig. 3b) ................... Calliphora vomitoria (Linnaeus, 1758)

Distribution: Morocco. Erzinçlioğlu (1987) gives general information “North Africa”. Probably distributed in mountainous areas of North Africa.

Hairs on genal dilation and postgena predominantly black (Fig. 3c); anterior spiracle dark yellow (Fig. 3c) .......................... Calliphora croceipalpis Jaennicke, 1867

Distribution: DR Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe. Widespread from East to South Africa [6].

12. Katatergite (small pleurite on lateral surface of thorax, situated above posterior spiracle, see Fig. 1b) bare or pubescent, without long, erect hairs ............................13.

Katatergite with long, fine, erect hairs (Fig. 3d) ...........15.

13. Wing deeply infuscated along anterior margin (Figs. 2e, 5e); subcostal sclerite with one or more black setulae (Fig. 3e) ................. Lucilia infernalis Villeneuve, 1914

Distribution: Burundi, Cameroon, Congo, DR Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Liberia, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, Tanzania, Togo, Zimbabwe. Rare species but probably distributed over the whole rain forest area of Africa [23].

Wing transparent (Fig. 5d, f); hairs on subcostal sclerite only pubescent (Fig. 3f) .............................................. 14.

14. Metasternal area (sclerite midventrally between middle and hind coxae) setose; posterior slope of humeral callus with 6–8 hairs (Fig. 3m); surface of notopleuron between last notopleural seta and edge of notopleuron with 8–16 hairs (Fig. 3m); central occipital area with 2–8 setulae below each inner vertical seta (Fig. 3g) .................................................................. Lucilia sericata (Meigen, 1826)

Distribution: Algeria, Egypt, Lesotho, Libya, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe. Possible occurrence in all countries of the North Africa.

Metasternal area bare; posterior slope of humeral callus with 0–4 hairs (Fig. 3n); surface of notopleuron between last notopleural seta and edge of notopleuron with only 2–5 hairs (Fig. 3n); central occipital area with one setula (rarely 0 or 2) below each inner vertical seta (Fig. 3h) ....................................................... Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann, 1830)

Distribution: Botswana, Cameroon, DR Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda, Senegal, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zimbabwe. Widespread in the Afrotropical Region [24].

15. Third antennal segment bright orange (Fig. 3l); eyes in male almost touching ............................................................................ Hemipyrellia pulchra (Wiedemann, 1830)

Distribution: Egypt, Mozambique, Nigeria, Sudan. Widespread West to East Africa [6].

Third antennal segment dark (Fig. 3k); in male head sub-holoptic with eyes broadly separated (Fig. 3k) ..................... Hemipyrellia fernandica (Macquart, 1855)

Distribution: Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria,? Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Zimbabwe. Widespread in the Afrotropical Region [24].

Fig. 2View larger versionFig. 2. Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a Ch. marginalis, female, head, frontal view. b Ch. laxifrons, female, head, frontal view. c Ch. inclinata, female, head, frontal view. d Ch. marginalis, male, head, frontal view. e L. infernalis, wing. f Ch. albiceps, male, head, top of frons. g Ch. putoria, male, head, top of frons. h Ch. albiceps, head, lateral view. i Ch. chloropyga, head, lateral view. j Ch. chloropyga, thorax, dorsal view. k Ch. putoria, thorax, dorsal view. l Ch. chloropyga, abdomen, dorsal view. m Ch. putoria, abdomen, dorsal view. ew eye width, fop fronto-orbital plate, frw frons width, gen dil genal dilation, ps g post gena

Fig. 3View larger versionFig. 3. Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a C. vicina, head, lateral view. b C. vomitoria, head, lateral view. c C. croceipalpis, head, lateral view. d H. fernandica, thorax, posterior part, lateral view. e L. infernalis, thorax, base of wing, lateral view. f L. sericata, thorax, base of wing, lateral view. g L. sericata, head, posterior view. h L. cuprina, head, posterior view. i C. vicina, thorax, posterior part, lateral view. j L. sericata, thorax, posterior part, lateral view. k H. fernandica, head, anterior view. l H. pulchra, head, antennae. m L. sericata, thorax, dorsal view. n L. cuprina, thorax, dorsal view. ant spir anterior spiracle, bas basicosta, cox str coxopleural streak, gen dil genal dilation, III ant third antennal segment, in ver inner vertical seta, h cal humeral callus, kat ter katatergite, ntl notopleuron, ps g post gena, post spir posterior spiracle, sub scl subcostal sclerite

Fig. 4View larger versionFig. 4. Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a C. croceipalpis. b C. vicina. c C. vomitoria. d Ch. albiceps. e Ch. bezziana. f Ch. chloropyga. g Ch. inclinata. h Ch. laxifrons. Scale bar 1 mm

Fig. 5View larger versionFig. 5. Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a Ch. marginalis. b Ch. megacephala. c Ch. putoria. d L. cuprina. e L. infernalis. f L. sericata. g H. fernandica. h H. pulchra. Scale bar 1 mm

Discussion

The list of species of forensic importance was prepared for regions with well-studied faunas, usually based on information from human forensic cases or ecological succession studies of large-bodied carrion [1, 37, 38]. Szpila and Villet [39] proposed a list of ten common necrophagous blowflies which may be found on human corpses across the continent, and which they stated should be extended to include additional widespread species. The present paper expands this list by five other necrophagous species (Ch. inclinata, Ch. laxifrons, L. infernalis, H. pulchra, H. fernandica) and one obligate parasite of vertebrates (Ch. bezziana) that might affect some forensic cases.1 *

Studies on regional African necrophagous faunas are scarce [1, 38] and mostly concern South Africa [40–48], Egypt [49–52], and Nigeria [35, 53, 54], with a few from Zimbabwe [55], Cameroon [56], and Algeria [36]. Of course, the African blowfly fauna still needs more faunistic studies, but the presented key should be successfully applicable in most continental African countries, especially in anthropogenic habitats.

The morphology and taxonomy of adult forms of common necrophagous blowflies is relatively well known, both worldwide and for African species [1, 3, 23–25, 30, 32]. However, consolidation of these data into one key revealed a few problems in designing couplets for some closely related species. The most familiar is the identification of L. cuprina and L. sericata and their possible hybrids, which has fortunately been deeply studied [32, 57–59], especially for African populations. As a result, a relatively broad set of morphological characters for the separation of both species was presented [32].

Calliphora croceipalpis and C. vicina have never been put together in one key dedicated to adult forms [3, 23, 24]. The latter species is considered introduced and invasive in South Africa [1, 6, 60] and, as a relatively new element of the Afrotropical fauna, was not included in Zumpt’s regional taxonomic monograph [23], although both are discussed in his myiasis monograph [3].

The darkened anterior wing margin in Chrysomya may also be confusing. In Ch. inclinata, Ch. laxifrons, and Ch. marginalis, the black veins and membrane of the margin of mature adults are obvious, easily observed, and quickly separate these species from other members of the genus, which lack pigment or, in some specimens of Ch. putoria (‘f. taeniata Bigot’ sensu Zumpt [3, 23]), have more-or-less darkened (but not black) veins. Both immature and partially teneral adults of the three species of the black-edged group may be only darkened, and in this case, distinction is made by checking the ground colour of the face and genal dilation (bright yellowish-orange in Ch. inclinata, Ch. laxifrons, and Ch. marginalis, and dark in Ch. putoria). It is important to mention that two rare East African montane species with a darkened anterior wing margin are not included in the present key: it is likely but not yet certain that Ch. polymita (Villeneuve 1914) and Ch. vanemdeni (Zumpt 1953) breed in carrion [23]; both possess a large, dark glossy spot on the genal dilation [25, 30]. They are characterised by Zumpt [23] and illustrated by Irish et al. [25].

Published information about the distribution of individual species of necrophagous blowflies in particular African countries is often confusing. Most of these species are widespread on the continent, and the Catalogue of the Diptera of the Afrotropical Region [6] provided data that are often restricted to comments like e.g., “widespread E. Afr. to sthn Afr.” (C. croceipalpis), “… widespread Afrotrop. Reg.” (H. fernandica), or “… widespread mainland Afrotropical Region” (L. infernalis). On the other hand, Verves [34] published very detailed lists of African countries for distribution of five species (Ch. albiceps, Ch. chloropyga, Ch. megacephala, L. infernalis, and H. fernandica) without any mention of the source of this information (and before Rognes and Paterson clarified the independence of Ch. chloropyga and Ch. putoria [30]). Additionally, in Irish et al. [25], information about the distribution of Ch. albiceps, Ch. chloropyga, and Ch. marginalis is mismatched between the text and maps. Contrary to the text information, Madagascar and Egypt are omitted on the maps for Ch. albiceps and Ch. marginalis, respectively, and Egypt is additionally marked on the map for Ch. chloropyga. Fortunately, these cases are easy to clarify, and it is clear that the distribution description in the text is congruent with the existing distributional data [6, 34]. Generally, these problems indicate a strong need for studies of local fauna profiled toward species of forensic importance in most African countries.

This key will assist entomologists on the African continent to use flies in forensic cases and push forward the use of forensic entomology in Africa, as well as the fields of public health and human and veterinary medicine. Further taxonomic research should focus on the alternative morphological methods of identification of adult flies [61, 62] and identification of preimaginal instars, as it is systematically implemented on other continents [63, 64]. This will facilitate large-scale research on spatial and seasonal distribution of forensically important flies in different African countries that is crucial for future forensic work.

Supplementary Material

Open In Web Browser

Footnotes

1. *Forensic cases in Africa and Asia include murders, neglect, and poaching. Adult screwworms that visit wounds, if only to feed, may be collected by death investigators. Cases of criminal neglect and poaching are not always immediately lethal, and adult screwworms might be recovered from cases involving live or dead humans and other animals.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1654-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Amnon Freidberg (Tel-Aviv University), Dr. Marise Heyns (University of Cape Town), and Dr. April Wardhana (IRCVC) are thankful for the donation of the material. KS was supported by a project of the Polish National Science Centre (2015/17/B/NZ8/02453).

Articles from are provided here courtesy of Springer

PMC Copyright Notice

The articles available from the PMC site are protected by copyright, even though access is free. Copyright is held by the respective authors or publishers who provide these articles to PMC. Users of PMC are responsible for complying with the terms and conditions defined by the copyright holder.

Users should assume that standard copyright protection applies to articles in PMC, unless an article contains an explicit license statement that gives a user additional reuse or redistribution rights. PMC does not allow automated/bulk downloading of articles that have standard copyright protection.

See the copyright notice on the PMC site, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/copyright/, for further details and specific exceptions.

References

Villet MH, author; Tomberlin JK, Benbow ME, editors. History, accomplishments, and challenges of forensic entomology in Africa. International dimensions and Frontiers in forensic entomology. 2015. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; p. 161–171

Norris KR, author. The bionomics of blow flies. Annu Rev Entomol. 1965;10:47–68. [Cross Ref]

Zumpt F, author. Myiasis in man and animals in the old world: a textbook for physicians, veterinarians and zoologists. 1965. London: Butterworths;

Graczyk TK, Knight R, Gilman RH, Cranfield MR, authors. The role of non-biting flies in the epidemiology of human infectious diseases. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:231–235. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Brits D, Brooks M, Villet MH, authors. Diversity of bacteria isolated from the flies Musca domestica (Muscidae) and Chrysomya megacephala (Calliphoridae) with emphasis on vectored pathogens. Afr Entomol. 2016;24:365–375. [Cross Ref]

Pont A, author; Crosskey RW, editor. 90. Family Calliphoridae. Catalogue of the Diptera of the Afrotropical region. 1980. London: British Museum (Natural History); p. 779–800

Rognes K, author. The Calliphoridae (blowflies) (Diptera: Oestroidea) are not a monophyletic group. Cladistics. 1997;13:27–66. [Cross Ref]

Kutty SN, Pape T, Wiegmann BM, Meier R, authors. Molecular phylogeny of the Calyptratae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha) with an emphasis on the superfamily Oestroidea and the position of Mystacinobiidae and McAlpine’s Fly. Syst Entomol. 2010;35:614–635. [Cross Ref]

Marinho MAT, Junqueira ACM, Paulo DF, Esposito MC, Villet MH, Azaredo-Espin AML, authors. Molecular phylogenetics of Oestroidea (Diptera; Calyptratae) with emphasis on Calliphoridae: insights into the inter-familiar relationships and additional evidence for paraphyly among blowflies. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;65:840–854. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Nelson LA, Lambkin CL, Batterham P, Wallman J, Dowton M, Whiting MF, Yeates DK, Cameron SL, authors. Beyond barcoding: a mitochondrial genomics approach to molecular phylogenetics and diagnostic of blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Gene. 2012;511:131–142. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Singh B, Wells JD, authors. Molecular systematics of the Calliphoridae (Diptera: Oestroidea): evidence from one mitochondrial and three nuclear genes. J Med Entomol. 2013;50:15–23. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Rognes K, author. Blowflies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica. 1991. Leiden-New York-København-Köln: Brill;

Kano R, Shinonaga S, authors. Calliphoridae (Insecta: Diptera). Tokyo Fauna Japonica. 1968. Tokyo: Biogeographical Society of Japan;

Kurahashi H, author. The blow flies of the New Guinea, Bismarck Archipelago and Bougainville Island. 1987. Tokyo: Entomological Society of Japan;

Kurahashi H, Benjaphong N, Omar B, authors. Blow flies (Insecta: Diptera: Calliphoridae) of Malaysia and Singapore. 1997. School of Biological Sciences: University of Singapore;

Rognes K (2002) Blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of Israel and adjacent areas, including a new species from Tunisia. Entomologica Scandinavica suppl 59:1–148

Fan Z, Zhizi C, Jianming F, Shensheng Z, Zhenliang T, authors. Diptera: Calliphoridae. Fauna Sinica, Insecta. 1997. Beijing: Science Press;

Wallman JF, author. A key to the adults of species of blowflies in southern Australia known or suspected to breed in carrion [corrigendum in Med Vet Entomol 16: 223]. Med Vet Entomol. 2001;15:433–437. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Verves YG, author. A catalogue of Oriental Calliphoridae (Diptera). Dipterological Res. 2005;16:223–310

Whitworth T, author. Keys to the genera and species of blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of America north of Mexico. Proc Entomol Soc Wash. 2006;108:689–725

Yang S-T, Kurahashi H, Shiao S-F, authors. Keys to the blow flies of Taiwan, with a checklist of recorded species and the description of a new species of Paradichosia Senior-White (Diptera, Calliphoridae). ZooKeys. 2014;434:57–109. [Cross Ref]

Akbarzadeh K, Wallman J, Sulakova H, Szpila K, authors. Species identification of Middle Eastern blowflies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) of forensic importance. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:1463–1472. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Zumpt F (1956) Calliphoridae (Diptera Cyclorrhapha). Part I: Calliphorini and Chrysomyiini. Exploration du Parc National Albert. Miss. G.F. de Witte (1933–1935), Fascicule 87, [iii] + 4–200 pp

Kurahashi H, Kirk-Spriggs A, authors. The Calliphoridae of Namibia (Diptera: Oestroidea). Zootaxa. 2006;1322:1–131

Irish S, Lindsay T, Wyatt N, authors. Key to adults of Afrotropical species of the genus Chrysomya Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Afr Entomol. 2014;22:297–306. [Cross Ref]

Aker JC, Mbiti IM, authors. Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. J Econ Perspectives. 2010;24:207–232. [Cross Ref]

Opoku D, Stephani V, Quentin W, authors. A realist review of mobile phone-based health interventions for non-communicable disease management in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Med. 2017;15:24 [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Johnson D, author. How to do everything: digital camera. 2008. 5. New York: McGraw-Hill Osborne Media;

Piper J, author; Hewitson TD, Darby IA, editors. Software-based stacking techniques to enhance depth of field and dynamic range in digital photomicrography. Histology protocols. 2010. Heidelberg: Springer; p. 193–210

Rognes K, Paterson HEH, authors. Chrysomya chloropyga (Wiedemann, 1818) and Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann, 1830) are two different species. Afr Entomol. 2005;13:49–70

Szpila K (2012) Key for identification of European and Mediterranean blowflies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) of medical and veterinary importance—adult flies. In: Gennard D (ed) Forensic entomology, an introduction, II edition. Willey-Blackwell, pp. 77–81 + plates 5.1–5.9

Williams KA, Villet MH, authors. Morphological identification of Lucilia sericata, Lucilia cuprina and their hybrids (Diptera, Calliphoridae). ZooKeys. 2014;420:69–85. [Cross Ref]

Erzinçlioğlu YZ, author. The larval instars of the African blowfly, Calliphora croceipalpis Jaennicke, with a key to the genera of the third instars of African carrion-breeding Calliphoridae (Diptera). Bull Entomol Res. 1987;77:575–580. [Cross Ref]

Verves YG, author. A preliminary list of species of Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of the Republic of Seychelles. Phelsuma. 2003;11:1–16

Ekanem MS, Dike MC, authors. Arthropod succession on pig carcasses in southeastern Nigeria. Pap Avulsos Zool. 2010;50:561–570

Taleb M, Tail G, Kara FZ, Djedouani B, Toumi M, authors. A preliminary study of the effects of environmental variables on early Diptera carrion colonizers in Algiers, Algeria. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2015;4:181–188

Szpila K, author; Amendt J, Goff ML, Campobasso CP, Grassberger M, editors. Key for the identification of third instars of European blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of forensic importance. Current concepts in forensic entomology. 2010. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer; p. 43–56

Villet MH, author. African carrion ecosystems and their insect communities in relation to forensic entomology. Pest Tech. 2011;5:1–15

Szpila K, Villet M, authors. Morphology and identification of first instars of African blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) commonly of forensic importance. J Med Entomol. 2011;48:738–752. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Prins AJ, author. Morphological and biological notes on six South African blow-flies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) and their immature stages. Ann S Afr Mus. 1982;90:201–217

Braack L, author. Arthropods associated with carcasses in the northern Kruger National Park. S Afr J wild Res. 1986;16:91–98

Braack L, author. Community dynamics of carrion-attendant arthropods in tropical African woodland. Oecologia. 1987;72:402–409. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Braack L, de Vos V, authors. Feeding habits and flight range of blow-flies (Chrysomya spp.) in relation to anthrax transmission in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1990;57:141–142. [PubMed]

Louw S, van der Linde TC, authors. Insects frequenting decomposing corpses in central South Africa. Afr Entomol. 1993;1:265–269

Williams KA (2003) Spatial and temporal occurrence of forensically important South African blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae). MSc thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa

Richards CS, Williams KA, Villet MH, authors. Predicting geographic distribution of seven blowfly species (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Africa. Afr Entomol. 2009;17:170–182. [Cross Ref]

Williams KA, Richards CS, Villet MH, authors. Predicting the geographic distribution of Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Africa. Afr Inverts. 2014;55:157–170. [Cross Ref]

Parry NJ, Mansell MW, Weldon CW, authors. Seasonal, locality, and habitat variation in assemblages of carrion-associated Diptera in Gauteng province, South Africa. J Med Entomol. 2016;53:1322–1329. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Hegazi EM, Shaaban MA, Sabry E, authors. Carrion insects of the Egyptian western desert. J Med Entomol. 1991;28:734–739. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Tantawi T, El-Kady EM, Greenberg B, El-Ghaffar HA, authors. Arthropod succession on exposed rabbit carrion in Alexandria, Egypt. J Med Entomol. 1996;33:566–580. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Abd El-bar MM, Sawaby RF, authors. A preliminary investigation of insect colonization and succession on remains of rabbits treated with an organophosphate insecticide in El-Qalyubiya Governorate of Egypt. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;208:e26–e30. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Aly SM, Wen J, Wang X, Cai J, Liu Q, Zhong M, authors. Identification of forensically important arthropods on exposed remains during summer season in northeastern Egypt. J Cent South Univ (Med Sci). 2013;38:1–6

Okiwelu SN, Ikpamii T, Umeozor OC, authors. Arthropods associated with mammalian carcasses in Rivers State, Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res. 2008;11:339–342

Ekanem MS, Usua EJ, authors. Immature stages and biology of two blowfly species (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Nig J Entomol. 2000;17:1–11

Mabika N, Masendu R, Mawera G, authors. An initial study of insect succession on decomposing rabbit carrions in Harare, Zimbabwe. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4:561–565. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Feugang Youmessi FD, de Coninck E, Bilong Bilong CF, Hubrecht F, Djiéto-Lordon C, Braet Y, Bourguignon L, authors. First records on five species of Calliphoridae (Diptera) reared from maggot collected on rat carrions corpse during a forensic entomology experiment in the campus of the University of Yaounde I-Cameroon. Int J Biosciences. 2012;2:75–80

Wallman JF, Leys R, Hogendoorn K, authors. Molecular systematic of Australian carrion-breeding blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) based on mitochondrial DNA. Invertebrate Syst. 2005;19:1–15. [Cross Ref]

Wells JD, Wall R, Stevens JR, authors. Phylogenetic analysis of forensically important Lucilia flies based on cytochrome oxidase I sequence: a cautionary tale for forensic species determination. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121:229–233. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Williams KA, Villet MH, authors. Ancient and modern hybridization between Lucilia sericata and L. cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Eur J Entomol. 2013;110:187–196. [Cross Ref]

Williams KA, Villet MH, authors. A new and earlier record of Chrysomya megacephala in South Africa, with notes on another exotic species, Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Afr Inverts. 2006;47:347–350

Grzywacz A, Ogiela J, Tofilski A, authors. Identification of Muscidae (Diptera) of medico-legal importance by means of wing measurements. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:1495–1504. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Sontigun N, Sukontason KL, Zajac B, Zehner R, Sukontason K, Wannasan A, Amendt J, authors. Wing morphometrics as a tool in species identification of forensically important blow flies of Thailand. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:229 [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

Martin-Vega D, Diaz-Aranda LM, Baz A, authors. The immature stages of the necrophagous fly Liopiophila varipes and considerations on the genus Liopiophila (Diptera: Piophilidae). Dtsch Entomol Z. 2014;61:37–42. [Cross Ref]

Grzywacz A, Hall MJR, Pape T, Szpila K, authors. Muscidae (Diptera) of forensic importance—an identification key to third instar larvae of the western Palaearctic region and a catalogue of the muscid carrion community. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131:855–866. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]

[Back]

Fig. 1.

Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a Ch. albiceps, basal part of wing, stem vein. b C. vicina, thorax, upper and lower calypters. c L. sericata, thorax, upper and lower calypters. d Ch. albiceps, thorax, lateral view. e L. sericata, thorax, lateral view. f Ch. megacephala, male, head, fronto-lateral view, arrow points at demarcation line between small and large eye facets. g Ch. megacephala, male, head, frontal view, arrow points at demarcation line between small and large eye facets. h Ch. megacephala female, head, frontal view. i Ch. bezziana, male, head, fronto-lateral view. j Ch. bezziana, male, head, frontal view. k Ch. bezziana, female, head, frontal view. ant spir anterior spiracle, fop fronto-orbital plate, gr amp greater ampulla, kat ter katatergite, low cal lower calypter, post spir posterior spiracle

[Back]

[Back]

Fig. 2.

Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a Ch. marginalis, female, head, frontal view. b Ch. laxifrons, female, head, frontal view. c Ch. inclinata, female, head, frontal view. d Ch. marginalis, male, head, frontal view. e L. infernalis, wing. f Ch. albiceps, male, head, top of frons. g Ch. putoria, male, head, top of frons. h Ch. albiceps, head, lateral view. i Ch. chloropyga, head, lateral view. j Ch. chloropyga, thorax, dorsal view. k Ch. putoria, thorax, dorsal view. l Ch. chloropyga, abdomen, dorsal view. m Ch. putoria, abdomen, dorsal view. ew eye width, fop fronto-orbital plate, frw frons width, gen dil genal dilation, ps g post gena

[Back]

[Back]

Fig. 3.

Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a C. vicina, head, lateral view. b C. vomitoria, head, lateral view. c C. croceipalpis, head, lateral view. d H. fernandica, thorax, posterior part, lateral view. e L. infernalis, thorax, base of wing, lateral view. f L. sericata, thorax, base of wing, lateral view. g L. sericata, head, posterior view. h L. cuprina, head, posterior view. i C. vicina, thorax, posterior part, lateral view. j L. sericata, thorax, posterior part, lateral view. k H. fernandica, head, anterior view. l H. pulchra, head, antennae. m L. sericata, thorax, dorsal view. n L. cuprina, thorax, dorsal view. ant spir anterior spiracle, bas basicosta, cox str coxopleural streak, gen dil genal dilation, III ant third antennal segment, in ver inner vertical seta, h cal humeral callus, kat ter katatergite, ntl notopleuron, ps g post gena, post spir posterior spiracle, sub scl subcostal sclerite

[Back]

[Back]

Fig. 4.

Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a C. croceipalpis. b C. vicina. c C. vomitoria. d Ch. albiceps. e Ch. bezziana. f Ch. chloropyga. g Ch. inclinata. h Ch. laxifrons. Scale bar 1 mm

[Back]

[Back]

Fig. 5.

Morphology of African blowflies of forensic importance. a Ch. marginalis. b Ch. megacephala. c Ch. putoria. d L. cuprina. e L. infernalis. f L. sericata. g H. fernandica. h H. pulchra. Scale bar 1 mm

[Back]