The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 3 of 18
Back to Result List

A model of human motor sequence learning explains facilitation and interference effects based on spike-timing dependent plasticity

  • The ability to learn sequential behaviors is a fundamental property of our brains. Yet a long stream of studies including recent experiments investigating motor sequence learning in adult human subjects have produced a number of puzzling and seemingly contradictory results. In particular, when subjects have to learn multiple action sequences, learning is sometimes impaired by proactive and retroactive interference effects. In other situations, however, learning is accelerated as reflected in facilitation and transfer effects. At present it is unclear what the underlying neural mechanism are that give rise to these diverse findings. Here we show that a recently developed recurrent neural network model readily reproduces this diverse set of findings. The self-organizing recurrent neural network (SORN) model is a network of recurrently connected threshold units that combines a simplified form of spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) with homeostatic plasticity mechanisms ensuring network stability, namely intrinsic plasticity (IP) and synaptic normalization (SN). When trained on sequence learning tasks modeled after recent experiments we find that it reproduces the full range of interference, facilitation, and transfer effects. We show how these effects are rooted in the network’s changing internal representation of the different sequences across learning and how they depend on an interaction of training schedule and task similarity. Furthermore, since learning in the model is based on fundamental neuronal plasticity mechanisms, the model reveals how these plasticity mechanisms are ultimately responsible for the network’s sequence learning abilities. In particular, we find that all three plasticity mechanisms are essential for the network to learn effective internal models of the different training sequences. This ability to form effective internal models is also the basis for the observed interference and facilitation effects. This suggests that STDP, IP, and SN may be the driving forces behind our ability to learn complex action sequences.
Metadaten
Author:Quan Wang, Constantin RothkopfORCiDGND, Jochen TrieschORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-439810
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005632
ISSN:1553-7358
ISSN:1553-734X
Pubmed Id:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28767646
Parent Title (English):PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher:Public Library of Science
Place of publication:San Francisco, Calif.
Contributor(s):Daniele Marinazzo
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2017/08/17
Date of first Publication:2017/08/02
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2017/08/17
Volume:13
Issue:(8): e1005632
Page Number:27
First Page:1
Last Page:27
Note:
Copyright: © 2017 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
HeBIS-PPN:421387408
Institutes:Physik / Physik
Wissenschaftliche Zentren und koordinierte Programme / Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS)
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds:Physik
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0