Gender and attitudes toward welfare state reform: Are women really social investment promoters?

  • This article contributes to the study of the demand side of welfare politics by investigating gender differences in social investment preferences systematically. Building on the different functions of social investment policies in creating, preserving, or mobilizing skills, we argue that women do not support social investment policies generally more strongly than men. Rather, women demand, in particular, policies to preserve their skills during career interruptions and help to mobilize their skills on the labour market. In a second analytical step, we examine women’s policy priorities if skill preservation and mobilization come at the expense of social compensation. We test our arguments for eight Western European countries with data from the INVEDUC survey. The confirmation of our arguments challenges a core assumption of the literatures on the social investment turn and women’s political realignment. We discuss the implication of our findings in the conclusion.
Metadaten
Author:Julian L. GarritzmannORCiDGND, Hanna Schwander
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-622139
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720978012
ISSN:1461-7269
Parent Title (English):Journal of European social policy
Publisher:Sage Publ.
Place of publication:London
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2021/03/22
Date of first Publication:2021/03/22
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2022/04/13
Tag:attitudes; gender; public opinion; social investment; welfare state reform
Volume:31
Issue:3
Page Number:14
First Page:253
Last Page:266
Note:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Hanna Schwander would like to thank the Swiss National Science Foundations for generous funding of the project ‘Disentangeling the gender vote gap – a refined analysis of womens political realignment’ (PZ00P1 161234). Julian L. Garritzmann received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Note:
Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.
HeBIS-PPN:49472224X
Institutes:Gesellschaftswissenschaften
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoDeutsches Urheberrecht