The visually estimated blood volume in scaled canisters based on a simulation study

  • Background: The most common technique used worldwide to quantify blood loss during an operation is the visual assessment by the attending intervention team. In every operating room you will find scaled suction canisters that collect fluids from the surgical field. This scaling is commonly used by clinicians for visual assessment of intraoperative blood loss. While many studies have been conducted to quantify and improve the inaccuracy of the visual estimation method, research has focused on the estimation of blood volume in surgical drapes. The question whether and how scaling of canisters correlates with actual blood loss and how accurately clinicians estimate blood loss in scaled canisters has not been the focus of research to date. Methods: A simulation study with four “bleeding” scenarios was conducted using expired whole blood donations. After diluting the blood donations with full electrolyte solution, the sample blood loss volume (SBL) was transferred into suction canisters. The study participants then had to estimate the blood loss in all four scenarios. The difference to the reference blood loss (RBL) per scenario was analyzed. Results: Fifty-three anesthetists participated in the study. The median estimated blood loss was 500 ml (IQR 300/1150) compared to the RBL median of 281.5 ml (IQR 210.0/1022.0). Overestimations up to 1233 ml were detected. Underestimations were also observed in the range of 138 ml. The visual estimate for canisters correlated moderately with RBL (Spearman’s rho: 0.818; p < 0.001). Results from univariate nonparametric confirmation statistics regarding visual estimation of canisters show that the deviation of the visual estimate of blood loss is significant (z = − 10.95, p < 0.001, n = 220). Participants’ experience level had no significant influence on VEBL (p = 0.402). Conclusion: The discrepancies between the visual estimate of canisters and the actual blood loss are enormous despite the given scales. Therefore, we do not recommend estimating the blood loss visually in scaled suction canisters. Colorimetric blood loss estimation could be a more accurate option.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Metadaten
Author:Lara Gerdessen, Vanessa NeefORCiDGND, Florian Jürgen RaimannORCiDGND, Kai ZacharowskiORCiDGND, Florian PiekarskiORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-637093
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01265-1
ISSN:1471-2253
Parent Title (English):BMC anesthesiology
Publisher:BioMed Central
Place of publication:[S.l.]
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2021/02/16
Date of first Publication:2021/02/16
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2022/11/08
Tag:Blood loss estimation; Patient blood management; Transfusion; Visual estimation
Volume:21
Issue:art. 54
Article Number:54
Page Number:8
First Page:1
Last Page:8
Note:
07 April 2021: Open Access funding note to be added to fulfill the contractual requirement of the Germany fully OA/Sweden fully OA agreement. The article has been updated.
Note:
The study was supported by internal Department of Anaesthesiology funding only. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Note:
The peer review history for this article is available at https://bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12871-021-01265-1/peer-review.
Note:
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Institutes:Medizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0