Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (2)
- Article (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- competition (1)
- efficiency (1)
- quiet life hypothesis (1)
- savings banks (1)
Non-standard errors
(2021)
In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in sample estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: non-standard errors. To study them, we let 164 teams test six hypotheses on the same sample. We find that non-standard errors are sizeable, on par with standard errors. Their size (i) co-varies only weakly with team merits, reproducibility, or peer rating, (ii) declines significantly after peer-feedback, and (iii) is underestimated by participants.
The "quiet life hypothesis (QLH)" posits that banks enjoy the advantages of market power in terms of foregone revenues or cost savings. We suggest a unified approach to measure competition and efficiency simultaneously to test this hypothesis. We estimate bank-specific Lerner indices as measures of competition and test if cost and profit efficiency are negatively related to market power in the case of German savings banks.We find that both market power and average revenues declined among these banks between 1996 and 2006. While we find clear evidence supporting the QLH, estimated effects of the QLH are small from an economical perspective.
BANK INSTABILITY SEEMINGLY COULD PUSH BORROWERS TO USE CROWDFUNDING AS A SOURCE OF EXTERNAL FINANCE. WE CONSTRUCT A NOVEL, HAND-COLLECTED DATA SET OF VENTURES' USES OF EQUITY CROWDFUNDING IN GERMANY, THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH BANKS, AND VARIOUS VENTURE TRAITS SINCE 2011. BY OBSERVING VENTUREBANK RELATIONSHIPS, WE CAN IDENTIFY IF VENTURES CONNECTED TO SHOCKED BANKS ARE MORE LIKELY TO USE CROWDFUNDING IN AN ATTEMPT TO SUBSTITUTE FOR CONTRACTING BANK CREDIT SUPPLY. OUR RESULTS SHOW THAT CROWDFUNDING IS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE LIKELY FOR NEW VENTURES THAT INTERACT WITH STRESSED BANKS. INNOVATIVE FUNDING SOURCES ARE THUS PARTICULARLY RELEVANT IN TIMES OF STRESS AMONG CONVENTIONAL FINANCIERS. BUT CROWDFUNDED VENTURES ARE GENERALLY ALSO MORE OPAQUE AND RISKY THAN NEW VENTURES THAT DO NOT USE CROWDFUNDING.
