Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (1)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Institute
- Medizin (1)
Background: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has been introduced to abstain from median sternotomy due to related comorbidities. The aim of this study is to report the long term results of three different MICS CABG strategies: Partial lower sternotomy (PLS), totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) and anterolateral thoracotomy (ALT). Moreover we aimed to compare these surgical approaches in terms of quality of pain and pain intensity.
Methods: From 1997 to 2006, 126 patients underwent MICS CABG surgeries in our department through different surgical approaches: 43 PLS, 63 TECAB and 20 ALT. Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups. There were 90 males (71.4%) and 36 (28.6%) females with a mean age of 62±11 years (Range 36 to 90).
Results: There was no in-hospital mortality. Conversion to minithoracotomy was necessary in 2 (1.6%) patients and conversion to sternotomy was performed in 1 (0.8%) patient. Length of hospital stay was comparable in patients who underwent PLS or TECAB, but both groups had significantly shorter hospital stays than ALT patients (p<0.05). Two patients in group ALT developed temporary neurological complications postoperatively, which was significantly higher than that in groups TECAB (n=0) and PLS (n=0) (p<0.05). Mean follow-up was 12.2±2.1 (range 7.2 to 16.1) years with completed in 81.7 % of the patients. There were 17 late deaths. Freedom from graft problems was 87.5%, 86.5% and 94.7%; freedom from percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) was 78.1%, 82.7% and 68.4% and freedom from Re-CABG was 100%, 96.1% and 94.7% in PLS, TECAB and ALT group, respectively. Pain intensity was similar between all three groups.
Conclusion: MICS CABG can be performed safely and effectively. Short and long-term outcomes of MICS CABG are comparable with those of the conventional CABG. There were no major differences regarding pain intensity between all three groups, although all three minimally invasive techniques have completely different surgical accesses.